MrPain7

November 13th is your date good luck...…...the battle is over now wait some more...……….

Hi MrPain7, Thank you for your donation of $20.00. We look forward to improving the forums with your donation. Thanks Veterans Affairs Disability Compensation Benefits Forums - HadIt.com Veterans

Ex-navy Musician: It's almost impossible to give an honest reply -But be happy and look at it as money in the bank with interest....Congratulations to you that should be a nice sum.........

you had problems with your feet during active service and was it documented if so appeal the denial the fact being the active service aggravated you Flatfeet which are worse after your tour then they were before you entered Are you seeing a podiatrist if not start seeing one compare your foot condition NOW to before you entered.

March, 13, 2015 was denied my petition for extraordinary relief In the nature of a writ of mandamus by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. it was denied what is this Judgment for??? Today I received a Judgment which only stated this.. The court has issued a decision in this case. The time allowed for motions under Rule 35 of the Courts Rules of Practice and Procedure has expired. Under Rule 36, judgment is entered and effective this date. Dated: June 22, 2015 That is all there was nothing else...anyone have any idea of what this means????

glider222: You are entitled to recieive SMC from 11/15/2001 you don't have to be P&T.........

Berta yes I was given a number 15-1245 with the Courts Order April 14, 2015.......

I received the respondent (Secretary of veterans Affairs) answer to my petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus and to the Courts order dated 04/14/2015. After reading threw there reply nothing was stated outside of what I have already mentioned to the Court.. My Question is What happens next ?? Do I wait for a reply from the CAVC...

Crazyhorse3022: yes i have SMC at the S-rate ..exactly what are you looking for????

The BVA remanded my claim for loss of use lower extremities to the RO via appeals management center 3/13/2014 the reason being they say the records show I have never been afforded a VA examination I filed this claim 12/2008 on 3/11/2010 i had a VA compensation & pension examination which has been totally OverLooked by the RO,reconsideration and the BVA. It was remanded from the CAVC 6/13/2013 informing them of there mistake . The Court states they made the error for overlooking the favorable evidence therefore i think a decision should be made with the overlooked evidence not a new examination. Below the Court Conclusion. The March 2010 VA examiner opined that Mr. xxxxxx had loss of use of his lower extremities that was related to his service-connected cervical and lumbar spine disabilities and painful feet. See R. at 801 ("It is at least as likely as not that the cervical condition is the cause of loss of use of the lower extremities, causing walking limitation."), 803 ("It is at least as likely as not that the lumbar condition is the cause of loss of use of the lower extremity functioning causing walking limitations."), 804 ("It is least as likely as not that part of the cause of loss of use of the lower extremities is due to the painful feet."). Although the Board mentioned the March 2010 VA examination, it did not expressly discuss the foregoing statements, which tend to support Mr.xxxxxxx's claim that he is entitled to SMC for loss of use of his lower extremities. The Board's failure to account for this potentially favorable evidence thus renders inadequate its statements of reasons or bases for its decision. The Court therefore concludes that remand is warranted, 11 Vet.App. 369, 374 (1998) (holding that remand is the appropriate remedy "where the Board has incorrectly applied the law, failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its determinations, or where the record is otherwise inadequate"). On remand, Mr. xxxxxx is free to present any additional argument and evidence pertaining to his claim for SMC to the Board in accordance with 12 Vet.App. 369, 372-73 (1999) (per curiam order).v 16 Vet.App. 529, 534 (2002). The Court reminds the Board that "[a] remand is meant to entail a critical examination of the justification for [the Board's] decision," Fletcher v. Derwinski 1 Vet.App. 394, 397 (1991), and must be performed in an expeditious manner in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7112 Upon consideration of the foregoing, the portion of the April 24, 2012, Board decision denying entitlement to SMC for loss of use of the lower extremities is SET ASIDE and the claim is REMANDED for readjudication consistent with this decision. Thank you. Dated: June 12, 2013

Militarynurse: Yes it is possible I receive 100% service connected seizure disorder diagnostic code no.8910 since 1975. And 70% Ser.Connected TBI since 2009 it is noted in my recent medical records that my seizure disorder is secondary to my traumatic brain injury, in the 70's era TBI was not being use just a head injury So i believe it is possible...

I have had a seizure disorder since 1975 because of a head injury I've been 100% service connected for seizures since 1984, I applied for TBI about 5 years ago and recieved 70% SC for TBI within a year. My medical reports over the years state my seizure disorder is secondary to my TBI injury so it would seem to me my TBI should be before 1984 so I requested an earlier effective date for my TBI award...

Babyray: I recieved my static CA 8/31/12 also But on 22th of september I recieved a statment from the Prosthetic center at my RO informing me my claim has been approved and I should expect a payment shortly,, I assume this is for my secound CA but still waiting for the deposit....

C&P examination on 311/2010 Diagnosis: Cervical degenerative disease spondylosis and myelopathy. Medical Opinion: It is at least as likely as not that the cervical condition is the cause of loss of use of the lower extremities, causing walking limitations.The veteran is not able to perform any gainful employment due to the cervical spine condition. Diagnosis: lumbar degenerative disk disease, spondylosis and radiculopathy. Medical Opinion: It is at least as likely as not that the lumbar condition is the cause of loss of use of the lower extremity functioning causing walking limitations. The veteran has not been able to work since 1989.The veteran is still not able to perform gainful employment due to his low back condition I think this opinion would have been in my favor but the regional office ignored or misplaced this report I send a copy of this report to the regional office in Baltimore and asked fo a reveiw but nothing went down except I found out threw IRIS my claim was received by the BVA in september 2011,along with several other claims dated back to 2005 nothing I can do but wait..........