Flyby

Excellent information Berta, thank you very much!

Very good info Berta, thanks again. Reached out again via email contact to D. Brier (attorney for Laskowski) and his firm. Trying to get in contact with Dr. Dondershine and Dr. Goldstein, the IMO from that case. Have reached out to Dr. Bash as well. Still no responses. If I choose to go 1151 route on this, what can I expect in general? Is the outcome similar to FTCA? Think I read somewhere that you felt they were similar. Haven't ruled out FTCA on my own...just trying to weigh my options.

Thanks for the input both Berta and Buck52. Berta-I have not received or filed the Form 95 or submitted to counsel yet. I am going under the premise that my 2yr statute began to run in December 2016 with December 21 of this year being the deadline to file. I have reached out to the Laskowski attorney Daniel Brier with no response thus far, and to several large firms in the US. Ironically, the attorney I am seeing soon didn't feel I had a case a year ago when we talked on the phone. He is local. I reached out to a large TX firm...within minutes the same local attorney reached out to me via email. Guess the firm forwarded him my info when I stated no local attorney would even see me?? The VA is in Georgia...will just leave it there for now. The patient advocate (supervisor) did document what we talked about, including the MD's words. She actually took the time to type it in carefully word-for-word and let me review it. Just to be clear, I know now the drinking, etc. is harmful especially mixed with a drug like Lorazepam. The thing about Lorazepam that should have been made abundantly clear by an APRN or MD prescribing is that it is highly disinhibiting. It will make you do things completely out of character. All of that is contained within the FDA warning. Further, the warning concering PTSD symptoms being compounded, especially with alcohol is very clear. VA seemed to ignore that in my case. Just to reinforce my point I have not drank a drop of alcohol since discontinuing Lorazepam in Feb 2017, I have dropped the thirty pounds, and am not sick all the time. Lorazepam can and sometimes causes respiratory distress among other things. Instead of just continuing to prescribe a controlled substance what about counseling for alcohol use/abuse? That was never offered or referred by VA. Side note, my EEOC is in limbo. I withdrew without prejudice not knowing if I could withstand summary judgement. I have a letter now, gained through my own discovery, from a colleague that EEOC claims to have interviewed that completely dismantles EEOCs so-called investigation. Am working with a National advocacy group for hearing-impaired persons hoping to sway EEOC and how they handle veterans claims of employment discrimination. Thanks again for what you do and have done. Buck52-Thanks for your response. "You had to have a face to face with a VA Qualified medical professional or Private to get these prescribe medications at one time or another after the first initial evaluation." The qualified medical professional that you mention is the APRN, a nurse practicioner with prescriptive authority given to them by the State (of Georgia) in this case and signed-off on by the State medical board, DEA, etc. I saw her face-to-face every six months for nearly seven years. In that time she never mentioned I might end up in a nursing home or dead from a seizure. Only that Lorazepam was beneficial for me and to remain compliant. Her supervisor, the MD I met for the first time in 2016, was signing off blindly on Schedule IV narcotics (Lorazepam a Benzodiazepine) because he had "so many patients." I agree that there has to be a face-to-face initial meeting but there was obviously an extreme lack of communication-accountability between the APRN and MD. The MD is the supervisor and is "responsible for every decision made by the APRN"(respondeat superior and vicarious liability) no matter how many patients they have or how busy. That is a loose quote from VA's and The State of Georgia's own guidelines concerning APRN/MD protocol. "wanted to add this : maybe I am not understanding your situation? or understanding what you are saying here?" I don't follow you here...this wasn't in my post or reply.

Is this FTCA worthy? Thought I was posting in the correct Forum with my original post...know this is in Berta's wheelhouse: I am receiving 100% TDIU (90% SC w/remaining based on IU) since 2014. Saw an APRN from 2010-2016. In that time they (APRN/MD) prescribed Lorazepam at first 2mgs (1mg twice a day). Had already fought VA solo for a decade in getting the diagnosis for SC PTSD and GERD back-dated and had tried a laundry list of prescribed meds but had had no luck. I was asking the APRN repeatedly about dependence on the Lorazepam, side-effects, etc...all documented. Was even told in a C&P by a PhD that the drug is "not addictive." I was told repeatedly the importance of "medication compliance" by the APRN. Despite my life spiraling, all documented, the APRN kept prescribing. I even asked the dosage to be reduced. I never had a face-to-face with the MD as required by APRN/MD protocol in all that time. I had gained thirty pounds, was drinking heavily, was forced to sell a self-started business due to IU, and deaths of significant others, etc...all things that should have likely prompted a sit-down with the prescribing MD. Fastforward to just-prior-to Christmas 2016 I received a letter stating I was being reassigned to a new MD. Within seconds of our meeting the MD had already stated he had not read my chart and then proceeds to just berate me stating "I was an addict...look at you." I sit forward in a chair to hear. He would have known that if he would have simply read my chart. I held my tongue and just let him spew. He then states if I continue taking the drug I will "end up in a nursing home." In the same sentence, while essentially yelling at me, he says if you stop taking it you will "drop dead from a seizure." To say I was stunned would be an understatement. I said nothing. I had been told for the past six years that this medication was a "wonderdrug" for me and I was told by the APRN to remain "compliant" in taking the med. I am not an addict by the way. I was someone that had taken a drug EXACTLY as prescribed for over six years while being assured and reassured by an APRN that it was nothing but beneficial for me. All documented. I was never told this drug was life-threatening. Again, I never abused Lorazepam only taking it as prescribed. I had heard enough from this MD, also the Chief-of-Staff of the clinic; I asked him "if this medication is so dangerous then why have I been prescribed it for so long?" His response still resonates with me. I think at that moment he realized HE was the doctor signing-off on the APRN requests for that length of time...but he didn't stop talking. I knew that he was the MD before we ever met that day. His name was on every bottle filled. He admitted he "likely was the doctor signing-off" and "he had so many patients he just signed-off on the APRN requests." What?! His facial expression was priceless when the reality of what he was telling me hit him; he immediately began to throw the NP/APRN under the bus saying "she had a history of over-prescribing." He was incredibly rude, brazen, and unapologetic in his admisson. He even put in my progress notes from that day that my taking a half of a half of a 1mg Lorazepam as needed was my "attempt to ween myself." This was untrue at the time and I feel was a vain attempt to cover himself somehow. I reported everything that was said to the patient advocate...her response..."you caught him." I have since discontinued the med not without horrible withdrawls and am now having uncontrollable muscle movements with my right hand curling inward with fingers locking rigidly, memory loss and gait/balance issues. I am obviously "unemployable" as well. The MDs attempt to taper me from the medication was questionable as well...he told me to "only take it if I need it" instead of a proper taper. The patient advocate and her supervisor have mentioned the Form 95 and my Rights. During the time I was on the medication I was in Chapter 31/35 Voc Rehab. I experienced just about every form of employment discrimination there is as a first-year teacher.That's a nightmare by itself. Just to put this out there...EEOC is a joke. I disclosed my hearing impairment prior to being hired on a pre-employment checklist, which is an illegal inquiry by the way. When I had a simple disagreement with an Assistant Principal about a collateral duty he placed me outside from Nov-Feb next to a running industrial-sized generator. When I requested to be moved I was ignored. EEOC opined not only was this normal but even allowed the opposing attorney to claim I had "never disclosed nor was disabled" despite having written proof. EEOC even allowed the opposing and one of its own directors to question my military service. I was forced to resign. I hope that hits home for folks on this forum. If EEOC can scoff at my military service and a VA SC disability then what does that say about their REAL view of ADA/ADAAA, veterans, and SC disabilities? I can't get a teaching interview due to retaliation from my former employer; EEOC is aware but refuses to even open mail from me. Again, EEOC apparently does not care about some veterans. I filed in Federal Court pro se when no attorney had the brass to represent me. Instead of VA Voc Rehab advocating for me, which they are required to do by statute, and helping me keep my job for a very specific disability disclosure prior to being hired as a teacher, they (VA) simply deemed me "unemployable." All the while they were prescribing a med that was obviously making my SC disability much worse--obviously hindsight helps here. The two MDs I have seen since 2016 both agree that not only was the dosage excessive, too prolonged, but most importantly that given my pre-existing SC of PTSD the expectation of very specific outcomes should have been expected. See Laskowski v US (Dondershine opinion). According to my own research since the FDA has no clinical studies past several months for Lorazepam much less six plus years...further FDA states very clearly that in certain patients, PTSD symptoms could/will be compounded. I have spoken with several attorneys that claim to handle FTCA cases. So far the majority only are interested in "catastrophic injury" cases. Considering I am faced with possible lifelong issues related to this med and a complete lack of accountability between APRN/MD is this FTCA material? I have read the Laskowski v US case which seems similar despite me not being a criminal. I do have a face-to-face appointment with an attorney in about a week. Please advise.

I know this is in Berta's wheelhouse: I am receiving 100% TDIU (90% SC w/remaining based on IU) since 2014. Saw an APRN from 2010-2016. In that time they (APRN/MD) prescribed Lorazepam at first 2mgs (1mg twice a day). Had already fought VA solo for a decade in getting the diagnosis for SC PTSD and GERD back-dated and had tried a laundry list of prescribed meds but had had no luck. I was asking the APRN repeatedly about dependence on the Lorazepam, side-effects, etc...all documented. Was even told in a C&P by a PhD that the drug is "not addictive." I was told repeatedly the importance of "medication compliance" by the APRN. Despite my life spiraling, all documented, the APRN kept prescribing. I even asked the dosage to be reduced. I never had a face-to-face with the MD as required by APRN/MD protocol in all that time. I had gained thirty pounds, was drinking heavily, was forced to sell a self-started business due to IU, and deaths of significant others, etc...all things that should have likely prompted a sit-down with the prescribing MD. Fastforward to just-prior-to Christmas 2016 I received a letter stating I was being reassigned to a new MD. Within seconds of our meeting the MD had already stated he had not read my chart and then proceeds to just berate me stating "I was an addict...look at you." I sit forward in a chair to hear. He would have known that if he would have simply read my chart. I held my tongue and just let him spew. He then states if I continue taking the drug I will "end up in a nursing home." In the same sentence, while essentially yelling at me, he says if you stop taking it you will "drop dead from a seizure." To say I was stunned would be an understatement. I said nothing. I had been told for the past six years that this medication was a "wonderdrug" for me and I was told by the APRN to remain "compliant" in taking the med. I am not an addict by the way. I was someone that had taken a drug EXACTLY as prescribed for over six years while being assured and reassured by an APRN that it was nothing but beneficial for me. All documented. I was never told this drug was life-threatening. Again, I never abused Lorazepam only taking it as prescribed. I had heard enough from this MD, also the Chief-of-Staff of the clinic; I asked him "if this medication is so dangerous then why have I been prescribed it for so long?" His response still resonates with me. I think at that moment he realized HE was the doctor signing-off on the APRN requests for that length of time...but he didn't stop talking. I knew that he was the MD before we ever met that day. His name was on every bottle filled. He admitted he "likely was the doctor signing-off" and "he had so many patients he just signed-off on the APRN requests." What?! His facial expression was priceless when the reality of what he was telling me hit him; he immediately began to throw the NP/APRN under the bus saying "she had a history of over-prescribing." He was incredibly rude, brazen, and unapologetic in his admisson. He even put in my progress notes from that day that my taking a half of a half of a 1mg Lorazepam as needed was my "attempt to ween myself." This was untrue at the time and I feel was a vain attempt to cover himself somehow. I reported everything that was said to the patient advocate...her response..."you caught him." I have since discontinued the med not without horrible withdrawls and am now having uncontrollable muscle movements with my right hand curling inward with fingers locking rigidly, memory loss and gait/balance issues. I am obviously "unemployable" as well. The MDs attempt to taper me from the medication was questionable as well...he told me to "only take it if I need it" instead of a proper taper. The patient advocate and her supervisor have mentioned the Form 95 and my Rights. During the time I was on the medication I was in Chapter 31/35 Voc Rehab. I experienced just about every form of employment discrimination there is as a first-year teacher.That's a nightmare by itself. Just to put this out there...EEOC is a joke. I disclosed my hearing impairment prior to being hired on a pre-employment checklist, which is an illegal inquiry by the way. When I had a simple disagreement with an Assistant Principal about a collateral duty he placed me outside from Nov-Feb next to a running industrial-sized generator. When I requested to be moved I was ignored. EEOC opined not only was this normal but even allowed the opposing attorney to claim I had "never disclosed nor was disabled" despite having written proof. EEOC even allowed the opposing and one of its own directors to question my military service. I was forced to resign. I hope that hits home for folks on this forum. If EEOC can scoff at my military service and a VA SC disability then what does that say about their REAL view of ADA/ADAAA, veterans, and SC disabilities? I can't get a teaching interview due to retaliation from my former employer; EEOC is aware but refuses to even open mail from me. Again, EEOC apparently does not care about some veterans. I filed in Federal Court pro se when no attorney had the brass to represent me. Instead of VA Voc Rehab advocating for me, which they are required to do by statute, and helping me keep my job for a very specific disability disclosure prior to being hired as a teacher, they (VA) simply deemed me "unemployable." All the while they were prescribing a med that was obviously making my SC disability much worse--obviously hindsight helps here. The two MDs I have seen since 2016 both agree that not only was the dosage excessive, too prolonged, but most importantly that given my pre-existing SC of PTSD the expectation of very specific outcomes should have been expected. See Laskowski v US (Dondershine opinion). According to my own research since the FDA has no clinical studies past several months for Lorazepam much less six plus years...further FDA states very clearly that in certain patients, PTSD symptoms could/will be compounded. I have spoken with several attorneys that claim to handle FTCA cases. So far the majority only are interested in "catastrophic injury" cases. Considering I am faced with possible lifelong issues related to this med and a complete lack of accountability between APRN/MD is this FTCA material? I have read the Laskowski v US case which seems similar despite me not being a criminal. I do have a face-to-face appointment with an attorney in about a week. Any suggestions/thoughts would be helpful in pursuing my case. Thanks, FLYBY-USMC SAR

Meghp0405-good info..Thanks. I feel the criteria for at least 50% for PTSD was there at the initial C&P that awarded the 30% and luckily I have a mountain of C-file info and private doc records to support it. That was my rationale for the NOD back in in 2010. Unfortunately my condition(s) have deteriorated to the point now where I can't work. I was a teacher. Truthfully, I probably couldn't back then but was too stubborn to know any better. Thanks again.

The first post I asked Berta to reply...it had very specific info she requested. The second post, yes same topic was after being told today by a Senator's liason I have nothing more to appeal. I disagree with that whole-heartedly. So, I re-wrote my post to be more concise-Thank you Carlie!

*oops-September 12, 2012 effective date.

I was awarded 30% for PTSD in 2009 that was backdated to 2001...one day following honorable discharge from the Marine Corps. I submitted an NOD for the 30% for PTSD and 10% GERD being too low, timely, in 2010. VA has just awarded increases for GERD (30%) and PTSD (70%) and granted IU but used the C&P exam date of Sep 12, 2013 as my effective date. Is this effective date correct on an open-continuous claim? The IU was inferred if that makes a difference. I feel VA only really addressed the IU which is great in the Rating Decision by just simply awarding 70%, however; the backpay issue is a big deal from a 2012 to back possibly much further. Just want to make sure VA got it right before my deadline of March 8 2013 arrives to respond. Thanks!

My question is this: Since my Original Claim for PTSD and GERD have been continuously open, is my effective date VA has assigned correct? With the jump from 30% to 70% for PTSD and the increase from 10% to 30% for GERD it seems I have gotten the short-end with my effective date only being back to Sep 2012. How about the three + years it took VA to get to my NOD...Any input would be great.

This is quoted directly from the SOC dated Jan 8, 2013: DECISION-"Evaluation of post traumatic stress (PTSD) with panic disorder, currently evaluated as 30 percent disabling, is increased to 70 percent disabling.". 2) "Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which is currently 10 percent disabling, is increased to 30 percent disabling." Both were given an effective date of September 5, 2012. That was the day I had QTC appointments for both even though these are both open/continuous from December 8, 2001. I was prepared to file an NOD because of the effective dates. January 14, 2013-"We made a decision on your notice of disagreement received on September 16, 2010." Rating Decision: 1) Evaluation of PTSD with panic disorder currently at 30 percent--The evaluation of PTSD with panic disorder is increased to 70 percent disabling effective September 5, 2012, the date VA showed symptoms warranted an increased evaluation. THIS IS A PARTIAL GRANT OF THE ISSUE OF INCREASED EVALUATION THAT IS ON APPEAL." The GERD explanation reads the same with the same "partial" caveat at the end. January 24, 2010-Senator's Inquiry Response from VA: "Mr.___filed a claim for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder on March 11, 2009. We made a decision Mr._____claim on August 20, 2010, of which we notified him on August 23, 2010. We received the Notice of Disagreement on September 16, 2010. We made a decision on Mr.____NOD on January 8, 2013. Since the benefit on appeal remains denied, a Statement of the case was issued. If Mr._____would like to continue his appeal to the BVA he must submit his substantive appeal before his appellate rights expire for this decisiin on March 8, 2013." The PARTIAL awards are never identified in the rating decision and the Senator's response letter claims there was a denial if some sort that triggered the SOC. There is no DENIAL language anywhere that I have read. Hope this helps...I can't scan from my so-called smartphone. Thanks for the input and continued help.

In 2009 I was awarded SC for PTSD (insomnia, nervous condition, and depression) at 30% that was awarded back to one-day prior to my EAS of Dec 8 2001 from the Marine Corps. Through this eight year span I was the person that tracked down flight crew pilots and rescue swimmers to validate my claims. I was awarded 30%, which I felt was low. I submitted a timely NOD for an increase to a minumum of 50% based on VA's own published criteria. That NOD from 2010 was just addressed less than two weeks ago. I have been awarded 70% PTSD and 30% GERD, both original claims continuously open since 2001. Was also awarded TDIU. The effective dates of these awards only went back to Sept 2012, the time when my last QTC for both PTSD and GERD. Am I missing something here? My VSO feels that because TDIU has "muddied" the water, that my PTSD/GERD NOD claims are not being addressed. In my award letter it states that both the PTSD award and GERD award are both only "partial" awards. What does this mean? Berta please help. I have time left to appeal or submit an NOD but have no clue what to submit. VA claims there is a denial somewhere which came in a letter via my Senator's office, therefore the SOC was sent out. Thank you!