Jump to content

lotzaspotz

Subscription Holder
  • Content count

    444
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

lotzaspotz last won the day on September 13 2016

lotzaspotz had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

314 Excellent

1 Follower

About lotzaspotz

  • Rank
    E-7 Chief Petty Officer

Profile Information

  • Location
    Northwest Louisiana

Previous Fields

  • Branch of Service
    Husband is retired USAF Air Traffic Controller

Recent Profile Visitors

1,343 profile views
  1. Perfect example of "don't give up and don't die!" We're at 24 years and pending in our house. So glad you finally received your rating! Now, can we draw on your experience to help others just starting out?
  2. Is there a deadline post separation that limits a veteran from filing for service connection for a hysterectomy?
  3. I don't know, but I figured if that was information the VA needed to make a rating decision, they would have included it on the DBQ for GERD. If it's not there for the non-VA doctor to answer, it wouldn't be there for the C&P examiner to answer, either. Only, there was no C&P exam offered, despite the DBQ's by treating MD's and evidence of prescriptions taken to treat SC conditions over the course of several years.
  4. I'll look for those, too. Thanks Buck. The DBQ said GERD on it. Can't figure that out. And no rating exam, either. Looks like another learning experience for me.
  5. They did opine on what caused GERD. They addressed the specific medications he takes for service connected disabilities and the length of time he's taken them. I just wanted to know where on that form does it ask for a "baseline" level of GERD because I can't find it. Evidently, neither could the MD's. I think they would have addressed that specific question if they could see where it had been asked.
  6. Good morning, all. Can someone tell me where the DBQ for GERD asks about a baseline level of GERD? My husband's treating private physicians, one a GP and the other a gastrointestinal Board certified specialist, both completed DBQ's. The claim was denied solely because they both did not describe a baseline level of GERD, but I don't see that question on the form. That appears to be the only reason it was denied. The VA had release of information letters for the doctors, but we provided copies of all the records ourselves. I don't know why, if that one isolated piece of information was missing, the VA didn't let the doctors or my husband know (we could have addressed that prior to a denial). Plus, there was no C& P exam provided. We thought this might have been an oversight, but it wasn't, the denial without a rating exam was repeated by the DRO. The claim regarded certain medications taken for service connected conditions for many years that have a clinical connection to causing GERD, as the doctors reported.
  7. Trust your gut instinct, not what you're necessarily hearing from your previously MIA VSO. This matter won't be resolved in the short term, so do you trust him enough to not continue to worry about your status in the interim? Past performance is a good indicator of what to expect in the future. Anyway, if you are still open to the attorney option, I highly recommend Doug Rosinski. He's argued in person before the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, speaks nationally before veterans law attorney groups, and you can google him for more background. If you want to hear him argue, he's on the audio at the CAVC on the Larry Robinson case heard on July 15, 2016. He's also a veteran. http://www.djrosinski.com/
  8. Bronco, I have a question on the life insurance. My husband has held this insurance about eight years or so. We were never told about it prior to that (even though he would have qualified for it) and when he won an appeal on an earlier effective date, we applied for it. He has now been 100% schedular for 20 years, but that wasn't awarded in real time. We clawed back through Appeals of either ratings or effective dates a little bit at a time, so each time, we gained a little more retro for him. So, does the 20 year period that must pass before you can cash out the face value of the policy start from the date the veteran is rated 100%, or does it start when the policy is actually issued? The veteran doesn't pay premiums, so the VA isn't losing any money in the deal either way, I would think. Thanks!
  9. I have a question, if anyone here can assist. Have any of you been awarded a compensable rating (at least 20%) for a ventral (abdominal) hernia, even though you were never formally prescribed a belt/truss? The reason I'm asking is the VA is interpreting DC 7339 (ventral hernia) at the 20% disability level as requiring a prescription for a belt. However, the rating criteria doesn't state that a prescribed belt is required - what it does say is that the need for a belt is "indicated." What is the legal definition of "indicated?" Usually, when the VA requires something of this nature, it clearly says so. Also, I found a Board appeal where the veteran was awarded 20%, but clearly stated during a Board hearing that he didn't wear a belt. His appeal for an increase to 40% was denied, but the Board let him keep his 20%. This rating hadn't reached the 20 year mark, either. Thanks for any additional information you may be able to give.
  10. If the goal is to reach a 100% schedular rating from a current 90% rating, you'd actually need another 50% to get you to 95% (not 10%), which would then be rounded up to 100% schedular (not TDIU). Yes, a $10,000 invoice payable up front is a very steep hurdle to clear.
  11. Yes, that was my initial reaction. Sometimes, the veteran needs to ask for it instead of waiting for the VA to make the first move. I don't know if the original poster actually asked for it or not. If not, try it.
  12. Yes, I did so, too. Worked like a charm. The writ was denied as moot, after the writ dislodged the appeal out of the AMC, which was the whole point of filing it.
  13. Newnan has been closed down. http://www.gardberglawfirm.com/2016/06/va-closes-newnan-georgia-evidence-intake-center.shtml
  14. Yeah, the original determination was a denial. I'm not a big believer in DRO reviews, so my experience with them is limited. The denial letter was useless as far as trying to figure out reasons and bases, it just made declarative statements without explaining any reasoning behind them.
×