Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

 Ask Your VA Claims Question  

 Read Current Posts 

  Read Disability Claims Articles 
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users |  Search  | Rules 

chrome_305

Third Class Petty Officers
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About chrome_305

Recent Profile Visitors

541 profile views

chrome_305's Achievements

  1. Does the VDPA still stand as offical? Can VA benifits & SSI be used when deciding a child support amount here in FL? If it those are the source only income. I have look and still find different answers.
  2. Hi, All I just awarded 70% in MAY 13 that was backdated to July 1, 2011, but I was on Pension since Nov 2011. I called peggy today becuase i couldn't understand the amount deposited in my bank and they said that since I was on pension that the retro is being offset by my pension payments. Can this happen? eg: 70 % for single is 1336 and pension for single is 1038 the difference for it would be 298.
  3. Thanks for great information Berta, I will definite be using it. As far as the NOD I think the time on it doesn' t start since I wasn't mailed a TDIU form. I believe I read it some where but can't find it again .
  4. I had a over all rating of 0%. When I was awared Pension in 2011. Just was successful an appeal to 70% PTSD dated May 2013 back pay to june 2011. My NOD is counting down and what i have below I want to submit as CUE but need help. Now, Should I not be considered P&T since I have both comp & pension plus I have updated PTSD DBQ and records all in VA hands. I dont plan to use all but need anyine everyone help. TIA ==================== I respectfully request the VA to call a clear and unmistakable error "CUE" under evidentiary requirements of 38 CFR 4.6., 38 C.F.R. 3.160,38 USC § 5109A, 38 C.F.R. 3.155, 38 C.F.R. 3.156,38 C.F.R. § 4.16(a) , 38 CFR § 3.3(a) (2) (iv)) and to correct it. 1. Lack of TDIU consideration occurred in decision rating dated May 24, 2013 VARO St. Petersburg Regional Office. Rating Decision dated May 24, 2013 "We determined that you are entitled entitlement to both VA pension and service connected disability. Overall rating or combined rating of 70%. We do not add the individual percentages of each condition to determine your combined rating. We use a combined rating table that considers the effect from the most serious to the least serious condition" " We enclosed VA form 21-8764, " Disability Compensation Award Attachment-Important Information" which explain certain factors concerning your claim., Decision letter fails to acknowledge, refer or address TDIU." Summary: Veteran is entitled to a 100% disability rating if he can established that his service- connected disability [ies] preclude him from obtaining gainful employment. “TDIU”, referring to a Total Disability rating based upon Individual Unemployability. See 38 CFR § 3.3(a) (2) (iv)) 2. Decision letter May 24, 2013, C&P exam dated March 28, 2013 (PTSD Initial DBQ), VA Pension award granted Nov 1, 2011, and VA Pension Eligibility Verification Report 2011-2013 contain sufficient and current detail to warrant an adjudication for which is "reasonably raised" by the records documents or medical records held by VAMCs to include VARO St. Petersburg Regional Office, while not explicitly in the C-file, were still in the VA’s “constructive possession”. Summary: An informal request for TDIU or IU should apply to rating decisions May 24, 2013 awarded July 1, 2011. Potential entitlement to TDIU is part of every claim for disability compensation. See Rice v. Shinseki, 22 Vet. App. 447, 454-55 (2009) 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(a) 3. See 38 C.F.R. 4.16 (Ratings for compensation based on unemployability) “Total disability ratings for compensation may be assigned, where the scheduler rating is less than total, when the disabled person is, in the judgment of the rating agency, unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation as a result of service-connected disabilities..." Summary: The current over-all rating for service connection compensation of the veteran is 70% dated May 24, 2013. Equally, when a claimant or the evidence of record reasonably raises an informal claim for TDIU, the Secretary must furnish the claimant the form (VAF 21-8940) as prescribed by the Secretary. See 38 C.F.R. 3.160 4. See Rating decision dated May 24, 2013: Enclosures: Evidence and Evaluation Criteria page seven. Summary: Rating Decision dated May 24, 2013 granting 70% does not contain form VAF 21- 8940. 5. See: 38 C.F.R 3.155(a) See also: Enclosures: Evidence and Evaluation Criteria contained in rating decision dated May 24, 2013 page seven. Summary: “Upon receipt of an informal claim, if a formal claim has not been filed, an application form will be forwarded to the claimant for execution." 6. See: 38 C.F.R. 3.156 Summary: The veteran is entitled to an effective date for the award of TDIU as of the date of his original claim, that being July 1, 20011. See also: Rice v. Shinseki, 22 Vet. App. 447, 453-54 (2009); see also Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 88, 96 (1996) See: AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38 (1983); see also Roberson v. Principi, 251 F.3d 1378, 1383 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Norris v. West, 12 Vet. App. 413, 421 (1999). Summary: A veteran is not required to file a TDIU application form before the VA is obligated to consider and adjudicate a TDIU claim. When a veteran files an original claim for evaluation of a disability or a claim for an increase in the evaluation of a disability that has already been rated by the VA, the claimant is generally presumed to be seeking the highest benefit allowable. Summary: If it is apparent that the service connected disabilities keep the veteran out of the work force, then VA must assign the rating of 100% disabled due to Individual Unemployability. I take exception to and preserve for appeal ALL errors the VARO may have made or the Board hereafter might could make in deciding this appeal. This includes all legal errors, all factual errors, failure to follow M21-1, all due process errors and any failures to discharge the duty to assist as violation of basic VA laws and regulations within 38 USCS and 38 CFR. Please prepare and award the proper rating and retro payment as an accrued benefit to me, under this clear and unmistakable error in the enclosed findings. =================
  5. hey guys here is a update I got the envelope in the mail..... Here is what the approval says it says ....."Your lay testimony was adequate to establish the occurance of the claimed stressor and the claimed stressor is consistant with the places, types, and circumstances of your service. the VA exaiminer also related your stressor to the fear of hostile military or terrorist activity, and the exaiminer linked your PTSD symptoms to the stressor. An examination will be scheduled at a future date to evaluate the severity of your service connected PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder)." Then it goes on and denies some claims saying they dont have the c-file and their are some they denied saying this multiple times "The evidence does not show an event, disease or injury in service." When there is. It also says ... "we determined that you are entitled to both disibility pension and service connected compensation. Under Va law yo can't recieve both benifits at the same time. We have granted service connected compensation as the greater benefit. However, you may choose( or 'elect') to recieve either benifit program at anytime. Your overall or combined rating is 70%. We do not add the individual percentages of each condition to determine your combined rating. We use a combined rating table that considers the effects from the most serious to the least serious conditions. We enclosed Va form 21-8764, "Disibillity Compensation Award Attachment-Important Information" which explains certain factors concering your benifits." Here is the break down for giving me 70% We have assigned a 70 percent evaluation for your PTSD based on: Occupational ans social impairment , with deficiencies in most areas, such as work,school, family relations, judment, thinking, or mood difficulty in adapting to a worklike setting Difficulty in adpating to stressful circumstances Inability to establish and maintain effective relationship obsessional rituals which interfer with routine activites Speech intermittenly illogical Suicidal ideation The exaimer assessment of your current mental functioning, which is partially reflected in your Global Assessment of Function score found below Difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships Disturbance of motivation and mood Flatted affect Impaired judment Panic attacks more than once a week Anxiety Chronic sleep impairment Depressed mood Suspiciousness It goes on to say why I fit in the 70% category and not 100% for PTSD.
  6. Sorry I thought you had already been to the BVA and the disabilities you have listed as reopened were reopened (remanded) by the BVA.. I must say it's difficult to follow your claim. Best Wishes C.B. I have been denied those things labeled"reopen" and had let time expire but everything got reopen in 2011. Everything reopened was rated non service connected except rash on chest which was 0%
  7. What is remands? My latest DBQ for PTSD says issue with work and that I haven't had a gainful work since 2010. I have plenty of mental health records showing issue with work. I do have a Rep but not a good one.
  8. This is what I have. A C&P report which has neuropenia axis from May 2006. Report also has lab results in the C&P showing the blood levels and says the condition is due to military service. I was discharged Sept 2005. There is also VA lab reports (lots), metal health diagnosis reports, VA doc report that says "Neutropenia now with mild Thrombocytopenia" that I sent them during my appeal. ====================== I understand what your saying Berta. I filled for the "new" disibilities and secondary all at one time. VA added those items to the recent appeal. Shouldn't the VA have added those this long ago for me even if it was non service connected.
  9. I forgot all about the C&P report from 2006 until recently. I ask for all my C&P exams from VA clinic (which i have done plenty of times ). I went to my Va rep filled a claim send VA proof of the C&P from 2006 and also follow up lab results which they can produce themselves since I have been a blood bank to the VA since 2006. Then Va added the condition to my appeal as "new". i just recently did this while the appeal was gathering evidence phase. I never heard anything from the VA about a rating for the now "new" conditions after the C&P exam from 2006. My secondary diagnosis of Thromboyctopia is connected to Neutropenia. The VA can even Google it if they want. Shouldn't that at least be rated 10% by VA law? ================ Also the Va has the "new" condition on E-bennies misspelled
  10. thanks looks like i will file for IU if needed. Might be another 2 plus years for IU -_-.
  11. Thanks guys! :D I have a question. If I file for TDIU and get approved does that mean things like ch35 etc.
  12. ty See the thing is I sent the info in 4 times already once by mail,fax ,phone, VA rep. They even closed my dependency claim because it went to wrong department. -_- and reopened it after I called and did a Inquiry. Can I get SSDI and should I file for TDUI if im not 100%. Im a little confused since I was getting VA pension. I guess happy and nervous :D
  13. I looked again on e-bennies and went the "file new claim route". I seen that the 70% is for PTSD but all the conditions that were labeled "new , reopen & 2ndary" are shown as not-service connected. I have proof that they are service connected since I have a C&P exam from 2006 that has a diagnosis of " neutropenia and pes plantus" which I also sent the VA. Funny thing is the VA didn't give me an exam for the new conditions.
  14. My Current SC% Last Rating Decision was in 2010 Currently awarded Va Non-service pension since Nov 2011 Rating(s) 1. Dysthymic disorder ( Not Service-Connected) 2. Chest wall syndrome, claimed as chest pain, tightness and difficulty breathing (0%) 3. Hearing loss, left ear (Not Service-Connected) 4. Tinnitus, claimed as ringing in the ears ( Not Service-Connected) 5. Residuals of fracture of the left ring finger with pinning, to include post traumatic arthritis with ankylosis of the distal interphalangeal joint (dominant) (0%) 6. rash on chest ( Not Service-Connected) 7. sycosis barbae, claimed as razor bumps of the face (0%) 8. PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder) (Not Service-Connected) ====================================================================== *My claims Date Opened: 6/24/11 Type of claim: Appeal Est Completion Date:Done 1. PTSD (Reopen) 2. Tinnitus (Reopen) 3. Rash on Chest (Reopen) 4. Hearing Loss, Left Ear (Reopen) 5. Hearing Loss, Right Ear (New) 6. neutropenial leukopenia (New) 7. bilateral pes planus (New) 8. mitral valve (New) 9. thrombocytopenia 2nd to leukippenia (Secondary) ========================================================================== That you everyone this site is awesome and very helpful. I check ebbenies today and my AB8 showed me rated at 70%, but it also show the pay rate as single. I also check the benefits explorer and it showed 70% on both and P&T. I currently still have a dependency claim thats open but pending decision approval. The thing I was wondering is what to do next? I have been getting the VA pension since 2011 which would mean I am P&T so shouldn't I be rated at 100% and P&T and not 70%? I don't have SSI or SSDI. It's been a long battle with the VA. I don't know what was rated what yet. I will keep you guys updated.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use