vlb-all-products

vlb-c-file-manual


  • Topics

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      16,017
    • Most Online
      3,604

    Newest Member
    inthesouthoftexas
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      61,365
    • Total Posts
      395,805
  • Posts

    • And, attached are the redacted docs. Claim Details 8-27-16.pdf Dr Ltr SC for OSA.pdf
    • Hi- My claim was only reevaluated at the 6 year mark when I added a Secondary claim.  I am 59, and only had my rating since 2012 ( I retired in 1997) did not file till 2010.  So I am still a newbie, others may have different experiences.   
    • Good afternoon, just an update which I hope help others. received unfit rating of 70%  for PTSD and placed on TRDL took 13 months start to finish sine referred to USCG med board I submitted a claim for knee,back pes Cavus bilaterally,Ed secondary to PTSD meds and just received cpap and DBQ from Md for sleep apnea thanks again to all at HADIT very respectfully  
    • If they back it up with sound rationale then it will be fine. A doctor is a doctor, all other things being equal, though if your civilian doc is a spine doc, for example, it would have more weight than, say, a general practitioner or family medicine doc if put in equipose to a VA spine doctor. 
    • Thanks everyone! i received the BBE today, In my case, the BWE......all it states is my current 30% rating and that they need the DBQ for bladder and they are ready to make the award decision.  it just says deferred on PTSD/MST and bladder until C&P exam for bladder is complete.  i received the retro pay in the bank today.  All i can do is wait now.  I want to also ask the question about grinding of teeth that has been caused by PTSD and stress. I want to also claim that. What do i do for that? i have a private dentist that confirmed that.  i guess they will want a claim for that, but i am not doing a damn thing until all this PTSD stuff is done.  Also, they said in the BWE that they considered all evidence pertaining to the MST (buddy letters, service records, medical records and all. the list was 2 pages long of stuff they are considering}...i wanted to ask if i should go to my private urologist that wrote the letter for my SSDI if she would write a letter confirming that my PTSD has made the bladder condition 100 times worse. if she writes that letter, will that be something i should bring to the C&P exam? i already have two letters from her, but they don't mention PTSD.... what does everyone think? @Gastone @Buck52 @Berta i truly value all your opinions and sorry if i have been jumpy! i need help with this whole process.  Love to you all, Floridanurse





Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
USCG CWO4

Does Anyone Know Why Its Longer For More Complex Claims?

16 posts in this topic

I recently retired and submitted my BDD claim. There were multiple items claimed and from what I have read it will take longer to get my claim processed. As a matter of fact they estimate late Dec 2012 to April of 2013 and I filed and had my C & P exam in February but my retirement date was 01 May. I understand that it will take longer for my claim because there are more items and its more difficult, but do they take the easier claims and put them on top of the pile? Don't they process claims in the order in which they are received? If so this would mean all claims would take about the same amount of time.

I am a patient man so I understand it will take time, just curious about the process.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Not to be a smartass, but the title to your post answers the question it asks...In my experience though, they're not "supposed" to put more difficult claims at the bottom of the pile, they work them in order in which they were received. Now, I know many members here may flame me, but remember, that's how it is "supposed" to work!!

Semper Fi!

P.S. I've been waiting on a very simple dependents claim now for the better part of a year, so I hope you are a vvvvveeeerrryyy patient man...!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Complex = lots more to do!

I initially filed with help from the state commission on vets affairs, and the guy wrote it up with a whole lot of claims... depression, anxiety, back problems, sleep problems... on and on. This was not smart, it just confuses the raters (it shouldn't but it does...) I eventually filed for reconsideration after being denied outright. On the second round, I had some assistance from a social worker in the PTSD unit who focused on this.

When I was finally awarded, it was for PTSD solely. All else either fell under this category or was ignored. So, yes, simple and bare bones probably stands a better chance. If the rater is very responsible and attentive, and there are lots of contentions, then they have to follow through on a number of things, C&Ps for several issues, etc. If they are NOT as responsible as they should be it just looks like work!

I would say, don't ignore serious issues, but it is probably to your benefit to keep it as simple as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I thought was happening. It's an extract from the NY Times article from June.

http://www.nytimes.c...ner=rss&emc=rss

"The employees also complained about the performance review process used to measure their productivity, saying it reduced the quality of work and hurt morale. The process requires claims processors to complete a certain number of files per day. People who fall short can be denied promotions or fired. Those who meet or exceed quotas become eligible for bonuses.

The workers said those quotas encourage processors to take shortcuts that often lead to mistakes, or to focus on easier cases over complex ones. And when in doubt, processors tend to deny claims, the workers said, because denials are generally faster."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I saw this. On one of the other well known websites, a moderator who alleges he was a DRO trainer gave an entirely different view point suggesting that Va employees erroneously award benefits because its faster than a denial.

While I knew this former DRO was feeding us with KRAP, I was pleased to get it refuted by employees who work there. It makes me wonder what else this DRO posted when he knew it was false.

A denial has to be faster. There are no calculations and retro to figure out, and multiple signatures are not required for a denial. They simply "cut and paste" the letter, and fill in a reasons and bases for denial. While awards also have a "reasons and bases", a Veteran is unlikely to ever dispute the "reasons" your benefits were awarded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that the more you claim the longer it takes to get the claim settled. Claims are worked first in first out... but that does not mean that a claim that was submitted after your claim is decided after your claim.. it means you claim is started first and however long it takes to connect the dots is how long it takes to get a decision. It happends a lot that a newer claim is decided before older ones and this happends because some claims are submitted with everything necessary to decide it. while other claims are received with no information and the VA has to get medical records, and request c/p exams.

As to a denial being harder than an approval.... this is true!

Approvals are really easier because to get an approval all the facts are know and the facts justify the award

Denials however must be justified......they are not faster....

And I doubt that few awards are ever given if a denial is warranted, but ironically many denials that turn out to be incorrect.....

Just like that effeciency report we got in the Army (EER, SEER etc... ) the rater must justify his comments with facts, it is a lot eaiser to tell the truth and rate correctly that it is to make something up and rate down....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0