I apologize for the confusion. They didn't deny the re-open. They denied the new sleep apnea and FSAD secondary to MST/PTSD. I was diagnosed with PTSD back in 2009 by the VA docs before I filed the disability claim for PTSD due to MST. When I filed the claim in 2009 for the PTSD/MST, they denied that one. The new decision last week granted PTSD/MST at 70% but gave me a long sermon about how since the MST was not verified they had to use markers to decide my case. It is very negative and demeaning almost. They said the doctor confirmed that the PTSD was related to MST so they conceded. You will see what I am talking about. They never stop re-victimizing MST victims it seems like.
Also, in 2009 when they denied the PTSD, they granted Depression at 50%, so they have combined the PTSD/MST with MDD into one as I expected. I know they consider MDD or PTSD one mental health disorder, but that does not help you heal when they misdiagnose or deny what is really wrong with you or what really caused all of the madness we experience due to PTSD.
I am attaching a copy of the recent decision from last week and the IMO from Dr. Ellis in April 2019. Pay attention to the careful language they use about Dr. Ellis. They never refer to it as an Independent Medical Opinion. They keep referring to it as a statement by Dr. Ellis attempting to link. I think that is problematic in and of itself. They deferred the high blood pressure, GERD, IBS and migraines decisions maybe because I had in service treatment for those and a current diagnoses that I am on medication for those.
They denied the new sleep apnea and FSAD claims because they said there was nothing in my in service records regarding those or I was never treated for either one. My ex-husband submitted a buddy statement regarding episodes in my sleep while we were on active duty and they didn't mention reviewing that at all. All they mention is the C&P and in service records that they say were more persuasive. I thought his direct eye witness account had to be considered as well. He also wrote about the FSAD contributing to the end of our marriage because of my intimacy issues that were unexplainable at the time.
Trying to figure out if I should go the supplemental claims route with a new medical opinion and bring up they didn't consider his lay statement. Your thoughts on that one? Also he corroborated the FSAD. I will cut and paste his statement in another post rather than attaching it. I am attaching a copy of Dr. Ellis' IMO and the decision for review and assistance.
Standing by
Dr. Ellis redacted report-OSA excerpt.pdf
VA Decision July 17, 2019 redacted.pdf