vlb-all-products

vlb-c-file-manual


  • Topics

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      16,107
    • Most Online
      3,604

    Newest Member
    Axhar
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      61,548
    • Total Posts
      397,220
  • Posts

    • Hey,  I had Dietz he is a hatchet man. This guy said the same things on my c and p as yours. Over reporting the mmpi or whatever it is. He also said the same thing about the glitch in the system. That in my heart is not true. He just wants to say no. What he did to you he did to me. I was denied and am fighting it now. This guy needs exposed. He runs a business on the side called medpsych of the Rockies. They are a professional company that challenges workers comp and Ssdi claims. This guy has a major uncomfortable vibe about him. With his low lit office and facial manirisims. He had a private practice that failed. It brought in less than 100 grand in a very large city. Columbus.  In Chillicothe I ran into a veteran that had the very same experience. I also ran into two vso and a social worker. The guy Denys or underreports. He is doing a disservice to veterans. You do not have a personality disorder neither do I. My psychs and PTSD programs have me at chronic. Sleep sucks intrusive thoughts suck driving sucks. He is a piece of work. I researched this dude. He is no good, he needs dealt with because he has a generic way of turning vets down. Over reporting, personality disorder, and calling the dbq glitche in the system, I bet he never asked you a question in regard to the dbq. There is no glitche. He simply answered no in regard to PTSD symptoms. Then he rushes you out the office hands you a packet and walks off with a dirty look. Do not give up. Continue your treatment, if denied file a recon based on new evidence. You served and he called you a liar. Basically his c and p should not be used, he is stating he is incompetent by stating any decision would be speculative. This will catch up to him.  Glitche in the system my a**. LIAR VA HATCHET. 
    • Killemall, The Regional office used the examination for re-evaluation as the C&P.  I discovered this as it was annotated in my medical notes that I was able to view via Blue Button in MyHealEVet. The rating ended up being:
      50% Bi-Lateral Hearing Loss / Word Recognition
      10% Tinnitus
      =VA math 55%, rounded up to 60%.
      This is a fair and accurate representation of my SC hearing loss and how it effects my life and work. However, the PTSD-MST claim was denied without the use of a C&P, as I did not officially report the crime while in the Army back in 1984.  The rater simply made an incorrect decision, which was absolutely devastating to me.  I don't expect the rater to fully understand how this could happen to a man and not be officially reported. No one deserves to understand that first hand.  It took me a few months to write up a short statement of disagreement as instructed by my VSO.   Interestingly, the VA (Medical / Physiological) division of the US Government, consisting of Clinical Psychiatrists and other experts in the field, believe I need intensive and specific treatment for my PTSD-MST.  So on November 6th, I will be heading to another VA inpatient PTSD facility located in Virginia for seven weeks.   This particular program is a tertiary referral center which has a division that specializes specifically on male MST cases like mine, which the Regional Office rater said does not exist due to lack of documentation. This matter will now last for many more painful years and I vow to never give up, just like when this unthinkable crime against me was committed.  I apologize for going off topic. BTW, this is the place I am headed to in November:  http://www1.va.gov/directory/guide/facility.asp?ID=116    
    • I recently learned how donating blood was good for (many people, not everyone)  Men, especially, tend to have too much iron.  (Women lose Iron from menstration, so its rarely a problem for women to have too much iron)  If you have too much iron, its bad for your health, it can even be life threatening.   http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/hemochromatosis/home/ovc-20167289 I was a bit suprised they would "take" my blood after I read about the health benefits of donating blood.   I answered all the questions honestly, and they took my blood.  They did a iron test, first, to see if my iron was low. (finger poke).    I donated blood locally, NOT through VA.   Remember, VA has to get you to sign a consent form to get medical information about you other than the VAMC's.      Here are a few health benefits of donating blood:  It reduces cancer risk, is heart healthy, and can be good for other organs also, especially for men with hi iron.   I read where "old blood" is "sticky" and tends to clot.  When you give blood, your body makes more "new" blood, which is slicker and is less likely to form blood clots.   Of course, you dont want to donate blood too often.  My area only allows you to donate whole blood every 56 days.  (2 months).    http://www.medicaldaily.com/why-donating-blood-good-your-health-246379
    • http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/copy-machine/n10022 "making copies", the Richmeister the copy machine guy, FWIW, Hamslice    
    • We dont know your PCP, so we dont know if she will help.  But, you need to seek treatment for ED for 2 reasons. First, for your wife, and secondly for the money.  (SMC K).  If you could do the Wild Monkey before the PTSD meds, and the Wild Monkey Dance is gone now, then that is a pretty obvious link.   If you want compensation for SMC K, you need it documented.  So you should start with your PCP.  If your PCP does not have experience/does not treat ED, then you should ask for a referral to someone who does.  





NSA-Saigon-ET

Nehmer Class Retro Pay For Ao/ihd Effective Date

28 posts in this topic

Hi all,

Was rereading the Nehmer Class action concerning my AO/IHD original claim.

I am a little confused how the law reads for retro payment dates.

Here is the short background summary.

Service including in-country Vietnam from 1967-1974

First felt Angina pain in 1994 and became a patient of a heart specialist in Cambridge, Ma.

After exhaustive testing was placed on medication and have been every since. (IHD diagnosis of some type, CAD,etc..)

Veteran lost private medical coverage and requested care under VA since 1997, first as a 0% SC and later on at 20% SC.

Archived VAMC records should have the IHD condition listed. I have not requested the older archived records, but did retrieve the newer records for another issue some time ago. They also list the IHD condition. These go back to 2001-2002.

Ok, so the VA has records that confirm this disability all the way back to 1997 and I can get the records from private doctor pretty easily

that take it back to 1994.

The veteran first filed for IHD disability in 2008, which was denied.

So the veteran comes under Nehmer.

The veteran then filed again in spring of 2010 for AO/IHD.

How far back will the Nehmer class take the compensation by law?

Please state the actual sentence for this.

Thanks!

donald

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



“As a result of the court order NVLSP obtained in its Agent Orange class action, Nehmer v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the VA is required to pay you, if your claim is successful, benefits retroactive to the date the VA first received your claim. “

http://www.nvlsp.org/Information/ArticleLibrary/AgentOrange/AO-VABeginsReview.htm

"The veteran first filed for IHD disability in 2008, which was denied.

So the veteran comes under Nehmer."

The date of the 2008 claim is the retro date.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Berta,

Thanks for your input.

I have copied this small section from the training guide and pasted it here:

Effective Date

The effective date of claims for service connection is the later of the date VA received the claim on which the prior denial was based or the date the disability arose.

For purposes of Nehmer IHD, PD, or HCL claims, the date a disability arose is the date VA had sufficient evidence or information to identify the existence of such a disease or, the evidence or information available was sufficient to "code" IHD, PD, or HCL as a disability pursuant to guidance regarding coding contained in the Veterans Benefits Adjudication Manual M21-1MR, and/or prior versions of such manual.

NOTE: 38 U.S.C. § 5110(g) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.114 do not apply to Nehmer claims.

This says that the original date I filed the claim is the date they could use for the retro award

or

it also says that they can use a date when the condition first became a disabling condition

whichever is later

My VA records show treatment for Arteriosclerosis before my original claim.

Does that change the effective retro date?

-donald

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Berta somewhat BUT if the VA has it in your records that they knew you had CAD/IHD they could, might maybe will consider another earlier date! keep your fingers and toes crossed and let us know.

This would be handled under Nehmer and would be called an inferred claim BUT again there is a lot of grey areas there!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Berta somewhat BUT if the VA has it in your records that they knew you had CAD/IHD they could, might maybe will consider another earlier date! keep your fingers and toes crossed and let us know.

This would be handled under Nehmer and would be called an inferred claim BUT again there is a lot of grey areas there!![

Simply mentioning or being diagnosed with a condition isn't enough; there must be a positive assertion that it is due to service before it is an inferred claim.

I noticed NSA-Saigon-ET is 20% SC. Now if when he filed a formal claim for SC for the condition that he got 20% for and while undergoing a C&P exam happens to mention to the doc that he thinks that his heart condition is also due to service, if the doc notes this assertion by NSA-Saigon-ET in his report, the decision maker at the RO is required to put the heart condition at issue just like he does the claimed condition. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply mentioning or being diagnosed with a condition isn't enough; there must be a positive assertion that it is due to service before it is an inferred claim.

I noticed NSA-Saigon-ET is 20% SC. Now if when he filed a formal claim for SC for the condition that he got 20% for and while undergoing a C&P exam happens to mention to the doc that he thinks that his heart condition is also due to service, if the doc notes this assertion by NSA-Saigon-ET in his report, the decision maker at the RO is required to put the heart condition at issue just like he does the claimed condition.

AHHHH! I see what you mean; that would be similar for a case of "duty to assist". The regulation says that the VA must help develop an issue it sees for a benefit to the vet even if the vet has not yet claimed the issue at that time. So, supposedly if the examiner finds a new issue while processing the existing issue, it is supposed to contact the claimant and help them on the new isue as well.

Not the same thing I am asking.

So getting back to the original question I posted :

The training guide says the retro effective date will be from the date of the original claim filed

OR

the date the disability arose.

It is that second part I do not understand.

It defines this as

"For purposes of Nehmer IHD, PD, or HCL claims, the date a disability arose is the date VA had sufficient evidence or information to identify the existence of such a disease "

In my case, the VAMC records show treatment for IHD from before I filed the original claim. These records go back to when I first transferred my health care from private practice to the VA system in 1997. This means to me that the records show the existence of the disease earlier than when I filed the claim.

So my question is this: Can my claim effective date be pushed back to 1997? The evidence I mentioned seems to comply with the training guide statements which says it should be.

-donald

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now