Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

 Ask Your VA Claims Question  

 Read Current Posts 

  Read Disability Claims Articles 
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users |  Search  | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

What Ischemic Heart Disease

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Ischemic heart disease, as a new AO presumptive, will certainly bring many more Agent Orange claims into the VA system.

With proof of AO exposure these claims should be very easy for the VA to rate and award.

The biggest problem with these claims that I foresee is that the VA will not have adequate evidence to determine IHD as many vets with IHD might have CAD or CHF in their records as well as other medical terms that in fact mean IHD diagnosis -but maybe the VA could misinterpret this.Or a C & P doctor could opine inaccurately on this AO disease.

I was talking to notable Vets lawyer Doug Rosinki a few weeks ago ago who had answered a vets question as to CHF-Congestive Heart Failure -which may not be ischemic heart disease at all. In his opinion-as ischemia has certain medical facets unlike other types of cardiomyopathy.He is right.

Terms like atherosclerosis, hyperlipedimia, peripheral aterial disease are some key medical terms that might most l;ifely indicate the type of heart disease one could have is, in fact, ischemia.

IHD is a broad term and accounts for the most prevalent type of heart disease in the USA.

However the new regs hopefully will define this disease better and hopefully veterans will not have problems proving they have this type of heart disease due to AO exposure.

Caused by cholesterol deposits, which block arteries, ischemic (is-KEY-mic) heart disease, also called coronary artery disease or coronary heart disease, is still the single biggest cause of death in the United States, killing nearly 500,000 Americans each year. But the situation is changing. According to a study in the Sept. 25, 1998, New England Journal of Medicine, deaths from coronary heart disease dropped 28 percent among men and 31 percent among women between 1987 and 1994 alone. This drop is primarily due to improved care.

An estimated 14 million people in the United States have ischemic heart disease. Of these, as many as 4 million have few or no symptoms and are unaware that they are at risk for angina (angina pectoris), heart attack (myocardial infarction), or sudden death.

Angina Pectoris

Plaque deposits on the interior linings of the heart’s arteries lie at the root of <a href="http://www.acc.org/media/patient/chd/glossary.htm#angina">angina pectoris. The narrowed arteries prevent the heart from getting enough oxygen during exercise and the person experiences a chest pain beneath the breast bone—this pain is called angina pectoris. Mild or intense, the discomfort usually lasts only a few minutes. Every year, an estimated 350,000 new cases of angina occur. Today, angina pectoris can be dramatically reduced or eliminated by medications, heart surgery, or balloon dilation of narrowed arteries.”

From:http://www.acc.org/media/patient/chd/ischemic.htm

“Silent Ischemia and Ischemic Heart Disease

What is ischemia?

Ischemia (is-KE'me-ah) is a condition in which the blood flow (and thus oxygen) is restricted to a part of the body. Cardiac ischemia is the name for lack of blood flow and oxygen to the heart muscle.

What is ischemic heart disease?

It's the term given to heart problems caused by narrowed heart arteries. When arteries are narrowed, less blood and oxygen reaches the heart muscle. This is also called coronary artery disease and coronary heart disease. This can ultimately lead to heart attack.

Ischemia often causes chest pain or discomfort known as angina pectoris (AN'jih-nah or an-JI'nah PEK'tor-is).

What is silent ischemia?

As many as 3 to 4 million Americans may have ischemic episodes without knowing it. These people have ischemia without pain — silent ischemia. They may have a heart attack with no prior warning. People with angina also may have undiagnosed episodes of silent ischemia. In addition, people who have had previous heart attacks or those with diabetes are especially at risk for developing silent ischemia.

Having an exercise stress test or wearing a Holter monitor – a battery-operated portable tape recording that measures and records your electrocardiogram (e-lek"tro-KAR'de-o-gram [ECG]) continuously, usually for 24-48 hours – are two tests often used to diagnose this problem. Other tests also may be used.

From:http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4720

Ischemic cardiomyopathy results when the arteries that bring blood and oxygen to the heart are blocked. There may be a buildup of cholesterol and other substances, called plaque, in the arteries that bring oxygen to heart muscle tissue. Over time, the heart muscle does not work well, and it is more difficult for the heart to fill and release blood.

Ischemic cardiomyopathy is a common cause of congestive heart failure. Patients with this condition may at one time have had a heart attack, angina, or unstable angina. A few patients may not have noticed any previous symptoms.

Ischemic cardiomyopathy is the most common type of cardiomyopathy in the United States. It affects approximately 1 out of 100 people, most often middle-aged to elderly men.”

From:

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000160.htm

also

Diabetic ischemic cardiomyopathy can cause a heart attack without a level of pain that would indicate heart attack. An EKG can immediately reveal whether this was silent ischemic heart attack or not.

Also severe peripheral neuropathy and arterial disease is another factor that can limit the amount of pain a heart attack victim can have.

None of this information is meant to alarm anyone.

But we and our significant others need to be aware of these things.

And AO vets filing for Ischemic heart disease might find this information helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"High blood gluclose at time of heart attack"

Often diabetes is only diagnosed when someone has a heart attack-if they had been getting regular medical care however with blood work etc, it can certainly be diagnosed sooner than when a heart attack occurs.

Any serious event such as heart attack or stroke can raise blood sugar temporarily. One high reading cannot determine diabetes.. Mine was high last year when I had a severe infection.It dropped down as soon as the intravenous antibiotic got into my system.

The ADA criteria changed in 1997 for diabetes.

I cant reply on my memory but I think it involves 3 readings of glucose at 126 or higher.

OGTT tests and HBIAC tests are good indicators of full blown diabetes too- the criteria is definitely here somewhere but maybe I better find it and post it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"High blood gluclose at time of heart attack"

Often diabetes is only diagnosed when someone has a heart attack-if they had been getting regular medical care however with blood work etc, it can certainly be diagnosed sooner than when a heart attack occurs.

Any serious event such as heart attack or stroke can raise blood sugar temporarily. One high reading cannot determine diabetes.. Mine was high last year when I had a severe infection.It dropped down as soon as the intravenous antibiotic got into my system.

The ADA criteria changed in 1997 for diabetes.

I cant reply on my memory but I think it involves 3 readings of glucose at 126 or higher.

OGTT tests and HBIAC tests are good indicators of full blown diabetes too- the criteria is definitely here somewhere but maybe I better find it and post it again.

Thanks for the reply Miss Berta, the finding of high sugar in 2005 was my private cardioglist asking if I was dieabetic in July when I was hospitalized for the stents, my gluclose level was 257 fasting. We started looking at past blood work and since 2005 and we found 12 different levels higher than 117 one at 242. Five of these tests that were abnormal was in the VA health system. But not at one clinic, Waco, San Francisco, Winston=Salem, ect. I move around alot. Just never thought I might have Diabetes, he did make a dianosis of Diabetes II and was forwarded with claim. Unfortanutly I did not appeal heart diasese claim. On advise of present service officer filed new claim and hope to fall under the Nehmer ruling. After note; I also have a claim for PTSD, and trying real hard not to use that as excuse for not following through with some of this. Took a huge step to just admit that I just might be in need of help to get past the past. Sorry didn't mean to digress, but real hard to talk about stuff, thankfully I have found a group that at least understands (Hadit.com). The system sure likes to grind ya down into dust, hopeing you will just go away, not this time I am mad not just angry.Again sorry for the rambleing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this involves ischemic heart disease (which I think you already said it did- I see under Nehmer the possibility for the heart disease retro to go back to the date you filed the original claim for CAD that was denied.

It definitely sounds like the VA missed a proper DMII diagnosis and you could certainly file a Section 1151 claim on that. You could ask for the earliest date on the DMII that VA should have diagnosed your diabetes.

I am not sure it that would produce the best EED-however- this is almost like my AO claim.

I couldnt file a second 1151 due to the additional malpractice I found regarding DMII so I re-opened my older DIC claim which produced an EED of 1994- but in many other respects your claim is similiar-

I am not sure just how the 1151 could bring proper retro but I do suggest that you ask them to develop and award the 1151 claim based on the auspices of Nehmer.

They awarded a widow at the BVA accrued SMC under Nehmer (another claim I too have pending for SMC accrued)

so Nehmer, with its unusual EED aspect Might help you recover a proper EED.

I hope others chime in here.

You could also file a FTCA claim against them if you learned of the negligence within the last 2 years.It looks here however that 2 years has passed already after the doc discovered the DMII.

"he did make a diagnosis of Diabetes II and was forwarded with claim."

What was the date of this diagnosis?

How did the VA interpret this (or reject it) in the SOC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use