• Who's Chatting

    There are no users currently in the chat room


Help - This Vet Has No Cib - Cab Award

21 posts in this topic

This vet has no CIB - CAB award.

Does this info from his 201 prove (as PTSD stressor) for combat vet?

13F10 - Asst Mach Gunner 14 Aug 1968


16F10 - Asst Mach Gunner 14 Feb 1969

along with


VN Counteroffensive Phase V

VN Counteroffensive Phase VI

Tet/69 Counteroffensive

Unnamed Campaign

I have scanned these forms and will try to upload them here.

Thanks for any and all responses.




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carlie I believe that his MOS (Combat Arms) and campains in Vietnam would prove to be PSTD Stressors. Only Special Forces and Infantry recieve the Combat Infantrymens Badge.

As for the Combat Action Badge which was authorized on 5 May 2005. He is not authorized for award as follows:

"(6) Retroactive awards for the CAB are not authorized prior to 18 September 2001, applications (to include supporting documentation) for retroactive awards of the CAB will be forwarded through the first two star general in the chain of command to CG, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN: AHRC-PDO-PA, Alexandria, VA 22332-0471."

HIs time of service in Vietnam is prior to the actual creation of the CAB.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not had time to read the scans- but traditionally VA wants proof of stressor, unless PH, CIB or CAR is on the veterans DD 214-

My husband was USMC Vietnam- all USMC were considered infantry regardless of their MOS-

he had numerous decorations/awards but

he still had to prove his stressors.

Although Rod was in combat many times- his actual stressors had nothing to do with the direct combat-just the results in a few cases and many had nothing whatsoever to do with the firefights at all.

there were many reasons Vietnam vets had significant stressors.

Some considered combat as just part of the job.

Edited by Berta

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think combat MOS and Vietnam campaigns are enough to prove combat with the enemy. I could be wrong since I had combat MOS and Vietnam campaigns but no CIB since I was in an aviation brigade. I had Pathfinder MOS but ended up in Aviation.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't understand why the VA puts specific stressors on there criteria. Being shot at is being shot! Its at a disturbing situation that one finds one self in. As well as seeing the aftermath or being involved in a scud attack. The memories and experiences carry on for years but not the physical results. All a 201 has in it are your awards campaigns and duty assignments not the actual happenings of day to day things in a combat area. Its a broke system for sure.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with John-so would the VA- I know it doesnt seem to make sense but the VA wants proof of stressors.

A stressful event will be either documented in the unit morning reports or the vet can get a buddy statement.

I had a vet many years ago who wanted help with his claim- he related about 15 stressors to me and about 20 to his shrink-

they were all different-

JSRRC couldnt find proof of any of them.

He was in combat zone -Vietnam.

But he had no valid stressors.

Please check out my topic here under Stressors defined.

If it happened it can be proven.Most of the time.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now





  • Topics

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
    • Most Online

    Newest Member
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Posts

    • John, the younger doctors don't even understand the true implications of AO exposure, much less the  public. The younger generation connects the words agent orange with the pop music band.
    • I agree with Gastone but would rather see you go the TDIU route with an "S" award. Difficult to do if you are still working though. If you go the 100% scheduler route, you can still work. It does appear to me, that on the surface, the C&P examiner did you a good job. The exam should put you over the top. Generally, I would guess maybe a 30% award, but that comment the examiner made about how it affects your working ability adds considerably to the DBQ. It is not a wise move for anyone to try and guess what a rater might do, but you asked. I almost passed on my 2 cents but I could not resist. Nothing to loose considering that you are already at 93%. Who knows, with the bilateral factor added you just might reach 100 + 60 territory anyway. good luck and thanks for your service!
    • Berta, all I can say is "True Grit"! Been there and done that!
    • Berta got a bee in her bonnet, give em hell Berta.
    • Don't over complicate matters. If your doctor did indeed diagnose you with DM II, and stated that diagnosis in your medical records, for service connection purposes, you are diabetic. Makes no difference how he/she came to that conclusion or what test was or was not preformed. As far as getting it service connected, that is a different matter and will involve more medical opinions in the form of multiple Nexus letters and an event in service that can be as likely as not identified as the cause of your diabetes.