vlb-all-products

vlb-c-file-manual


  • Topics

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,996
    • Most Online
      3,604

    Newest Member
    Jim Lites
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      61,334
    • Total Posts
      395,616
  • Posts

    • It would help too if we can read here the actual C & P exam results.
    • It does not pay to compare your claims and percentages to any other veteran's situation. It sounds to me like you are missing the inservice nexus factor for the foot condition and also the anxiety and depression. Can you scan and attach their Reasons and Bases here and the evidence list (cover your C file #, name, address prior to scanning it) The decision should state what is lacking and the VCAA letter (5103 waiver) told you what evidence they needed.
    • It could be?   it will say what it is IF its QTC or not,  The VA uses for contracting out  the C&P Exams  OR it could be some other contractor?  QTC is Located  there in Calif. (Home Office) The VA uses QTC Contractors here in Tx too from Calif.....it also could be  the VA  doing the C&P? ...The packet/letters should have instructions? 
    • I get 73 also.  Either they made a mistake or you are missing a disability.
    • I was just curious if Request for Increase claims move faster than new claims. I understand that different ROs and certain claims take longer but I was talking to another vet and we didn't quite know the answer. I assumed they would move faster because the VA typically already has the evidence from the past and are now looking at more or newer evidence.





oldvet

Metatarsal Arthritis

12 posts in this topic

How is VA supposed to rate this? As arthritic joints or a foot injury? I have been cited as having a "foot injury" under 5284. and therefore rated as a 0 because it does not meet the moderate condition. If the Xray shows arthritis of the metatarsal joints shouldn't that be rated as such?

Thanks,

oldvet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



I can think of three different dx codes that they could legitimately rate this condition under. The codes are 5003 (Arthritis, degenerative), 5017 (Gout), and 5020 (Synovitis). 5003 and 5020 use the same rating criteria. 5017 uses a different rating criteria that would be more advantageous to you, but doubtful that you could get the VA to rate it under this code as "analagous," since you have a actual diagnosis that matches a ratable diagnostic code. The rating criteria is:

5003 Arthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis):

Degenerative arthritis established by X-ray findings will be rated on the basis of limitation of motion under the appropriate diagnostic codes for the specific joint or joints involved (DC 5200 etc.). When however, the limitation of motion of the specific joint or joints involved is noncompensable under the appropriate diagnostic codes, a rating of 10 pct is for application for each such major joint or group of minor joints affected by limitation of motion, to be combined, not added under diagnostic code 5003. Limitation of motion must be objectively confirmed by findings such as swelling, muscle spasm, or satisfactory evidence of painful motion. In the absence of limitation of motion, rate as below:

With X-ray evidence of involvement of 2 or more major joints

or 2 or more minor joint groups, with occasional incapacitating

exacerbations 20

With X-ray evidence of involvement of 2 or more major joints

or 2 or more minor joint groups 10

Note (1): The 20 pct and 10 pct ratings based on X-ray findings, above, will not be combined with ratings based on limitation of motion.

Note(2): The 20 pct and 10 pct ratings based on X-ray findings, above, will not be utilized in rating conditions listed under diagnostic code 5013 to 5024, inclusive.

For the other two codes:

The diseases under diagnostic codes 5013 through 5024 Will be rated on limita­tion of motion of affected parts, as arthritis, degenerative, except gout which will be rated under diagnostic code 5002.

5002 Rating criteria:

5002 Arthritis rheumatoid (atrophic) as an active process

With constitutional manifestations associated with

active joint involvement, totally incapacitating 100

Less than criteria for 100% but with weight loss and anemia

productive of severe impairment of health or severely

incapacitating exacerbations occurring 4 or more times a year

or a lesser number over prolonged periods 60

Symptom combinations productive of definite impairment of

health objectively supported by examination findings or

incapacitating exacerbations occurring 3 or more times a year 40

One or two exacerbations a year in a well-established diagnosis 20

For chronic residuals:

For residuals such as limitation of motion or ankylosis, favorable or unfavor­able, rate under the appropriate diagnostic codes for the specific joints involved. Where, however, the limitation of motion of the specific joint or joints involved is noncompensable under the codes a rating of 10 percent is for application for each such major joint or group of minor joints affected by limitation of motion, to be combined, not added under diagnostic code 5002. Limitation of motion must be objectively confirmed by findings such as swelling, muscle spasm, or satisfactory evidence of painful motion.

Note: The ratings for the active process will not be combined with the residual ratings for limitation of motion or ankylosis. Assign the higher evaluation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would VA give me a zero percentage and say that I was rated under 5284 Foot injuries, other?

The examiner showed traumatic arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. The code on the worksheet shows 5299-5284. Am I missing something ?

Thanks,

oldvet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah...they played with the codes. You need to file a NOD and tell them to change the code to 5002 with at least a 10% rating. Tell them that this is a erroneous code, as the diagnosis has it's own code in 38 CFR 4.71a, and does not need to use a analogous code. Also tell them that 38 CFR 4.13 allows for chaging of erroneous codes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rentalguy1,

I believe that I need to go a similar route with my case except I'll use diagostic code 5003 due to traumatic injury. Is there a way that I can request and get a copy of my examiner's report? X-rays were taken of my hand and I'm interested in seeing whether or not any arthritis was noted. I have a suspicion that since I didn't specifically request compensation due to arthritis, even though I complained of pain, they may have ignored it and simply based their rating on what I put on the claim form...left hand fracture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah...they played with the codes. You need to file a NOD and tell them to change the code to 5002 with at least a 10% rating. Tell them that this is a erroneous code, as the diagnosis has it's own code in 38 CFR 4.71a, and does not need to use a analogous code. Also tell them that 38 CFR 4.13 allows for chaging of erroneous codes.

Thanks rentaguy1 ! Appreciate the help!

oldvet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now