Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

VA Disability Claims Articles

Ask Your VA Claims Question | Current Forum Posts Search | Rules | View All Forums
VA Disability Articles | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users

  • hohomepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • 27-year-anniversary-leaderboard.png

    advice-disclaimer.jpg

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

60-Day Countdown Nears For Paying New 'ao' Claims

Rate this question


pacmanx1

Question

  • Moderator

60-Day Countdown Nears for Paying New 'AO' Claims

Tom Philpott | July 29, 2010

60-Day Countdown Nears for Paying New 'AO' Claims

The Department of Veterans Affairs likely will begin in October to pay thousands of disability claims to Vietnam veterans with ischemic heart disease, Parkinson's disease and B-cell leukemia -- illnesses newly associated with exposure to defoliants, including Agent Orange, used in that war.

A 60-day countdown to the day that VA can start compensating up to 86,000 veterans retroactively for these diseases will begin when VA publishes its final implementing regulation, which could be next week.

Congress sent a strong signal of support to these veterans in July when first the Senate and, on Tuesday, the House passed the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2010 (HR 4899) which included $13.4 billion for VA to pay the first wave of compensation claims for these diseases.

VA estimates this expansion of Agent Orange-related claims, which VA Secretary Eric Shinseki announced last October, will benefit over time more than 153,000 and cost more than $42 billion in its first decade of payments.

The White House's Office of Management and Budget is near to clearing the VA regulation through its last review hurdle. Once the final regulation is published in the Federal Register, Congress will have 60 days to review and possibly block the regulation.

Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) showed his intent to lead that review by adding language to the war supplemental stating that, as the Congressional Review Act requires, none of the $13.4 billion can be spent for 60 days. This gives Congress time to weigh the cost and review the science behind the decision.

Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii), chairman of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee on which Webb serves, has scheduled a Sept. 23 hearing where presumably VA officials and independent medical researchers will explain why these diseases should be compensable for any veteran who suffers from them and served even a day in Vietnam.

Webb has argued the VA is interpreting the Agent Orange Law of 1991 too liberally, linking ailments generally associated with aging to wartime exposures, and committing VA to billions of dollars in added compensation payment, because Congress chose to forfeit its own oversight responsibilities.

Webb notes that the 2001 decision linking Type II diabetes to Agent Orange has resulted in more than 220,000 veterans -- nearly one in 10 who served in Vietnam -- drawing disability compensation for an illness often associated with unhealthy diets, aging or family history.

That Congress kept $13.4 billion in the war supplemental to pay for expansion of Agent Orange presumptive diseases dampens prospects that Webb can block the regulation at this late hour. Since March, VA has been urging veterans with these diseases, or their survivors, to file claims immediately because payment will be retroactive to the claim filing date.

VA lawyers conceded to a federal appeals court last week that the department missed deadlines set in the Agent Orange Act for reviewing the latest science report and for publishing rules to expand claims eligibility to these diseases. Those missed deadlines spurred several advocacy groups for Vietnam veterans to mount a legal challenge to force VA to pay claims now.

VA lawyers are arguing the delays were unavoidable, given the complexity and "budgetary implications" involved. Also, they told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that the impact of the missed deadlines is minimized by the fact that payments, when they begin, will be retroactive to the date original claims were filed.

So the same groups who have filed the lawsuit, including Paralyzed Veterans of America and the Non-Commissioned Officers Association, can provide the relief they seek "by encouraging their members to file benefits claims immediately, thereby establishing an effective date for their benefits prior to publication of the final regulation," VA advised the appeals court.

Thomas E. Riley, an attorney for the veterans, conceded that veterans who have filed claims will get retroactive payments and thus are protected. But most eligible veterans haven't filed claims yet, aren't likely to until the regulation is published, and thus are losing out on months of payments.

"Out of 200,000 expected claims," the brief explains, "only 50,000 claims have been received so far. Thus 150,000 Vietnam veterans continue to be prejudiced by the VA's delay, and there is simply no basis for the VA's suggestion that petitioners 'can and have obtained' the relief they seek."

Barton F. Stichman, co-director of the National Veterans Legal Services Program in Washington D.C., also helped prepare the lawsuit. He disagrees with Webb that VA is applying the Agent Orange law more broadly than Congress intended by compensating for diseases often associated with aging. The facts don't support that analysis, Stichman said.

What scientists found for these diseases -- "sufficient evidence to suggest an association" to Agent Orange exposure -- "is the exact same characterization the National Academy of Sciences has used for all the other diseases previous VA secretaries have service-connected," Stichman said.

Also, he said, "there's nothing to indicate Congress was only thinking rare diseases would get this presumptive service connection." In fact, with every "fairly common disease" added to the Agent Orange presumptive list -- lung cancer in 1994, prostate cancer in 1996, Type-II diabetes in 2001 -- Congress not only didn't protest but it soon codified the decisions in the law.

"Whenever the VA added a new disease," Stichman said, Congress "would amend the Agent Orange Act to stick the disease into the law so that no future secretary could change the decision. They put the congressional seal of approval on the decision...That weakens [Webb's] argument."

To comment, e-mail milupdate@aol.com, write to Military Update, P.O. Box 231111, Centreville, VA, 20120-1111 or visit: www.militaryupdate.com.

How do you feel about this issue?

Let your public officials know how you feel.

Found on: military.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I doubt many if any vets will see their checks this soon.But I will try to contact Philpott to see where he got this info-

There is a criteria for these claims that will take time to process.

Has any AO vet here gotten the letter with the blank doctor's form for their doc to fill out -as described in the NVLSP link?

Has any AO vet here received a VCAA letter yet on a new AO claim under any of the new presumptives?

Personally I think the VA COULD start paying these claims fast if they waive the VCAA letter if the vet sends them ample evidence (or refers to ample evidence) in their medical records of any of the new AO disabilities.

I sent the VA with my claim -numerous documents proving my husband had IHD with CVAs contributng.

Most were from his medical records at VA and others were generated by FTCA Peer reviews. I included 2 IMOs that helped award my AO diabetes.

His ECHO report and 2 EKGs alone prove he had ischemic heart disease and it is also listed on his death certificate.

He never had treatment records for IHD as this was one of the conditions VA malpracticed on and only recognized as due to AO DMII fairly recently.

I don't think any vet with IHD has to send lots of treatment records for their IHD claim. VA -as the NVLSP link shows- is looking for certain things in the medical records: METS, EKGs, and ECHOs,etc.

What gets me about the VCAA letter-which is our most important DTA right we have- is that it can take months to even get a VCAA letter, and then it might ask the vet for what the vet sent in already with their claim.

If their Vietnam service is established by their DD 214, and with a diagnosis of IHD and a few records of proof- I think VA could save a lot of time on any obvious AO IHD clam by waiving (or asking vets to waive) the VCAA letter.

Just my opinion.

"A 60-day countdown to the day that VA can start compensating up to 86,000 veterans retroactively for these diseases will begin when VA publishes its final implementing regulation, which could be next week."

"Out of 200,000 expected claims," the brief explains, "only 50,000 claims have been received so far."

These figures don't make sense.

Where are the past denied IHD claims and those vets who the VA was supposed to contact?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom based this info on his prior articles on this issue adding:

"I am referring to claims already filed and ready to pay, and those that will be adjudicated and paid thereafter."

I asked NVLSP for any further clarification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To follow up:

One of the Nehmer Experts at NVLSP told me there is good chance that VA has done development of many IHD claims filed already and also- as within the link I posted from NVLSP- some vets will possibly be able to forego the C & P exam for IHD,saving much time.

It would be great if some of these claims get paid starting in October.

Has anyone here received the blank medical exam form from the VA for their IHD claim yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it rather amazing after going to senators Webb's official site. I can not find any mention of his, on this matter of the VA compensation for the new 3 disabilities. Guess for some reason he does not want people vets to know his position on this.

Hope he comes around the state soon so I can ask him first hand why he is doing this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think if you have a denial letter in hand dated 9-2006 (filed 2-2006) that clearly states ... yes, you were in Viet Nam, Yes, you do have Ischemic Heart disease, and yes, you do have a defibrillator implant. That is a claim that does not take a lot of working. We sent in all the medical release forms very quickly. He is not "cured", no one has removed the AICD implant! They have a copy of the denial letter. They did have trouble with one hospital releasing records. so we went to the hospital, paid for records and hand delivered them to the RO. There is no new evidence in his case. He still has IHD, still has the AICD, same address,same bank account, same meds, same wife and a the minor child is now 20. What could be so difficult about this case? Thanks Webb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use