Jump to content

Ads

  • Search

  • 0
BasehorVet

Is This Cue? Denied Comp For In Line Of Duty Injury That Resulted In 35-4 Medical Discharge For Permenant Disability W 10% Rating

Question

I thought I would pose this question to the CUE experts and see what their thoughts and advice would be. Bottom line is that I was discharged from the USAF in 1985 under a medical discharge 35-4 with a narrative reason for separation on my DD214 as "Discharge by reason of physical disability with entitlement to severance pay". My original DD214 was replaced with a DD215 that is dated 3 weeks after my date of discharge because it had the wrong SS#, last week I filed for another change using a form 149 to correct the separation code on the DD214 from the incorrect JFL to the Air Force specific JFL1.

I was injured in the line of duty and have a Line of Duty Determination AFR 35-67 in my medical files and in my possession.

I have a Form 88 Report of Medical Examination for the MEB which states Recurrent back pain 1981 to present (form dated 02 Aug 84) due to fall, treated with back brace and physical therapy, diagnosed a facet syndrome with myofacial chronic pain pattern.

I have a AF Form 356 Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board that states 1. Facet Syndrome, Lumbar spine, with low back pain. Unfitting yes, Due to misconduct No, Incurred while entitled to basic pay yes, Degree of impairment is permanent yes, Percent 10% Va diagnostic code 5299-5295.

I failed to appeal the decision dated July 28 1985 and according to my American Legion advocate it was then finalized after one year and it is not possible to claim back pay for compensation based upon the original denial of benefits.

The notification letter stated:

"We have carefully considered your REOPENED claim for service connection of hearing loss and back disability.

We have found it necessary to deny service connection for your back disability because this condition, under existing laws, cannot be classified as a disease or injury. The law allows payment only for benefits only for those disabilities which do result from disease or injury."

I do not know why it states reopened claim, this was the first claim filed upon separation from service.

I did some research and found this tidbit:

Title 38: Pensions, Bonuses, and Veterans' Relief

PART 3—ADJUDICATION

Subpart A—Pension, Compensation, and Dependency and

Indemnity Compensation

General § 3.1 Definitions.

(k) Service-connected means, with respect to disability or death, that such disability was incurred or aggravated, or that the death resulted from a disability incurred or aggravated, in line of duty in the active military, naval, or air service.

(m) In line of duty means an injury or disease incurred or aggravated during a period of active military, naval, or air service unless such injury or disease was the result of the veteran's own willful misconduct or, for claims filed after October 31, 1990, was a result of his or her abuse of alcohol or drugs. A service department finding that injury, disease or death occurred in line of duty will be binding on the Department of Veterans Affairs unless it is patently inconsistent with the requirements of laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Requirements as to line of duty are not met if at the time the injury was suffered or disease contracted the veteran was:

(1) Avoiding duty by desertion, or was absent without leave which materially interfered with the performance of military duty.

(2) Confined under a sentence of court-martial involving an unremitted dishonorable discharge.

(3) Confined under sentence of a civil court for a felony as determined under the laws of the jurisdiction where the person was convicted by such court.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 105)

To me this means that since the claim was denied that it conflicted with the rules established that the in the line of duty determination binds the VA to recognize the disability and compensate for it. After this decision was made which is in conflict of the laws and rules then anything after that should not have been adjudicated based upon:

§ 20.1403 Rule 1403. What constitutes clear and unmistakable error; what does not.

(a) General. Clear and unmistakable error is a very specific and rare kind of error. It is the kind of error, of fact or of law, that when called to the attention of later reviewers compels the conclusion, to which reasonable minds could not differ, that the result would have been manifestly different but for the error. Generally, either the correct facts, as they were known at the time, were not before the Board, or the statutory and regulatory provisions extant at the time were incorrectly applied.

I have a request to reopen the claim based on new and material evidence, I had a comp exam last week and scheduled for a MRI in two weeks. The exam nurse indicated to my doctor that I needed x-rays of my hips and I had them done on Friday. So it looks like my claim will be addressed as it should have been 25 years ago and I will be awarded some comp rating.

Any thoughts about my legal musings? Do you think that a clear and unmistakable error of fact or law exists?

Victor

You can find additional information such as the evidence I submitted to reopen my claim at the following hadit post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

How do you know you are going to be granted a VA disability? You were denied a rating in 1985 and now you come again with new evidence to reopen your claim, but how do you know you are going to get the grant? The only way to get an earlier effective date is to do a CUE most likely. Did the VA have all your SMR's and other medical evidence when they denied your claim in 1985?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad


Basehorvet,

So, what exactly are you stating is a CUE by the VBA ?

What exactly was stated, in a final, unappealed Rating Decision that you are filing a CUE claim on ?

It has to be a legal error, clear and concise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advise on the actual issue, Why did they deny it.

More info is needed for a confirmative answer to the cue scenario.

J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would base my CUE claim on

Title 38: Pensions, Bonuses, and Veterans' Relief

PART 3—ADJUDICATION

Subpart A—Pension, Compensation, and Dependency and Indemnity Compensation

Which states that A service department (USAF Physical Evaluation Board in my case) finding that injury, disease or death occurred in line of duty will be binding on the Department of Veterans Affairs.

To me this is interpreted as the VA must award me a compensation rating of at least 0% on an injury that occured in the line of duty.

The only statement I have from the VA is the denial letter for my claim in 1985 which states

"We have found it necessary to deny service connection for your back disability because this condition, under existing laws, cannot be classified as a disease or injury. The law allows payment only for benefits only for those disabilities which do result from disease or injury."

The CUE would be based on the fact that they did not follow the law and recognize the disability. My interpretation is that since I was discharged by the USAF by reason of physical disability that the VA is bound to recognize the disability. They did not recognize the disability, which means that they refused to be bound by the law, which should have stopped the adjudication process but since it didn't then the adjudication process should be null and void and the original date of the application of claim considered based upon the law of line of duty determination.

I am not a wizard at this but common sense indicates to me that if a vet is discharged by a service organization for a disability then the VA should also recognize the disability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would base my CUE claim on

Title 38: Pensions, Bonuses, and Veterans' Relief

PART 3—ADJUDICATION

Subpart A—Pension, Compensation, and Dependency and Indemnity Compensation

Which states that A service department (USAF Physical Evaluation Board in my case) finding that injury, disease or death occurred in line of duty will be binding on the Department of Veterans Affairs.

To me this is interpreted as the VA must award me a compensation rating of at least 0% on an injury that occured in the line of duty.

The only statement I have from the VA is the denial letter for my claim in 1985 which states

"We have found it necessary to deny service connection for your back disability because this condition, under existing laws, cannot be classified as a disease or injury. The law allows payment only for benefits only for those disabilities which do result from disease or injury."

The CUE would be based on the fact that they did not follow the law and recognize the disability. My interpretation is that since I was discharged by the USAF by reason of physical disability that the VA is bound to recognize the disability. They did not recognize the disability, which means that they refused to be bound by the law, which should have stopped the adjudication process but since it didn't then the adjudication process should be null and void and the original date of the application of claim considered based upon the law of line of duty determination.

I am not a wizard at this but common sense indicates to me that if a vet is discharged by a service organization for a disability then the VA should also recognize the disability.

Basehorvet,

VA 101 - Throw common sense out the window - it does not apply to the VBA adjudication process.

In regards to the 1985 denial which states,"We have found it necessary to deny service connection for your back disability because this condition, under existing laws, cannot be classified as a disease or injury."

What is the medical terminology that was used for this specific back disability ?

What Evidence is listed in the Evidence Section of the Rating Decision ?

The generic, plain old term back disability does not in and of itself address any specific disability.

Heck it could be a scar on the back - disc herniation - etc...., it could be a number of issues.

In regards to a claim of CUE,

"The CUE would be based on the fact that they did not follow the law and recognize the disability."

This would just be a denial right out the door, there is nothing specific here, no 38 CFR reg, no 38 USC reg/law shown to support

a grant for a CUE claim.

In regards to,

"They did not recognize the disability, which means that they refused to be bound by the law, which should have stopped the adjudication process but since it didn't then the adjudication process should be null and void and the original date of the application of claim considered based upon the law of line of duty determination."

No - it should not have "stopped the adjudication process" - - it should have been CONSIDERED in the adjudication process to help support

a grant for disability benefits.

It might help to keep in mind that a service member can certainly be discharged for an ailment that does not result

in residual disability even just a few months down the road.

jmho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Advertisemnt


  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • If you are a Veteran, represented by MOPH, you need to know that MOPH is closing down its offices.  This can have a drastic effect on your claim, and it wont be good for you.  You likely need to get a new representative.  

      This station confirms MOPH is closing its doors:

      http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--Purple-Heart-veterans-service-center-to-close-its-doors-480422933.html

       
      • 0 replies
    • Retroactive Back Pay.
      Retroactive Back Pay - #1Viewed Post Week of March 19. 2018

      My claim is scheduled to close tomorrow for my backpay.
      Does anyone know if it does close how long till the backpay hits the bank?
      Also does information only get updated on our claims whenever the site is down?
      • 44 replies
    • Examining your service medical records...
      * First thing I do after receiving a service medical record is number each page when I get to the end I go back and add 1 of 100 and so on.

      * Second I then make a copy of my service medical records on a different color paper, yellow or buff something easy to read, but it will distinguish it from the original.

      * I then put my original away and work off the copy.

      * Now if you know the specific date it's fairly easy to find. 

      * If on the other hand you don't know specifically or you had symptoms leading up to it. Well this may take some detective work and so Watson the game is afoot.

      * Let's say it's Irritable Syndrome 

      * I would start page by page from page 1, if the first thing I run across an entry that supports my claim for IBS, I number it #1, I Bracket it in Red, and then on a separate piece of paper I start to compile my medical evidence log. So I would write Page 10 #1 and a brief summary of the evidence, do this has you go through all the your medical records and when you are finished you will have an index and easy way to find your evidence. 

      Study your diagnosis symptoms look them up. Check common medications for your IBS and look for the symptoms noted in your evidence that seem to point to IBS, if your doctor prescribes meds for IBS, but doesn't call it that make those a reference also.
      • 9 replies
    • How to get your questions answered on the forum
      Do not post your question in someone else's thread. If you are reading a topic that sounds similar to your question, start a new topic and post your question. When you add your question to a topic someone else started both your questions get lost in the thread. So best to start your own thread so you can follow your question and the other member can follow theirs.

      All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. Read the forums without registering, to post you must register it’s free. Register for a free account.

      Tips on posting on the forums.

      Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery” instead of ‘I have a question’.


      Knowledgable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title. I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.


      Use paragraphs instead of one huge, rambling introduction or story. Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.



      Leading to:

      Post clear questions and then give background info on them.



      Examples:

      A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?



      I was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine but claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?




      B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?


      I was involved in traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?





      This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial from your claim?” etc.

      Note:

      Your firsts posts on the board may be delayed before they show up, as they are reviewed, this process does not take long and the review requirement will be removed usually by the 6th post, though we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.

      This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before they hit the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims and this helps us do that.
      • 2 replies
    • I have a 30% hearing loss and 10% Tinnitus rating since 5/17.  I have Meniere's Syndrome which was diagnosed by a VA facility in 2010 yet I never thought to include this in my quest for a rating.  Meniere's is very debilitating for me, but I have not made any noise about it because I could lose my license to drive.  I am thinking of applying for additional compensation as I am unable to work at any meaningful employment as I cannot communicate effectively because of my hearing and comprehension difficulties.  I don't know whether to file for a TDUI, or just ask for additional compensation.  My county Veterans service contact who helped me get my current rating has been totally useless on this when I asked her for help.  Does anyone know which forms I should use?  There are so many different directions to proceed on this that I am confused.  Any help would be appreciated.  Vietnam Vet 64-67. 

Ads



How to get your questions answered.

All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. Read the forums without registering, to post you must register it’s free. Register for a free account.

Tips on posting on the forums.

  1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ ...
  2. Knowledgable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title ... 
  3. Use paragraphs instead of one huge, rambling introduction or story. Again – You want to make it easy for others to help ...
Continue Reading


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines