• Who's Chatting

    There are no users currently in the chat room


Award Letter

17 posts in this topic

hours ago I irised VARO Buffalo to remind them I won 6 claims issues under Nehmer-I wanted to do this hopefully before the award letter came .

I just got the award letter in the mail-

They awarded me SC death but forgot to mention the money!!!!!

And they skillfully completely ignored that this is now a death directly due to AO.

I am calling up NVLSP- I am livid -

They also said they enclosed a pamphlet as to additional benefits I am entitled to but the pamphlet wasnt in the envelope.

And then they sent a separate statement that my CUEs are still on appeal-

but my award should render them moot and they still have to decide SMC.

They cannot do a single thing right- the BVA decision clearly states I an entitled to offset FTCA refund as well as other ancillary benefits- what a bunch of DOPES!

I will re send my Iris as a complaint and then maybe I will get respond from someone there who is literate

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for double post- I irised them and it felt good to send as complaint-

I referred them to my Iris of a few hours ago-I did their work for them-

I told the VSCM ( Looks like a shuffle has occurred there on the past VSCM-she is not VSCM anymore) that if he reads my prior Iris he can write a proper award letter-

as I wrote it for him- the dope

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they be that dumb on purpose?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

John they regularly do stuff like that to me so the answer is YES they can and do things like this DUMB all the time even after it seems like they know they have been caught and it's time to quit playing, yet the games continue so it has to be on purpose who is going to hold them accountable?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

They owe me almost a 6 figure award- it will be over 6 figures when I figure out the accrued SMC .

They do this deliberately-

I called the VSCM at his desk phone and left message for him and I filed Iris complaint-

I think when they stall for so long ( this all took over 6 years but they had all the evidence in 2003 and 2004-the same evidence the BVA awarded on -on April 29th)

they know the retro is a biggie-

I could not send them a letter last week-PC problems- but I have the evidence attached to the letter as prove of what they owe me-

and I listed it all in my iris complaint- of course they have all this in the c file anyhow-

They will have to CUE themselves on both decisions I just got.

But what great evidence I have now for the next Sub COmmiittee hearing in June (oversight/investigations) to prove how incompetent they truly are. :unsure:

Unless they fix this fast.The BVA award covers all of my 6 pending issues.

I got Rod Peace with Honor-so I dont mind playing their little war game for the money-

But it gets me that many widows out there would not have a good rep or be able to handle a award letter like this themselves.That is a Travesty.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Berta, I don't know if you remember a few weeks ago when Buffalo sent me a decision letter telling me that my knee had always been rated at 20% and would continue to be rated at the level, even though it was going from 10% to 20% that I had requested a DRO hearing on. I had sent an IRIS about it and never got a reply. A week or so later I got a decision letter telling me that my knee had been approved for 20% (along with my IVDS/DDD). Long story short, I already got my retro a week and a half ago and whadda ya know, 2 days after that I get a reply to the IRIS about the first decision letter saying "that was a typo, please ignore that letter, your knee is rated at 10% pending the DRO hearing results".

Stay on them! I think that we have Buffalo scared. I was going to drop my possible CUE for a EED for my knee, but ya know what, $12000 or so in retro sounds good to me so I think I'm gonna file it after all. they seem pretty willing to apply the law fairly right now.

Sorry for the set-back, but you will win!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now





  • Topics

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
    • Most Online

    Newest Member
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Posts

    • It is a fact that insulin injections cause weight gain problems. Another fact is that, yes, some VA doctors will be very adamant as to the cause of the OSA. If you expect a VA doctor to write you a letter then you need to know how to ask for it. Don't be meek, but rather confident and assertive. Ask for what you want.  
    • If your C&P was actually preformed by the local VAMC you can get the result after three business days from ebenefits or from ROI at the VAMC. If your C&P was farmed out to be preformed by QTC your results will not be available to you until after the claim is decided.
    • The very first prerequisite for R-1 is to obtain a "O" rating. Read CFR 3.350 - 3.352 for eligibility rules. You don't mention anything about SMC "S" that you should qualify for, and you might qualify for regular A&A, depending upon your individual circumstances.
    • Just my opinion but it looks to me like you could qualify for mild lower raticular group ratings of both arms (as they note several nerve groups affected) which would give you 20% per arm and add 10% on top of that for bilateral conditions.  You may hit 100%.  That being said, it would surprise me if they don't schedule you for an EMG.  This test is a breeze if you have sensory issues.
    • Filing an Actual Appeal, Claiming a CUE is way different than Requesting an "Official Review for Possible CUE," of a recently decided Claim/Denial. I was successful with mine, granted that doesn't mean you would be with yours. My lay opinion is, the Rater failed to properly take your IMO into consideration. The PA's opinion can not be held as equal to that of an MD Board Certified Surgeon. At the very least, you raising the issue, may get it another look, by a Sr Rater or actual DRO. Definitely worth a shot, sooner rather than later. You would still have your NOD waiting in the wings. Nobody at the VA Rating Dept wants to be reversed on Appeal, looks bad and brings into question their competence. I had a late 2014 C & P SA Increase with a Recent Pul Hypertension SX as Secondary to the SA. The C&P DR, VMC GP MD asked me why I was wasting his time, I'd been SA 50% since 10 and there wasn't grounds for an increase. I explained why I thought he was wrong, discussed 38 CFR 4 SA Ratings, he was adamant that I would not get an increase based on my SA & PH @ 0% SC. We agreed that we Disagreed. His negative SA Increase DBQ was in my MHV File the following week. Received a continuation of my SA @ 50% 05/15, the Rater agreed with the C & P Dr. Gave no consideration to my "Sworn Affidavit" where I laid out the Medical Evidence and Discussed in great detail how I met the SA 100% Rating Requirements. Just as I was getting ready to file my NOD requesting a DRO Hearing 01/03/2016, while printing a Copy of my VA IU Rating for the MI DAV Property Tax Exemption, I noticed an obvious ERROR on my DAV Confirmation page. Somehow, instead of 90% IU T & P, I was now Rated 100% SC Scheduler for SA, and Awarded SMC S (1) Scheduler Housebound. This was the result of a VA Phantom Sr Rater doing a "Quality Review" of my 05/15 Denial. So there was no need for my NOD, but the Sr Rater got the Retro Date of 05/15 Wrong, filed the "EED CUE Review Request" 05/15, additional Retro Awarded 07/16. Semper Fi