Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
- 0
hypertension Some Interestings C&ue Claims For Research
Rate this question
Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
Rate this question
Question
carlie
http://www4.va.gov/vetapp09/files3/0919324.txt
ORDER
The rating decision of December 1962 contained clear and
unmistakable error by assigning an effective date of June 11,
1962 for the grant of service connection for a right shoulder
disorder, and an effective date of August 10, 1949 is
granted.
http://www4.va.gov/vetapp09/files4/0926735.txt
ORDER
Severance of entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A.
§ 1151 for headaches was not proper, and restoration of the
benefit is granted.
Severance of entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A.
§ 1151 for a right elbow olecranon contusion was not proper,
and restoration of the benefit is granted.
The following BVA decision does not grant C&UE for anything
but I find the claim very interesting as it shows many different
issues and the why's of why the claims for C&UE have been denied.
This is a long read but worth it for the research.
http://www4.va.gov/vetapp09/files4/0928574.txt
ORDER
There was no clear and unmistakable error in VA Form 21-526,
Veteran's Application for Compensation or Pension, submitted
in February 1945, addressing "Nature of Disease/Injury" for
accrued purposes, and such claim is denied.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the February 26,
1945, letter from the United States Coast Guard stating the
Veteran was discharged due to "physical disability" for
accrued purposes, and such claim is denied.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the March 1945
Rating Sheet stating the Veteran's discharge diagnosis was
Constitutional Psychopathic State and VA was to determine
"true diagnosis" for accrued purposes, and such claim is
denied.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945 VA
Medical Form 2545, Report of Physical Examination stating,
"Illnesses - none" and "Operations - Sinus 1942 Nasal Drip
left side 1943" for accrued purposes, and such claim is
denied.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945 VA
Medical Form 2545, Report of Physical Examination in
paragraphs 10, 11, 12, and 13 for accrued purposes, and such
claim is denied.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945 VA
Medical Form 2545, Report of Physical Examination showing a
history of "Constitutional psychopathic state, emotional
instability, had been nervous all of his life, his hands
always shook, he never slept well," and such claim is denied
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945
rating decision, which assigned a 10 percent evaluation for
psychoneurosis, anxiety neurosis, for accrued purposes, and
such claim is dismissed.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945
rating decision denying service connection for constitutional
psychopath with emotional instability for accrued purposes,
and such claim is dismissed.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945
rating decision, which failed to adjudicate claims for
service connection that were reflected in the Veteran's
service treatment records for accrued purposes, and such
claim is dismissed.
There was no was clear and unmistakable error in the April
1947 rating decision reducing the evaluation for
psychoneurosis, anxiety, to noncompensable for accrued
purposes, and such claim is dismissed.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the April 1947
rating decision noting that the diagnosis of constitutional
psychopath with emotional instability was a constitutional or
developmental defect for VA purposes for accrued purposes,
and such claim is dismissed.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in VA's failure to
adjudicate a 1969 claim for increase and a claim for service
connection for hearing loss for accrued purposes, and such
claim is denied.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in VA's failure to
adjudicate a 1971 claim for increase for accrued purposes,
and such claim is denied.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in a January 1977
VA neuropsychiatric screening examination report referencing
a November 1976 report, for accrued purposes, and such claim
is denied.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in VA's failure to
adjudicate an August 1976 claim for increase for accrued
purposes, and such claim is denied.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the December
1977 rating decision denying service connection for hearing
loss for accrued purposes, and such claim is dismissed.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the October 1994
rating decision denying service connection for multiple
sclerosis for accrued purposes, and such claim is dismissed.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the October 1994
rating decision denying reopening the claim for entitlement
to service connection for hearing loss for accrued purposes,
and such claim is dismissed.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the October 1994
rating decision denying service connection for hypertension,
and such claim is dismissed.
There was no clear and unmistakable error in the October 1994
rating decision denying service connection for tachycardia,
and such claim is dismissed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
Dec 11
1
Top Posters For This Question
carlie 1 post
Popular Days
Dec 11 2009
1 post
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now