vlb-all-products

vlb-c-file-manual


  • Topics

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      16,014
    • Most Online
      3,604

    Newest Member
    SgtDan_USAF
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      61,353
    • Total Posts
      395,714
  • Posts

    • A CUE in a recent decision SHOULD be resolved ASAP! It is callous violation of our rights , for the VA to make ANY legal errors at all. And they get paid to make errors...no accountability at all..... I think many errors are deliberate,hoping we do not challenge them....and for some vets, they don't even know a legal error might have been made, an error that keeps $$$ in the VA coffers and not properly in their checking account.And they also might have a vet rep who does not have a Clue on CUE or does understand it but ignores the potential of a CUE 'claim' and never tells the veteran. This is quite a Victory and everything anyone needs to know about CUE is in our CUE forum.              
    • You should get housebound, per Howell.  You should read it.  https://asknod.org/2014/08/25/cavc-howell-v-nicholson-what-smc-s-really-says/
    • This has happened to me over the last year at the Boise VA Med Center.  I won't mention names, but here's what happened. Developed sores on my arms and legs, extremely itchy!!  Figured I'd use over the counter medicine to try to cure it. Saw my Psychiatrist (as I do every three months) for medicine.  He noticed the sores and said "you look like some of the people that use meth".  Gee, thanks Doc. A couple of months later, I saw my team NP.  She determined it was psoriasis and gave me some meds.  She told me to call back if no improvement.  This was around April 2016.  Called back and the nurse took a note.  I can see the note in E-Benefits (MyHeathyVet). Never heard from her. Told my anxiety and agoraphobia therapist about it.  No help. Decided "forget them" and went to a civilian dermatologist, who had a completely different diagnosis. Pretty much the only thing I can count on from the VA is a physical and that my meds will continue to be lowered.  I'm thinking that if Doc lowers my meds once more, I'll seek civilian treatment.  I don't need a Doc that belittles me and doesn't meet my needs. My suggestion to you would be to document it and try to elevate it.  Then seek treatment outside of the VA.
    • This is a must listen. Dr Cantrell is a very good advocate for all things PTSD .     http://www.blogtalkradio.com/haditcom/2016/08/26/bridget-c-cantrell-phd-is-an-award-winning-post-traumatic-stress-expert
    • I agree with J basser, If you were rated 90% IU  getting paid at the 100%  and also 70% for Depression =Meets the Criteria for SMC-S 1 Or if your were IU & Later got 70% Depression They should have gave you the statutory SMC-S- 1 H.B. Depression is a mental rating!  So it would be separate. jmo ........................Buck





rakkwarrior

Appeals Vs Reconsideration

22 posts in this topic

Often veterans become upset with a VA Rating Decision, see the appellate rights and opt for filing a Notice of Disagreement (NOD). This will typically invoke a long and arduous appeals process. Appeals within the VA system often last 2-6 years, not including BVA remands.

A much easier way to continiously prosecute claims is by filing for reconsideration/readjudication of a prior VA decision. Typically, claimants have one year from the date of notification of a VA decision to either file an appeal or request reconsideration of the prior decision with new and material evidence. This is evidence which has not previously been considered and may serve to overturn prior decisions.

If new and material evidence is received within the appellate period for any decision which has not become final the provisions of 38 C.F.R. 3.400(q) would be for application whereas the Court held, "VA must consider any new and material evidence received during the one-year appeal period following an RO decision as having been filed in connection with the claim which was pending at the beginning of the appeal period." See also Rice v. Shinseki, 22 Vet.App. 477 (2009).

Generally claimant's are unaware of the evidence required for a favorable decision, however, a proper VA Rating Decision (VARD) should provide adequate reasons and basis for the denial of any condition. Within a VARD there should be discussion of evidence considered in the service medical records, the evidence submitted, and findings of any VA examination to include rationale of the examiner as to why or why not a nexus opinion is given in regard to service connection.

Equally, the most common reason for a denial is not for lack of in-service treatment, or evidence of a current disability, but the medical opinion relating that condition to service.

Generally service connection requires (1) evidence of an in-service, injury, disease, or event, whic was caused, incurred or aggravated in the line of duty, (2) a current chronic or disabling condition, and (3) a competent medical opinion relating the two to service.

Of the claimant can overcome a VA medical opinion with a competent medical opinion, which is as equally thorough or greater in probative value than that of a VA examiner, then the claim should be reconsidered and granted. This can be accomplished by asking for reconsideration of the prior decision, and effective dates should be assigned accordingly. This technique can win cases in a much faster fashion than electing to file an appeal, which in the send will requires the same type of evidence for a claimant to prevail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Welcome to Hadit. In a perfect world the VA would follow its own rules. Like it or not if you don't ask specifically and show VA why the chances of winning in early stages are not so good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly agree that a reconsider might resolve a claims issues faster than a NOD.

But that depends on whether the VA will act on the request within the NOD time frame.

I feel everyone filing for Reconsideration should mark their calendar-as the year can slip by fast-to make sure the NOD is filed on time.

I filed for reconsideration and had to send them my NOD within days of the NOD year deadline as they had ignored the request.

Also if the VA made a CUE a veteran can ask them to CUE themselves during the appellate period.But that too still means the NOD clock is ticking.

New and material evidence that would warrant a reconsideration cannot be redundant or cumulative of what they already have.

That evidence could include anything they did not list as evidence on the SOC.

If they don't list it as evidence and opine on it in the SOC, to me it means they ignored it or lost it and it might be critical to the claim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand there is long back log-especially those claims for reconsideration. Do you have any insight as to the new length of time once a reconsideration claim is with the rating board what the new time frame is? It used to be up to 28 days. Thank you. And again, welcome to this forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a claim is reopened within the appellate period, the claim is considered to have been continuously prosecuted. This means there will be no expiration of the prior claim for failure to respond or file an NOD, because in essence, you have and the request is governed by 3.156b, and 3.160.

In my VARO appeals take 2 years for De Novo or Traditional Review, the latter of which is merely a review if the prior decision and is IMHO useless. Reopened claims take 6-9 months currently.

We coomunicate with our VA counterparts to gain an understanding of current workflow, and actively work to streamline our clients claims to be "Ready to Rate". We also use the FDC claim process to expedite new claims and claims for reconsideration with additional evidence.

***FDC claims will not work for issues which have become final and require N&ME to be considered formally reopened, this is due to VCAA notification requirements.***

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a claim is reopened within the appellate period, the claim is considered to have been continuously prosecuted. This means there will be no expiration of the prior claim for failure to respond or file an NOD, because in essence, you have and the request is governed by 3.156b, and 3.160.

In my VARO appeals take 2 years for De Novo or Traditional Review, the latter of which is merely a review if the prior decision and is IMHO useless. Reopened claims take 6-9 months currently.

We coomunicate with our VA counterparts to gain an understanding of current workflow, and actively work to streamline our clients claims to be "Ready to Rate". We also use the FDC claim process to expedite new claims and claims for reconsideration with additional evidence.

***FDC claims will not work for issues which have become final and require N&ME to be considered formally reopened, this is due to VCAA notification requirements.***

Re-opened claims-that would apply to clams re-opened for reconsideration? Mine was placed for reconsideration due to missed medical information. ( in AZ) From what I understand from your post I'll expect to get a decision within 6-9 months, not the normal up to 28 days that was previously the norm before the agent orange claims opened up. I had my reconsideration claim sent in October 2010. It went to the rating board in November. Does the 6-9 months commence from the date refiled, or the date once it hits the rating board. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now