ChrisHW

My "attorney" is with my VSO.... so free. shes amazing but helps many many more people than those in the private sector. I think she cares more, just busier. She "mostly" handles the big items, BVA appeals, NODs... I can't say enough good about her... but she said that the RO will prioritize my case by docket date and the RO said nope, it goes into the 3 year backlog and when I ask for help the attorney keeps telling me that mine will be prioritized. kinda catch-22 Thanks! wow- hopefully they will support your case and finally get it finished! Sorry, all the paperwork in front of me has the "old 2018 docket number" before the BVA advanced my case by changing to the 2011 docket number. But my question is kinda unrelated- simply is there a way to get the RO to use the docket number or, old date of remand, or date of claim to prioritize schedule rather than the date of the newest remand. 39 more months just is very frustrating, especially when my lawyer/BVA told me that the RO will schedule mine by 2008/2011/2014 date rather than the 2019 date they are using (shorten the wait to 8 months.) Thanks! I hope you can laugh at that now... i'd guess that less than 10% of what I've submitted made it in the file between 2008-2013. Heck, i submitted a change of address 4-5 times. After they didn't change it, Senator Warner submitted it 4-5 times for me... and they still scheduled my original BVA at my old address.. a couple states away!

No, seriously, I received a complete copy of my c-file. There are hundreds of pages that were not scanned in/are missing. edit- also for instance my surgeon sent a 45 page surgery report. including diagnosis tests, etc. Only the first 3 pages are in my C-file. The rest of the pages never got scanned. For instance, even my intend to file and their reply is missing! luckily I kept a copy so once I get approved I will have another 6 months of award. The mortgage foreclosure and hardship letters are missing. The change of address form is missing. Many of the medical records... I begun sending everything by certified and that didn't work, i'd have a signature but not added. I then started having my senator send everything. My BVA hearing was scheduled in a different state even after I sent in a change of address, faxed it, certified mailed it and had the senator mail it. If it wasn't that the senator's office wrote a letter saying that they sent it i'd have been screwed. The Va said they never got a change of address after my house was forclosed on. The senator wrote a nice but nasty letter stating they sent it themselves three times and was never scanned. so, don't believe for a single moment that that the VA keeps track of paperwork. That said, everything i've sent since like 2017 (or maybe 2015) has shown up. This problem might just be how things were before they started trying to improve part of their processes???

Yes, President and VASec a couple times. totally ignored, well, they entered in the notes they spoke to me but never contacted me. I was told "out of school" by the Regional Office that this is why some of the documents went missing and to never do this again, makes them look bad so they make me suffer. Lawyer says that the Regional Office will put me in front of the line due to the early docket date. She says that's what they are "supposed" to do. But... can't contact or do anything They know the exact order the cases will be considered. I'm at the end of the list (and last heard they are backlogged 30 months) Their estimate online was April, since then is in three weeks. This changes every couple weeks so it always is in about three weeks. thx! 1. Yes. C&P says unable to work due to the awarded disability. BVA remand quotes notes from my private docs that the VA C&P examiner was supposed to address. These notes were not given to the examiner (of course..). 2. Yes, the SSDI is for the same disability. The VA doc who examined my medical notes in 2016 (not in person) said that CSF leaks, neurogenic bladder etc. are not due to a spinal cord injury while the SSA award said they are symptoms. The VA examiner also said that headaches/depression/mental issues are unrelated to TBI, SCI... and so on. The C&P examiner this spring says all symptoms are a direct result of the SCI. (of course my private docs all say same thing as C&P doc). There is no doubt of a higher rating based upon medical evidence. its 20 docs opinions vs 1 (of course I thought the same thing when it was 19 vs 1 due to the benefit of doubt rule...). The regional office actually had to send my file out to three VA neurologists for medical review to get one who say i wasn't disabled (actually the 3rd doc said that they could not link the symptoms with 100% certainty, didn't say that they were not symptoms but "just as likely as not"). 3. Yes, the last remand in 2013 ordered the regional office to consider the SSDI case. The 0% award said that the symptoms are not due to the disability. Mistakenly, the award actually says that the symptoms are due to the disability, the RVSR probably accidentally left in one of the second examiner's quotes in the award/SSOC that says due to the spinal cord injury. Of course, the next paragraph it quotes the second doc who says they are not :). The BVA ALJ actually points out in the remand that one of their own medical examiners said it was disabling in the SSOC/Award. I think the first time the RVSR initially was going to give an award greater than 0%. In sept 2016 it went to pending decision approval, then back to gathering of evidence and the third VA medical examination of my file is dated Oct 2016. It has been alluded to that this was the revenge for filing a VaSec complaint. 4. Anyways, I don't know about the staged rating, the 0% award says the disability is decades old and it states the symptoms have been going on for that long. The denial for a higher rating was due to the VA medical examiner who said that the SCI symptoms where not symptoms of the SCI. I also had spinal cord surgeries over a decade ago that list the symptoms even back then. 5. I can't find it 11-12 something. I apologize for going off topic and venting. I guess the consensus is that even with a 11-12 docket date that the regional office can prioritize based upon when they received it rather than any other order. The BVA ALJ and my attorney are wrong that it should be dated by the original remand. Thank you! Chris

Thank! Yes, the BVA used the old docket number. My case was heard in days once they "got" it from the Regional Office. It was remanded again to the regional office where it is sitting in que with a "new" date of claim of January 2019. Thanks!!! 1. My effective date is 2006. In the 0% rating. I am waiting to appeal this- they used claim date vs intent to file and I have VA letter. I didn't want to slow this appeal trying to add the effective date until the remand rating is done. 2. My BVA decision was same day. literally same day. Remanded again for C&P (regional office ignored original remand for C&P). Wait for review was a couple days. The BVA number 800-923-8387 still works, the (202) is disconnected. The claim coach is the VA supervisor over the DROs. I agree she doesn't know ha ha ha My case is at the Regional Office. The lawyer and judge said that it should have the same "claim date" of the original BVA remand (2013) for prioritization but when the Regional Office got the second BVA remand claim they assigned a new claim date (2019). The BVA remanded for C&P in 2013, I was approved for 0% but never got the C&P. So it went back to the BVA who used the original docket date and remanded again for a C&P. Sorry for being confusing. I'm confused! In a nutshell, the attorney and BVA judge said that the date of claim for regional office prioritization should be based upon the original remand, not this new remand to do what the original remand ordered. The Claims Supervisor at the Regional Office says no, I get a new date and so instead of being in the "front of the line" i'm last and have a expected 30 month wait. Thanks!

Hi! long time lurker... past year 12 and VA still dragging their feet. Does anyone know any way to get the RO to schedule me by the earlier date? Is the BVA Judge and my attorney correct that the RO should consider docket date? Original date of claim 2007, current BVA docket date 2012 (LMAO, my BVA wait was hours, was first in line). Awarded 0% in 2017 dated back to '06 (receiving SSDI since 2007). Anyways, remanded for same reason as 2014 remand, C&P exam (RO ignored last remand orders). C&P says unable to work due to disability. Last I heard there is a 30 month backlog from date the RO received the remand from BVA (Jan 2019). My VSO/Atty said that the RO is supposed to consider mine out of order due to the early docket date. The Claims Coach said, nope, its the new date of claim assigned when we receive it from BVA. My interpretation is that since the BVA decides by docket date, that the remand date usually corresponds to the docket date. In my case mine was decided out of order so the lawyer and judge said that the RO is supposed to consider the docket date while scheduling prioritization. I can get a email to the claims coach if I can find justification for a earlier date of claim. Any suggestions? Thanks!!!