Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

VA Disability Claims Articles

Ask Your VA Claims Question | Current Forum Posts Search | Rules | View All Forums
VA Disability Articles | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users

Vync

Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder
  • Posts

    6,169
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    159

Everything posted by Vync

  1. I have not checked it for a bit, but as of this morning no change from the "waiting to be assigned to a judge" status. It is promising to learn that your appeal, which is about 3 months older than mine, actually did get assigned to a judge. Did you have a hearing already or did you waive that option?
  2. Welcome to Hadit! This information might be helpful, but this only mentions apportionment to spouse, children, or dependent parents based upon need, however siblings are not mentioned. Call 1-800-8727-1000 or an accredited VSO to learn more. I hope this helps! https://www.benefits.va.gov/persona/veteran-incarcerated.asp This is a link to M21-1 which is the VA's internal processes. It goes much deeper into it. https://www.knowva.ebenefits.va.gov/system/templates/selfservice/va_ssnew/help/customer/locale/en-US/portal/554400000001018/content/554400000176632/M21-1-Part-VII-Subpart-iii-Chapter-1-Section-A-Apportionment-Process
  3. I do not know if this is rolled out everywhere, but wanted to share my experience. I had a pre-scheduled appointment at my VAMC. Of course, I was bombarded by letters and text messages reminding me about the appointment. However, when I was driving to the hospital, I received a different text asking me to check in remotely. Once I got on the premises, I used the feature to check in. It was pretty simple. What surprised me was it asked if I wanted to file a travel claim for this specific appointment. I decided to give it a shot. It appears to have worked. I checked the travel web site and found the claim showing as "claim submitted". I kind of doubt this would work for community care, but have not tried it yet.
  4. @Lemuel No worries. Each party has their own set of pros and cons.
  5. Right now, everything is pretty much backed up unless you have a reason to expedite processing. The front of the line is now generally for hardship, terminally ill, over 75, legacy, and PACT Act (which opened the doors to a ton of new claims). The VA keeps hiring, but they have always seemed to be perpetually understaffed.
  6. I understand what you mean. I did not want to stride into the political realms per the site policy (unless it has recently changed). I believe everyone is entitled to their opinion. I remember when Reagan gave active duty the largest pay raise in decades. Also remember the Graham-Ruddman and Clinton consolidation/draw-downs. Kind of sad to see Army bases where I grew up getting turned over to host countries simply to be demolished. But that is another story (to quote Paul Harvey).
  7. @Lemuel I submitted a couple late last month via the online system. I would have had a third submitted, but the system would freeze and I had to call they helpdesk. They are being processed at my local VAMC. They approved one and are still working on the other (which makes no sense). Per the original post's topic: I also submitted a few more this morning. One of them was for imaging tests and the other was for an ER visit. In both cases, my primary care either had me scheduled solely for that visit as an appt or asked be specifically to go to the ER and get more imaging done after hours. For those two, I chose round trip based reimbursement. It's stupid that someone snuck in one-way payments...
  8. @mayertucker Like the others who have responded, I strongly first finding a reputable lawyer like NOVA or others. The SF-95 seems like a simple form, but knowing what you need to put in every field is a bit. I filed an FTCA on my own and won a settlement. Despite almost dying, it took about two years to complete (during COVID). Look up @Berta and FTCA or 1151 here. She is no longer on Hadit though, but had filed a number of them. Keep in mind that FTCA wins or settlements means they pay you money, but 1151 means service connection just like any of your other service connected disabilities. In some cases, an "offset" might apply, but you'll have to research that on your own. 1151's can be filed at any time. They said my case was presented to three VA doctors for review, but only one was against my claim. If offered a settlement, you can present and justify a counter offer. When the settlement is accepted, you have to sign a release not to hold the VA legally liable for the injury. However, they would not provide copies of the VA doctor's findings or how the settlement was calculated. My care providers over a 5 year period prior to the injury were doctors, student doctors, contractors, and lesser staff like nurses, nurse practitioners, and physicians assistants. Some were direct VA employees while others were not.
  9. @Atlcocky How did you end up getting the corrected EED? I have a similar situation where several initial issues were filed in 1995 and ultimately denied in 2000. About 10 years later I filed again and got them SC, but the VA did not assign an EED back to 1995.
  10. @jamescripps2 I think that amount is just a bit off... Per https://www.va.gov/disability/survivor-dic-rates, the 2024 base DIC rate is $1624.75. @LESASSIER The video provided by @jamescripps2 is really helpful. There are other calculations that can factor in depending on your circumstances at https://www.va.gov/disability/survivor-dic-rates. Keep in mind I do not know much about DIC, but hope the information is helpful.
  11. As will I. Personally, I hope everyone's appeals get handled tomorrow, thoroughly, and accurately. I realize that is wishful thinking though...
  12. @shrekthetank1, @pacmanx1, and @rentalguy1, thank you for your updates! It seems to be the same thing which I dealt with back in the 90s. Hasty analysis and inability to follow the laws/regs...
  13. Just curious where everyone else is sitting with their BVA appeals. This month, my BVA AMA appeal turns 3 years old. It was an appeal of a CUE denial I submitted in 2019. The BVA received my appeal in January 2021 and the video hearing happened in December 2022. VA.gov still says it is waiting to be assigned to a judge to make a decision. I realize there are a ton appeals ahead of me as I am not terminally ill, not over 75 years old, not having a financial hardship, not having a legacy appeal, and not a PACT Act/Toxic Exposure appeal. Not only did I receive one copy of this email today from the VA, but they were nice enough to send me a second copy of it! Bonus!
  14. @Dustoff1970 Yep. The old worksheets did offer greater flexibility to the examiners because they could use as much or little space as needed. They did have template files which they used to fill them out so if they needed more lines to answer questions, they were not constrained. But that second screenshot I posted, it's like either you have painful motion or you don't. Of course, the examiner took lots of handwritten notes which contained more favorable and easier to understand comments than made it into the report. The newer DBQs do have checkboxes to make things easier, but if I were to take the heart exam to a civilian doc, they would be a bit lost. It is almost like the VA made them so "busy" as to require a special training course just to understand how fill them out.
  15. @rentalguy1 That guide from 2002 does look familiar. Back then before they used DBQs, the VA used to use "C&P examination worksheets" which told the examiner what to check and then they would document the findings separately. Here is an actual redacted copy of the dental exam worksheet that was in effect around late 1997: The examiners would type up their findings using letters and numbers which contained the findings for each question. At the time, the VARO staff had a copy of that guide and could look up what was being asked so they could compare it against the laws, regs, and rating criteria. However, after filing a CUE on one of my exams from the late 90s, the VA denied and said they did not know what questions were being asked for each letter/number. Apparently, they were not able to locate the guide you posted. It's almost as bad as digging through old copies of the Federal Register to see how laws/regs read at certain points in time, except I could never locate this clinicians guide (thanks for linking to it). With the advent of the modern DBQs, that changed a lot of things. I don't know which or any sections of the old clinicians guide may still be relevant. In general, based on my experience, the VARO's probably do not know either!
  16. The rating criteria for asthma is under 38 CFR 4.97: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/4.97 Taking the PACT Act approach, as long as you meet those qualifications and have a current asthma diagnosis, you should likely get SC presumptively for asthma. As far as ratings go, I made the 30% criteria bold for emphasis. The presence of the word "or" means you can qualify for 30% if you meet any of those criteria, not all or multiple. Hypothetically, use of inhaled steroids alone would equate to a 30% rating. Be sure to read the higher percentage criteria for 60% or 100%. Your PFT results could qualify you for either of those. Again, keep an eye on the presence of the word "or" for other possible ways to get a higher rating. Regarding steroids, the term "systemic" means administered by swallowing, injecting, or via IV. For the "intermittent (at least three per year) courses of systemic (oral or parenteral) corticosteroids", if you get to that point the VA may grant the higher rating, but only as a temporary rating to be reviewed later because they expect you to improve. Good luck!
  17. @Gone Fishing Yep, no age limit. I am helping a 76 year-old Vietnam vet and he filed for AO-related issues.
  18. @broncovet Thank you very much for the information. I can honestly say I fell your pain on this with the way the VA has interpreted their own regs on my claims over the years. I did more digging and came across this topic. Within, No Result (member name shown there as "Former Member") pointed out some very interesting details (see below link). Quoting No Result: Additional quote from further in the topic: Have you ever looked into Turco, Akles, and Buie to see how it might apply for your situation? I'll have to take the time to digest it to see how it might apply. I bet they have interpretation guidance buried somewhere deep in M21-1... That second quote is quite surprising that the effective date would be when first documented.
  19. Hello everyone, I am helping a retired Army vet with conceded AO SC exposure and moderate dementia and other issues (pending SC) look into SMC-L. I looked into § 3.350 and these two criteria (in bold) stand out. Would any of the following potentially qualify him for SMC-L under the above criteria? Can no longer work because he forgot how to drive back and forth from work to home. Forgets to take his medicine or request refills. Sometimes forgets he took his medicine and takes more (took three months of meds in one month). Unable to budget how to pay bills. His wife has to do a house safety/security check before bed because he tends to leave the front door wide open or unlocked before going to bed. Requires assistance to get to the grocery store, buy groceries, and even buy what he is supposed to buy. Cannot shop unattended. Sometimes tries to or gets into the wrong vehicle when leaving stores, forgetting which car was his. Requires assistance to prepare food because he would under or overcook food, including poultry. Eats leftovers from the fridge which have gone bad. Often forgets to turn off the stove and nearly started fire. Mows the lawn during summer wearing inappropriate clothing like a long sleeve sweater or a coat. Has to be reminded to bathe and perform hygiene. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated! -V
  20. @Ken Dillon Check this out for details about it: https://www.va.gov/life-insurance/totally-disabled-or-terminally-ill/#waiver-of-premiums-for-policyh
  21. @broncovet Before the new VA life system went live, the VA attorney who I spoke with said they are self-insured, but I honestly don't know nor do I actually believe that. They do have a dedicated call center in the Northeast. I did learn that the insurance division appears to follow its own set of rules. They had no idea about how to handle a CUE. They pretty much said that the rules in M21-1 did not apply because they have their own procedure manual (M26 or something else, can't verify now). When I called the VA insurance hotline, they often went by what was in the pamphlet and could not answer specific questions. This is where I learned how they supposedly redefined totally disabled for insurance purposes. Basically, screw what the rest of the VA refers to as totally disabled and insert their own policy-level definition which they believe takes precedence over what is in 38 CFR which are actual regs. Of course, I found a number of cases where vets and widows were granted the insurance waiver even though they were deemed employer. Did not find a single case in favor of the VA on the merits, only situations where they did not file in a timely manner and other unrelated denials.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use