I am wondering what is the best option, IME or an IMO, for wading through the VA's appellate process after a NOD has been filed?
Would it be wiser to go with a good quality IME examiner first, or just do an IMO with a records review, and then wait for the VA to decide to order any additional C&P's?
Part of me thinks that by going through a C&P process with DBQ's in obtaining an IME might be a time saver.
Question
MarkInTexas
I am wondering what is the best option, IME or an IMO, for wading through the VA's appellate process after a NOD has been filed?
Would it be wiser to go with a good quality IME examiner first, or just do an IMO with a records review, and then wait for the VA to decide to order any additional C&P's?
Part of me thinks that by going through a C&P process with DBQ's in obtaining an IME might be a time saver.
Thoughts or advice?
Mark
Link to comment
Top Posters For This Question
3
1
1
1
Popular Days
Aug 7
6
Top Posters For This Question
MarkInTexas 3 posts
john999 1 post
Philip Rogers 1 post
georgiapapa 1 post
Popular Days
Aug 7 2014
6 posts
Popular Posts
Philip Rogers
I think an IME, w/an IMO, carries more weight because they've actually seen you and given you an exam. The IMO is just the report. A paper review IMO can be done but doesn't carry the same evidence
john999
The IMO should be part of the IME if you want the best chance. Your doctor does the exam and then writes an opinion for you with VA buzz words and format. I have seen some beautiful IME/IMO reports
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts