ghoffmanpdx

Berta, No offense taken at all! I'm considerably more thick skinned than that. I probably worded it poorly. My hope is that my documentation saying that I was there to begin with, in addition to Directorate I worked for would be proof enough that it would at least be seriously considered. I am going to review the RODS closer with their maps to see what places/areas would be more supportive of my case. Thank you so much for helping me think a little more clearly before I just pull the trigger and barf unnecessary/irrelevant documents on the VA.

Thanks Berta! I was a 76Y (Supply Specialist) and the Directorates I worked in were 1) The Personnel Housing Office, which we had to go to all quarters and barracks to replace/deliver furniture, appliances, etc. and 2) The Directorate that was overall responsible for ALL property on the base, which took me to most of the listed areas multiple times. I'm hoping that one of my awards, which names the last Directorate where I worked, along with orders and Active Duty Assignment History with the corresponding UIC will be enough.

Hi all, I was stationed at a little post called Vint Hill Farm Station 88-92. I have JUST found this report https://sites.google.com/site/renspur/vint-hill-toxins My question is: should I submit this evidence in support of my diabetes mellitus claim? I'm going to research more about other possible connections, but this really just caught me off guard. Thank you.

jbasser, Just how would I go about challenging that? Thank you

Greetings all, I was awarded SC @ 70% for various issues. My examiner entered that I was employed full time at the time of my exam, which I was not. She also put in there that my conditions do prevent me from pursuing substantially gainful employment. Do these contradict each other? I have applied for TDIU back on Dec. 1st and, of course, don't expect immediate results. Will the seeming contradiction affect the TDIU decisíns? Thank you.