Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

VA Disability Claims Articles

Ask Your VA Claims Question | Current Forum Posts Search | Rules | View All Forums
VA Disability Articles | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users

leadbelly1981

Second Class Petty Officers
  • Posts

    64
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About leadbelly1981

Previous Fields

  • Service Connected Disability
    30%
  • Hobby
    flying

leadbelly1981's Achievements

  1. The claim was filed Nov 17 2003 2 days before my eta. Thank you for your input.
  2. Navy4life I'm sure the icd diagnostic books for 2003 Also have a diagnostic code for constipation unspecified I just haven't found it online yet but your point is well taken thank you
  3. The c and p exam was in 2003 a few days before my enlistment was up or ets. The decision is dates Feb 2004. I reopened it on e benefits Sep 2015. I was just awarded 30 percent based on the DBQ from doctor Owens on Dec 7 2015. I want to get this claim back dated to the initial claim date which would be the when the va first received it in 2003 Or maybe their decision in 2004. I have little understanding of this process but in the denial in 2004 the rater said the physician stated I suffered from constipatiin, which is a symptom not a diagnosis. I believe this is a Colvin violation because the rater said constipation is a symptom not a diagnosis, which is not true. Also even with my smr history the rater should have applied 4.20 analogous ratings for my chronic constipation instead of denying. What is your opinion Berta? On sorry if I was unclear in earlier statements. I'm trying to present as clear of a picture as possible. Thank you.
  4. Berth thank you for your input. I ets in 2003. Above you can see the 2004 denial the 2015 c and p opinion and the 2016 decision.my computer is not letting me upload for some reason right now. Also the lawyer ants me to cue the 2004 decision.
  5. Navy4Life hey thanks for your advice. ok I talked to a Veterans law attorney today He said I should file a CUE. I typed this up in the last hour. I know I will need to make changes any and all input is greatly appreciated. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 2-1-2015 CLAIMS INTAKE CENTER PO BOX 5235 JANESVILLE, WI 53547-5235 Notice of Disagreement This notice of disagreement is being filed based on a CUE and a Colvin violation that resulted in the denial of service connection. The date of the rating decision is February 13, 2004. The condition that was denied in error is constipation (claimed as “bowel movement problems”). This condition later was service connected at 30% as irritable bowel syndrome with chronic constipation, with an effective date of September 22, 2015. The effective date of service connection should be February 13, 2004, listed on the following page is the legal reasoning. Thank you for reviewing this matter. Veteran The evidence in SMR clearly shows that while in the service I suffered from constipation. The evidence in SMR also shows a diagnosis of chronic constipation on 5/31/01. The evidence in SMR also notes on 8/26/03 Constant problems with constipation for the past two and a half years. During the Compensation and Pension exam, dated November 17, 2003 the physician concluded that I suffered from suffered from constipation. The wording in the rating decision dated February 13, 2004 states: We are unable to grant you service connection for constipation (claimed as “bowel movement problems”) because the evidence fails to show a medically diagnosable condition was incurred or aggravated by active duty. The SMRs show that a health care practitioner treated you for “probable constipation” in January 2001; no professional rendered a medical diagnosis. According to the evidence you did not obtain medical treatment for a chronic condition thereafter. During the C and P exam, the doctor noted normal bowel sounds. There was no tenderness to palpitation, heptosplenogaly or guarding. The physician concluded that you suffered from “constipation”, which is a symptom not a medical diagnosis. We can revisit this issue if you provide credible objective medical evidence showing a chronic medical condition that was incurred or aggravated during military service. Please reference the sentence found above in the reasoning for denial of service connection that is bold and underlined. This sentence explains that the physician concluded that I suffered from constipation, which is true. This sentence also states that “constipation” is a symptom not a medical diagnosis. That part of the statement is entirely not true and is a Colvin violation. At minimum constipation is found in 2016 ICD - 10 – CM diagnostic code K59.00 constipation unspecified. A Colvin violation is Cleary present in the reasoning of denial of service connection. The VA may not use the medical opinion or judgment of the VA rater or BVA Veterans Law Judge to support a decision. Please reference number two above I was diagnosed chronic constipation ICD code: 564.00 on 5/31/01. This is also stated in my SMR. Under 38 CFR 4.20 it states: 38 CFR § 4.20 Analogous ratings. When an unlisted condition is encountered it will be permissible to rate under a closely related disease or injury in which not only the functions affected, but the anatomical localization and symptomatology are closely analogous. Conjectural analogies will be avoided, as will the use of analogous ratings for conditions of doubtful diagnosis, or for those not fully supported by clinical and laboratory findings. Nor will ratings assigned to organic diseases and injuries be assigned by analogy to conditions of functional origin. Under the law, 38 CFR 4.20 Analogous ratings my claim for constipation (claimed as “bowel movement problems”) I should have been granted service connection February 13, 2004 based on the evidence which was available at the time, and is listed above for your review. Dr. Owens a VA Medical doctor specializing in Gastroenterology medically opined at a C and P dated December 7, 2015 “In my medical opinion his prior denial of service connected status on 2/13/04 was in error in not recognizing that his medical condition, present since 5/31/01, is irritable bowel syndrome, constipation predominant”. this is as far as I have got.
  6. I received my decision an award of 30 percent. I am posting a picture that includes the exact wording of the 2004 denial the 2015 c and p opinion and the 2016 decision. In the evidence for the current decision they did not list anything for the 2003 c and p exam. Getting m ibs backdated to 2003 when I first submitted the claim would bring about 60k in retro as I had a 50 rating from 2004 to 2013 and now after current award went from 60 to 70 . Any and all help is greatly appreciated. I'm considering hiring an attorney to fight for an earlier eed.
  7. One question I have is , is this not enough to get the VA to reverse their decision or at least sc me for the New diagnosis? In my opinion as a gastroenterologists, mr. B 's condition of abdominal bloating and chronic constipation represents irritable bowel syndrome, constipation predominate. It is more likely than not this this is the same condition for which he was seen in the army on these dates. His complaint was never properly evaluated by the army prior to his discharge on. this condition has been continuously present by history and has been documented to present in va records at least since presentation to the sr va in 2009. In my opinion his prior denial of va service connected status was in error in not recoginizing that his medical condition present since 2001 , is irritable bowel syndrome, constipation predominant. The next issue I'm wondering about now that I'm seeing how complex this whole process is. When I filed it was in 2003. Prior to my ets. I received the denial in early 2004. Ok that is straight forward. 9/ 22/ 2015. I click re open on e benefits because I still have the same issue but worse so I tried again. In all my reading the va doesn't re open claims that are outside the appeal process by more than a year without new and material evidence. Now I'm worried wondering what is going on. I never submitted new evidence. I got a call and went to the c and p exam that's it. This is literally all I have done. 1. Click reopen and submit on e benefits. 2. Go to mymy c and p as scheduled. 3. Request DBQ from SF VA release of iinformation Office. Is there something I'm missing. When I clicked reopen I e benefits did someone look at my c file the old decision and schedule the c and p for a particular reason. Did they realize a overlooked and? I feel lost on this. Berta thank you for your knowledge does the va send vets to c and p on a re open with the vet not submitting new material evidence?
  8. One question I have is , is this not enough to get the VA to reverse their decision or at least sc me for the New diagnosis? In my opinion as a gastroenterologists, mr. B 's condition of abdominal bloating and chronic constipation represents irritable bowel syndrome, constipation predominate. It is more likely than not this this is the same condition for which he was seen in the army on these dates. His complaint was never properly evaluated by the army prior to his discharge on. this condition has been continuously present by history and has been documented to present in va records at least since presentation to the sr va in 2009. In my opinion his prior denial of va service connected status was in error in not recoginizing that his medical condition present since 2001 , is irritable bowel syndrome, constipation predominant.
  9. Yes he directly said in the comments section of the DBQ. In my opinion as a gastroenterologists, mr. B 's condition of abdominal bloating and chronic constipation represents irritable bowel syndrome, constipation predominate. It is more likely than not this this is the same condition for which he was seen in the army on these dates. His complaint was never properly evaluated by the army prior to his discharge on. this condition has been continuously present by history and has been documented to present in va records at least since presentation to the sr va in 2009. In my opinion his prior denial of va service connected status was in error in not recoginizing that his medical condition present since 2001 , is irritable bowel syndrome, constipation predominant. I don't know how he could have helped my case anymore ? He definitely advocated for me.
  10. Hi everyone Claim moved to pending decision approval today. Thank you so much for the input. My two duty stations were Fort hood and camp casey South korea. My ETS was Nov 2003. Unfortunately I dont have anything else to share right now . I do feel that the DBQ that the c and p doctor filled out lines up with 30 percent. I did not give va any health records. All they have is my smr and va clinic records. Thank you for your advice and support. Is there anything else I should do right now the estimated completion was March 16 Last night now today it is Jan 29.
  11. The claim is preparation for decision now for the last week nothing else to report at this time.
  12. Is the whole site really shut down in error. Anyone else getting this. I cant access any information on here. Everything I try to opens reports as an error for the last 24 hours.
  13. Under evidence for the 2004 rating decision it list C and P exam dated November 17, 2003 I request my records and when they arrived there is not a c and p exam record included but In reading the decision closer I do notice that it states, Rating Decision 2004 Service connection for constipation claimed as bowel movement problems. We are unable to grant service connection for constipation claimed as bowel movement problems because the evidence fails to show a medically diagnosable condition was incurred or aggravated by active duty. The service medical records show a health care practitioner treated you for probable constipation in January 2001, however no professional rendered a medical diagnosis. according to the evidence you did not obtain treatment for a chronic condition thereafter. During the c and p exam the doctor noted normal bowel sounds there was no tenderness to palpitation, heptosplenogalyy or guarding. The physician concluded you suffered from "constipation", which is a symptom and not a medical diagnosis. We can revisit this issue if you provide crediable objective medical evidence showing a chronic medical condition was incurred or aggravated during military service. The physician concluded that you suffered from " Constipation" , which is a symptom and not a medical diagnosis. The way that this is written really sounds like the Physician stated in his notes that I suffered from "constipation" . Pretty straight forward, and that the rater stated "which is a symptom and not a medical diagnosis". Why would a C and P Doctor state that I suffered from constipation which is a symptom not a diagnosis? Wouldn't that be an incomplete exam rendering no real finding? Basically like saying hey he suffers from constipation which is a symptom of something but ill let you guess what it is? It just doesn't seem like something a doctor would put in his report. I could see a Doctor stating, the veteran suffers from constipation further tests are required, or just simply stating that I suffer from constipation. I cant really see a doctor stating the veteran suffers from constipation which is a symptom not a diagnosis. At least not on a c and p exam which its purpose is to render a medical opinion. Anyone agree that this is does not fall in line with a medical opinion? The physician concluded that you suffered from " Constipation" , which is a symptom and not a medical diagnosis. Vync I really think you nailed it with If the doctor said this, then they obviously don't understand § 4.20 (see below). If the rater said this, then they obviously don't understand § 4.20 (see below) and it could also be what is called a Colvin violation (unqualified person incorrectly tries to interpret a medical data on their own).
  14. Exactly we were discouraged from going to sick call. Only shit bags go there right? I'll look into my records for the word chronic or constant. Thanks for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use