·If the issue of deemed-valid marriage arises involving a same-sex relationship, request assistance from Regional Counsel in determining whether a deemed-valid marriage exists.Follow the instructions in M21-1, Part III, Subpart iii, 5.A.3.e for requesting an opinion from Regional Council.
·When calculating years of marriage pursuant to 38 CFR 3.54, use the date the marriage was performed, not the date the marriage could first be recognized for the purpose of VA benefits.
Reference:For more information on a deemed valid marriage and the lack of knowledge of an impediment, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart iii, 5.E.8.
(M21 1MR kicks back to 38 CFR 3.54 which has been updated as of Nov 2015 and there is still the one year marriage requirement)
Also common law marriages are recognized by VA as explained in this remand:
There is a lot to many DIC claims.Some can go through the VA fairly easily but others can become quite convoluted.
The appellant above was reimbursed for burial fees but was remanded because it appeared she also was the common law wife for VA purposes such as DIC and is on remand to clarify that.
The appellant was also represented by an "agent" who apparently didn't realize she should have formally filed for DIC and then sent to VA the info they needed to prove that. She lived in Utah , a common law state. Also it is an 1151 issue and I sure hope the "agent " has a clue on those types of claims, too.
Question
Berta
A brief overview of the DIC regulations appears in this thread:
http://community.hadit.com/topic/60791-dic-overview/
Notes:
· If the issue of deemed-valid marriage arises involving a same-sex relationship, request assistance from Regional Counsel in determining whether a deemed-valid marriage exists. Follow the instructions in M21-1, Part III, Subpart iii, 5.A.3.e for requesting an opinion from Regional Council.
· When calculating years of marriage pursuant to 38 CFR 3.54, use the date the marriage was performed, not the date the marriage could first be recognized for the purpose of VA benefits.
Reference: For more information on a deemed valid marriage and the lack of knowledge of an impediment, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart iii, 5.E.8.
(M21 1MR kicks back to 38 CFR 3.54 which has been updated as of Nov 2015 and there is still the one year marriage requirement)
Also common law marriages are recognized by VA as explained in this remand:
http://www.va.gov/vetapp15/Files1/1501601.txt
There is a lot to many DIC claims.Some can go through the VA fairly easily but others can become quite convoluted.
The appellant above was reimbursed for burial fees but was remanded because it appeared she also was the common law wife for VA purposes such as DIC and is on remand to clarify that.
The appellant was also represented by an "agent" who apparently didn't realize she should have formally filed for DIC and then sent to VA the info they needed to prove that. She lived in Utah , a common law state. Also it is an 1151 issue and I sure hope the "agent " has a clue on those types of claims, too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
Popular Days
Nov 15
2
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 1 post
Navy04 1 post
Popular Days
Nov 15 2015
2 posts
Popular Posts
Berta
My recent post disappeared and I didnt dave a copy but this will do: . A brief overview of the DIC regulations appears in this thread: http://community.hadit.com/topic/60791-dic-overview/ Notes:
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now