Jump to content
  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'mst'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • My Swan Song: Tbird - Founder HadIt.com
    • Stories from my life
  • General VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims Forums
    • VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims Research Forum
    • VA Disability and Benefits Claims
    • VA Caregiver Benefits - Eligibility to be expanded to all era's Oct 2022
    • Appealing Your Veterans Compensation Disability Claims NOD, DRO, BVA, USCAVC
    • Specialized Claims
    • VA Claims Read First Pinned Topics
    • DIC
    • Denial Letters
    • Entitlement - Veterans Compensation Benefits Claims
    • Veterans Compensation & Pension Exams
    • PTSD Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Claims
    • Success Stories
    • TDIU Unemployability Claims
    • E-Benefits Questions
    • Eligibility - Veterans Compensation Benefit Claims
    • SMC Special Monthly Compensation
    • CUE Clear and Unmistakable Error
    • Medication – Prescription Drugs-Health Issues
    • Agent Orange
    • TBI Traumatic Brain Injury
    • MST - Military Sexual Trauma
    • Social Security Disability Questions
    • Vocational Rehabilitation
    • Federal Register Announcements
    • Appeals Modernization Act AMA
    • RAMP Rapid Appeals Modernization Program
    • CHAMPVA
    • OEF/OIF Veterans
    • IMO Independent Medical Opinion
    • Veterans Benefits State & Federal
    • VA Medical Centers Navigating through it
    • VA Training & Fast letters, Directives, Regulations, Other Guidance Documents
    • MEB/PEB Physical OR Medical Evaluation Forum
    • VA Regional Offices
    • Extras
    • 38 CFR
  • VA Claims References
  • Social Chat
    • Social Chat
    • Ask The Geeks
    • Fallen Comrades

Calendars

There are no results to display.

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


GooglePlus


Military Rank


Location


Interests


Service Connected Disability


Branch of Service


Residence


Hobby

  1. Has anyone filed a lawsuit against the VA per FTCA (federal torts claim act) due to their negligence in processing your MST claim? The ACLU reported that the VA is 16 - 29% more likely to reject a claim of MST vs combat PTSD. The mishandling of my claim for disability has made my condition worse and I want to take action.
  2. Respectfully submit a “Success Story” (prior HADIT account, I am “L” posting in MST/PTSD forum) If you qualify it in terms of getting TDIU. I utilized the forum to keep me informed of updates and criteria- Thanks Y'all! My MST is still haunting me in the form of the inmates’ threats if released. I was first underrated – 2010 / 50% even though I had all the Crime Scene reports and photos, police reports and documentation and VA diagnosis. I missed 13 yrs. of payments since I was discharged out without a service rating, retirement mailed to house – no out processing. I applied to work at the VA and that is when I went through orientation, I discovered help and my eligibility. (God’s timing is not always Man’s timing) I have missed a “good /proper effective date” due to MY errors of doing my own rating work- SSDI awarded on FIRST request 2013, based on PTSD and work history 43 years. But VA paid from claim file date –not disability date of SSDI- I saw the error months later too mentally fatigue to refile ($30,000) plus the last 13 years it took for me to file. (Not eligible since I missed that deadline from d/c date). I redid my claim by reading the CFR and matching it against criteria for rating and paid for an IMO just in case. The DRO process worked for me. Since I laid out the info in a manner to show, how could I have known what impact the Trauma had on me at the time until I therapeutically processed it? I did get the TDIU 100% P&T – and a rater called me personally stating from HOUSTON RO after a requested DRO. “I have not seen an MST claim so thoroughly documented or so brutal” – “I just had to call you after reading all your evidence and seeing the photos”. I stood toe to toe with the inmate at the prison right after this video was posted-see link below. He was not allowed to look at me or talk to me. The CA Parole Board for this hearing were very welcoming, unexpected in these times. I want to encourage anyone facing similar situations to show up, if physically and emotionally able: It was cathartic and empowering! (Victim Services can pay for your airfare and lodging- meals) I will never NOT show up at a Parole hearing the next one is at San Quentin- 2024 He has been incarcerated for his violent murder since 1978 just months after my assault. My drug of choice was “avoidance”, so I worked myself to a disability /43years. Retired Navy 1975-1997 + 100% DV (Concurrent pay) Retired Occupational Therapy 1995-2013 Degree: B.S. Criminology 2016 A.A.S Occupational Therapy Assistant A.S. Criminal Justice https://www.protectourdefenders.com/survivor-story/loris-story-2/ VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT: Surviving Victim 1977 “What does justice look like to you”? Today, you are deciding MY fate as much as this Murder’s fate, based upon his desire to seek revenge on me for his criminal behavior, leading to his Dishonorable Discharge from the Navy, stripping him of his Veteran status, and benefits forever. I remember what it felt like to be me, before the trauma inflicted on me physically and mentally by this inmate, this traumatic event was at age 19, I am now 64! Just think about the daily reminders, I have of a blitz attack upon opening my door in the barracks, being strangled with his hands, screaming for help and biting my tongue almost in half in the process, the white foam from my lungs spilling over the edge of my lips, as I lay dying face down on the floor, he rubs my face in the carpet and it burns my skin embedding the blood into my cheeks. Blood vessels in my eyes burst from the trauma. I had 19 short years to live, was my last thought. My survival was only because he strangled me into unconsciousness and believe me to be dead. I cannot remember a time since that day, I have truly been happy, or felt genuine joy. This one event has “numbed” out my entire life. This “Inmate,” who as we can recall from the May 2019 when asked if he would like to apologize to me, by Commissioner David Long, Taylor stated, “NO”. I was able to read an exert from his past parole hearing, where he stated,” He would kill me to this day” if released. If words matter with this inmate, these words matter. Looking back at his past parole hearing transcripts, He declines to make a statement or answer more than a few words at a time. This is revealing to the psychological deficit of his character. In May 2014 the animosity exhibited toward the Female Commissioner was evident in his resistance and caddy answers to her questions. This is while incarcerated. His good behavior institutionally has not transitioned to any new learned behavior with Women in my humble opinion. And yet the hearing today is to assess his possible reentry into society, one he could not live in the past without killing Women or attempting to. Records I have from 1977 with other assaults described to Naval Investigative Services resulting in serious injuries to another Woman as reported to police. His behavior escalated over time, although he minimizes this, when asked if he had any Juvenile issues. Caught with a gun on a federal facility, taking underage girls in the NCO club, crashing the gate with his motorcycle, sleeping on watch, Slapping the Female bartender when asked to leave the establishment on base, assaulting a woman and her 7-year-old daughter- the mother needed surgery after her assault for broken ear drum, dislocated shoulder. This was because she refused to say, “She would marry him” after he showed up at her apartment at 3 am! (His M.O.) The 7-year-old was thrown across the room and hit a wall. Thankfully, this inmate has never procreated, and due to present day, Erectile Dysfunction with blood pressure issues, this may be even more of a trigger to his violence, upon release. He has declined mental health care and treatment since incarceration in 1978. No medication listed on his records or based on his past oral reports,” none taken”, “just blood pressure”. A cure for Psychopath or Sociopath has yet to be determined from my research. “I have NO IDEA where this behavior comes from,” Taylor states when asked in a past parole hearing. He blames shifts to alcohol, and Women not, “obeying” his orders in both felonies, alcohol will be readily available upon release, in past parole hearing statements, He said, “ALL BETS ARE OFF IF I EVER GET ALCOHOL AGAIN” He now states no drug use, “just alcohol,” but in older parole hearing he states did use Heroin & Marijuana. His diagnosis of Narcistic Personality D/O, Sexual Sadist, Antisocial behavior, Sociopath / Psychopath by DOC staff as of this time are “Untreated,” due to inmate declining all options except solitary mail in treatment lessons with Turning Point / or classes with LTOPP. I point to his 23-page, Psychiatric evaluation of HIGHRISH OFFENDER in February 2019, and STATIC 99 score. He needs to revisit Victim awareness classes since, not apologizing to me in 2019, He has failed this very important curriculum for reentry consideration. No remorse stated ever in past hearings for Kella Robertson, not even a whisper. Recidivism is stated as less risky as the inmate ages, individual cases should be assessed when it comes to High-risk offenders, not generalized by a cohort study. Would you want him living next door to your granddaughter, wife or daughter, or even your grandson? Stated in 2019 Hearing a question was posed about his sexual advances on an inmate. Is he is now seeking sexual gratification from other inmates? This begs the question,” Is this inmate ready now for reentry or will he ever be ready.” Or “Is Society ready”? His “rehab” was not voluntary unless it was through the mail, His transfer to SQ was also not voluntary in September 2019, based on his public defender’s recommendation as a positive rehab move toward Elder Parole criteria. I have proactively taken steps to protect society. FBI –I requested inmate be added to NCIC database with fingerprints and buccal swab for DNA, taken in 2019 at CMC Men’s Colony by FBI agents dispatched to the prison for collection. This will search in perpetuity for other victims. VETETAN AFFAIRS, I requested and contacted to block any reinstatement of his benefits or amendment to his Dishonorable Discharge, included a transcript received from JAG, a synopsis of the autopsy from his Murder conviction to raise awareness of his behavior and diagnosis since 1977. SORNA- I contacted this Nationwide entity with the above transcript and his inmate number, per a POC, he is now scheduled for assessment for SEX Offender registry – based on his NCIC criminal arrests, upon a grant for parole this is also included as a Second Strike in CA, based on Penal Code 290. In past reports to law enforcement, this inmate “admitted” to admiring, “Son of Sam” and stated had been diagnosed with “Mass killing tendencies”. Verify by reading his early parole hearings. Let’s not forget the sewing rats in the Women’s Vagina statements too. Rehab at SQ for one year or two, does not support a cure, much less a manageable reentry into society. This lamenting is in part a therapeutic letter to myself of how I will not be on defense from this inmate or his threats to kill me or torture me, if released. This shows strength through resilience to fight back for his PAST Victims and prevent FUTURE Victims who do not know his dangerousness. I served Honorably in the Navy 22 years. Due to the Military Sexual Trauma, I was granted 100% Disability by VA. This VA rating does not lessen the traumatic mental & physical health issues that accompanies trauma & ongoing lifetime therapy requirements or the fear and limitations it has placed on my life. Please consider the danger I am in if this inmate is release. Your decision of a DENIAL is what stands between me and these threats by the inmate, I take seriously. Respectfully,
  3. Found on: http://www1.va.gov/V...asp?pub_ID=1817 I showed this to my dentist several years ago and he finally agreed to have my teeth cleaned on a regular basis. 10. ELIGIBILITY FOR DENTAL CARE a. General (1) VA Dental Services examine and treat eligible inpatient and outpatient beneficiaries. Eligibility for dental care is governed by statute and provided in accordance with the provisions of existing law and regulations as cited in United State Code., sections 1710© and 1712, and Title 38 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) sections 17.160 through 17.166. Dental eligibility is determined in a different manner than medical eligibility. The Business Office, Health Eligibility Center, holds responsibility for verification of administrative aspects of dental eligibility. It is the responsibility of the Dental Service Chief to make determinations on all clinical aspects of dental eligibility. (2) It is not the established mission of VA to provide dental care to all veterans or even to all those who are hospitalized. The extent of treatment is determined through an understanding of the patient's dental classification and the appropriate scope of dental care to be provided based on that classification. b. Dental Classification. The laws and regulations mandate dental care as a benefit for defined veteran groups. Specific dental classifications have been established that further define patient groups and the appropriate scope of care based on that classification. The nuances of the VHA HANDBOOK 1130.01 December 24, 2008 4 classifications are addressed in the Inpatient, Outpatient and Long Term Care sections of this Handbook. Also see Appendix A for the Scope of Care Quick Reference Guide. (1) The following patient groups are included in the defined dental classification scheme and are to be provided dental care in compliance with VHA regulations and Directives: (a) Residents of VA Residential Rehabilitation Treatment Programs, including Domiciliaries. (b VA Community Living Center (formerly known as Nursing Home Care Unit) residents. © Inpatients with compelling medical need for dental treatment. (d) Patients having a compelling medical need that requires completion of dental care initiated while an inpatient. (e) Outpatient Dental Class I through VI beneficiaries. (f) Outpatients with dental emergencies. (2) The following patient groups are included in the defined dental classification scheme and may be provided dental care if clinic capacity is available. (a) Hospitalized veterans whose dental conditions are not considered to be adjunct to their medical problems. (b Inpatients without other dental entitlement who are active duty military personnel or military retirees. © Specially designated inpatients and outpatients such as those provided for under approved sharing agreements. c. Professional Considerations. VA is obligated to fulfill the requirements of the statutes enacted by Congress and to follow their intent. Every Dental Service has the responsibility to provide care on the basis of the patient's dental classification. A clearly defined and documented treatment plan, consistent with the appropriate scope of care for that patient's classification, will be developed for each episode of care. (1) There is no authority to expand the scope of care beyond the veteran's level of entitlement in order to meet the demands of an educational program as a "teaching case." If a training program is dependent upon types of cases that are not available in sufficient numbers, the scope of that program should be reevaluated. (2) The patient's ability to pay for the cost of private dental care should not be a factor in determining the extent or limitation of dental treatment that will be provided by VA. December 24, 2008 VHA HANDBOOK 1130.01 5 (3) Dental care provided for reasons of medical necessity should not exceed the scope necessary to resolve the condition that is complicating a medical problem. For example, a patient's medical problem may require only the removal of foci of infection. Even though VA may edentulate a patient to resolve the dental condition's impact on a medical problem, VA is not obligated to provide prostheses for this patient. (4) Appropriate dental authorization for outpatient dental care for veterans that have other rated, compensable service connected conditions of the head and neck area is sometimes confusing. Conditions such as loss of soft tissue, scarring or cranial nerve involvement may have significant impact on oral function even though there may be no physical trauma to the dental structures, per se. These non-dental conditions are not rated in the 9900 series of the Schedule for Rating Disabilities (See Appendix bb and are considered medical conditions. The decision as to whether or not dental care will be authorized as adjunctive care (either as Class III or Class VI) will be determined by the Chief, Dental Service, or designee and based on the same criteria as for other medical conditions. d. Scope of Dental Care. Once a patient's dental classification has been properly established, the appropriate scope of care for that patient must be determined. The scope of dental care to be provided can be categorized as Comprehensive, Focused or Emergent/Urgent. The intent of these categories is to facilitate a consistent standard of care throughout all VA dental facilities. (1) Comprehensive Dental Care. Patients eligible for Comprehensive Dental Care receive any dental treatment that is reasonably necessary and clinically determined by the treating dentist to meet the patient's dental needs. A recall program should be established for those patients who are eligible for comprehensive and repeat dental care. The goal of care is to attain and sustain oral health and function including prosthetic rehabilitation as indicated. (2) Focused Dental Care. Focused dental care is intended to resolve a specific dental condition dependent upon, and consistent with the patient's classification. Treatment may include relief of pain, elimination of infection, or improvement of speech or esthetics. It also includes treatment of adjudicated non-compensable service connected teeth (i.e. Class II and Class IIa.) The goal of care is to provide a specific improvement of the oral conditions that directly impact the medical condition (Class III and VI), assist in vocational rehabilitation (Class V), or to provide dental care professionally determined to be medically and functionally appropriate to their status for those in a VA Community Living Center or extended care facility. (a) Consultation requests, when applicable, from non-dental providers must identify the medical condition being aggravated or the management of which is compromised by the dental problem. The Dental Service Chief, or designee, will review the consult and make a final determination based on dental eligibility and scope of care. (b Dental treatment is generally limited and may include supportive periodontal therapy, endodontic therapy, restorative dentistry, and oral surgical procedures. VHA HANDBOOK 1130.01 December 24, 2008 6 © Treatment may also include the fabrication of removable and complete dentures as indicated in the approved treatment plan. Once the episode of care has been completed, subsequent treatment is the responsibility of the patient. (3) Emergent/Urgent Dental Care. Outpatient emergency dental care is provided as a humanitarian service to individuals who do not have established dental eligibility. Dental treatment is limited to that necessary to address acute pain, significant infection, uncontrolled bleeding, or any dental condition that is determined to be a serious threat to health or endangering life. The goal of treatment is to eliminate symptoms and/or remove foci of infection. Dental care is generally limited to one time palliative procedures and appropriate pharmacological therapy. (a) The provision of emergency dental treatment does not entitle the patient to subsequent or follow-up care unless the individual is eligible under some other provision. (b Individuals who are not eligible for VA dental care, but who are provided outpatient emergency dental treatment will be processed in accordance with VA policy and procedures as follows: 1. Veterans presenting at VA medical facilities requesting treatment for acute pain, significant infection or uncontrolled bleeding of oral origin should initially be seen for administrative processing and triage. Triage will include, if applicable, verification of any medical condition for which there is a potential for adjunct (Class III or VI) dental care. 2. If the patient is not eligible or has limited eligibility for outpatient dental care, the patient must be informed of this fact and advised that if emergency treatment is provided for which there is no eligibility, the patient will be billed for treatment. The eligibility clerk or designee will complete and sign the statement of ineligibility on VA Form 10-2570g, Dental Outpatient Emergency Referral and Treatment Record. The applicant will sign the statement of understanding related to the emergency dental care and billing prior to referral to the Dental Service. 3. Dental Service personnel will examine the patient to determine the appropriate course of treatment based on the following options: a. If the condition requires hospitalization, the patient will be returned to the admitting area with the necessary documents for admission. b. If the dental condition can be treated on an outpatient basis and does not require immediate attention, the patient will be referred to community resources at their expense. c. If the dental condition is considered emergent, appropriate care will be provided and documented. 4. Upon treatment completion, a brief description of the emergency treatment provided will be recorded, signed by the treating dentist and returned to the VA office responsible for billing. December 24, 2008 VHA HANDBOOK 1130.01 7 e. Refusal to Accept Dental Services. In those instances when patients refuse to accept Dental Service's recommendations or do not cooperate in receiving treatment, a statement of the facts will be entered into a progress note for consideration and appropriate disposition by the Chief, Dental Service, or designee. f. Treatment Continuation for Patients Who Relocate to Another Geographic Area. A key objective of VA Dentistry is to provide a consistent standard of dental care throughout VA dental facilities. If, however, a patient has a plan of treatment for a scope of care inconsistent with their dental classification, the receiving facility is not obligated to provide care beyond that which is justified. The Dental Service at the new facility will perform an evaluation, update the treatment plan and communicate any changes to the patient. g. Patient Responsibility in Making and Keeping Dental Appointments. Any veteran eligible for dental treatment on a one-time completion basis only and who has not received such treatment within 3 years after filing the application shall be presumed to have abandoned the claim for dental treatment. (38 CFR 17.164) 11. OUTPATIENT DENTAL PROGRAM a. Overview. The goal of VA Dental Services is to provide high quality, cost-effective dental treatment to eligible veterans. All VA dentists will be knowledgeable regarding the scope of care to be provided that is consistent with the patient's dental classification. b. Persons Eligible for Outpatient Dental Care. Statutory eligibility for outpatient dental care is granted to veteran beneficiaries and is provided in accordance with existing law and regulations. Classes of eligible dental outpatients are as follows: (1) Class I. (a) Veterans having a compensable (10% or greater), service connected dental disability or condition (combat or non-combat related) rated under the 9900 series of the Schedule for Rating Disabilities (See Appendix b are eligible for any necessary dental care to maintain or restore oral health and masticatory function, including repeat care. (b Appropriate dental authorization for outpatient dental care for veterans that have other rated, compensable service connected conditions of the head and neck area is sometimes confusing. Conditions such as loss of soft tissue, scarring or cranial nerve involvement may have significant impact on oral function even though there may be no physical trauma to the dental structures, per se. These non-dental conditions are not rated under the 9900 series, are considered medical conditions and are not eligible under Class I. The decision as to whether or not dental care will be authorized as adjunctive care (either as Class III or Class VI) will be determined by the Chief, Dental Service, or designee and based on the same criteria as for other medical conditions. (2) Class II. Veterans having a noncompensable, service connected dental disability shown to have been in existence at the time of discharge or release from active duty may be provided VHA HANDBOOK 1130.01 December 24, 2008 8 any treatment as reasonably necessary for the one-time correction of the noncompensable, service connected dental disability if all of the following criteria are met: (a) They are discharged or released from active duty under conditions other than dishonorable, from a period of active military service of not less than 180 days. In the case of Gulf War Era, Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans, they are discharged or released from active duty under conditions other than dishonorable from a period of active military service of not less than 90 days. (b Application for dental treatment is made within 180 days of discharge or release from active duty. © The certificate of discharge or release certifies that the veteran was not provided, within the 90 day period immediately before discharge or release, a complete dental examination (including dental radiographs) and all appropriate dental treatment indicated by the examination was completed. This certification is found on the DD214, line 17. (d) Scope of care for Class II. 1. One Episode of Class II Care. When Class II eligibility for a one-time episode of dental care has been exhausted by satisfactory completion of the authorized treatment, no further care will be provided. Class II dental beneficiaries who (through no fault of the VA) have not completed authorized treatment within 3 years after filing the application shall be presumed to have abandoned the claim for dental treatment. 2. Dental Prostheses and Implants Provided by VA. Class II dental beneficiaries are not entitled to long term maintenance of fixed or removable dental prostheses or dental implants. Once adjustments are satisfactory, the episode of prosthetic care is considered to be complete and subsequent treatment is the responsibility of the patient. 3. Periodontal Conditions. Specific treatment authorized for periodontal conditions of Class II beneficiaries is expected to provide maximum benefit by the time that episode of care is completed. When that treatment is satisfactorily completed as authorized, VA will not furnish any further treatment or follow-up for the periodontal condition. 4. Impacted Teeth. Impacted teeth are a developmental condition. Consideration for surgical extraction should be based on sound professional judgment to resolve existing disease or symptoms. 5. Malposed Teeth. Malposed teeth are considered a developmental abnormality and a pre-existing condition. VA will not provide orthodontic care in this circumstance. For cases in which trauma incurred in the line of duty resulted in malalignment of the teeth or when restorative procedures for which the patient is eligible require orthodontic intervention, orthodontic care may be provided. 6. Veterans with Orthodontic Appliances. When veterans arrive at VA facilities with orthodontic appliances for the purpose of correcting developmental malocclusion and have not December 24, 2008 VHA HANDBOOK 1130.01 9 had their treatment completed by the military prior to discharge, they need to be instructed to contact the dental clinic at their last active duty military assignment to arrange for completion of the care. If the military does not complete the orthodontic treatment, VA is not obligated to assume the responsibility of any phase of the orthodontic care unless directly related to rehabilitation of combat trauma to the maxillofacial region. 7. Service Connection of Dental Conditions for Treatment Purposes. Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) may, upon request, provide documentation to the Dental Service defining service connection of specific teeth for dental treatment purposes. (38 CFR 3.381). The regulation provides for identification of teeth treated during military service, and applies only to Class II beneficiaries who have met the criteria as specified in Para. 11 b.(2)(a-c). The Chief or designee can use the document to assist in development of appropriate treatment recommendations. (3) Class IIA. Those veterans having a noncompensable, service connected dental disability adjudicated as resulting from combat wounds or service trauma are eligible for repeat care and maintenance or replacement of the involved tooth/teeth. A Dental Trauma Rating (VA Form 10-564-D) or VA Regional Office Rating Decision letter (VA Form 10-7131) identifies the tooth/teeth eligible for care. Public Law 83, 84th Congress, Chapter 52, H.R. 5100, Approved June 16, 1955 invalidates old dental ratings and eligibility letters dated before 1955. Prior to 1955, teeth that received routine dental care while the veteran was on active duty were listed as "service connected". Patients with these dental ratings are not eligible for repeat care for the listed "service connected" teeth. (4) Class IIC. Veterans who were Prisoners of War (POWs) are eligible for any needed dental care, including repeat care. (5) Class III. Veterans with a dental condition professionally determined by VA to be aggravating or complicating the management of a service connected medical condition under active treatment are eligible for care to treat the dental condition. The goal is to provide focused care to treat only the oral conditions that directly impact the management of the service-connected medical condition. Eligibility for each episode of dental care must be predicated on referral (consult), followed by a new dental evaluation. (6) Class IV. Veterans whose service connected disabilities have been rated at 100 percent (total) or who are receiving the 100 percent rate by reason of individual unemployability are eligible for any needed dental care, including repeat care, with the following exception: a veteran awarded a temporary total disability rating by the Veterans Benefits Administration is not eligible for comprehensive outpatient dental services based on an opinion by VA General Counsel (023) to the Under Secretary for Health (16), February 24, 2006, VAOPGCADV 2-2006. Determination of temporary status is the responsibility of the eligibility section of the Business Office. (7) Class V (a) A veteran who is actively engaged in a Chapter 31 vocational rehabilitation program is entitled to dental care to the extent needed to meet any of the following goals listed: VHA HANDBOOK 1130.01 December 24, 2008 10 1. make possible his or her entrance into a rehabilitation program, 2. achieve the goals of the veteran's vocational rehabilitation program, 3. prevent interruption of a rehabilitation program, 4. hasten the return to a rehabilitation program of a veteran in interrupted or leave status, 5. hasten the return to a rehabilitation program of a veteran placed in discontinued status because of a dental condition, 6. secure and adjust to employment during the period of employment assistance, or 7. enable the veteran to achieve maximum independence in daily living. (b Requests for dental care will be forwarded to the Dental Service by the Chapter 31 Vocational Rehabilitation Program on VA Form 28-8861. This form needs to be provided for each episode of care requested. Dental care should not be provided beyond the anticipated rehabilitation date as specified on the form. (8) Class VI (a) Any veteran scheduled for admission or who is receiving outpatient care under 38 U.S.C. may receive dental care if the dental condition is clinically determined to be complicating the non-service connected medical condition currently under VA treatment. Eligibility for each episode of dental care will be predicated on referral and consultation, followed by a decision based upon clinical judgment. The goal is to provide focused care to treat only the oral conditions that directly impact the management of the non-service connected medical condition. (b Certain homeless and other enrolled veterans also are eligible for a one-time course of dental care per VHA policy, Public Law 107-95 and Title 38 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 2062. Dental workload for veterans participating in this program is recorded under the Class VI dental outpatient classification. (9) Other Beneficiaries. Other beneficiaries who may be eligible for dental care in VA dental clinics on an outpatient basis, subject to and consistent with the provision of existing laws, VA regulations, and the availability of VA resources are: (a) Armed Forces Personnel on Active Duty. Authority from the Commanding Officer of the military installation should accompany the request for dental treatment. However, if extenuating circumstances are present, treatment of the emergent dental condition may be accomplished prior to the receipt of authority. Emergency dental treatment for members of the Armed Forces on active duty will be limited to such treatment as is found necessary for the relief of pain and control of acute infection, trauma or hemorrhage. December 24, 2008 VHA HANDBOOK 1130.01 11 (b Armed Forces Personnel in VA Polytrauma Centers. Active duty military personnel with spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury or blindness who are receiving treatment in a VA polytrauma center are eligible to receive dental care under a direct resource sharing agreement in accordance with Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense Memorandum of Agreement regarding referral of active duty military personnel with effective date January 1, 2007. Dental services will be billed at the interagency rate, where one exists, or at actual cost as appropriate. © VA Employees. VA employees may be provided emergency dental treatment only to the extent necessary to permit the employee to remain on duty. Provision of care is predicated on referral from the employee health program. Employees with emergent conditions that may require follow-up care will be advised to seek private care at their expense. Injuries incurred in the performance of duty may receive necessary emergency treatment. (d) Beneficiaries of Sharing Agreements. Treatment provided will be dependent on the specific language of the agreement. (10) Disability Evaluation Examinations for Compensation and Pension Rating Purposes. Requests for an oral examination are submitted to the Dental Service at the request of the Regional Office. Examination findings must be accurately and comprehensively reported and the patient coded as a Category 20. Examinations must be completed within the timeframe required by VBA.
  4. http://vetlawyers.co...nn+%26+Moore%29 "Bergmann & Moore Testify Before Congress: VA Disability Claim Error Rate Hits 26 percent in Oakland Regional Office On April 24, 2012, in B&M News, Department of Veterans Affairs, Disabled Veterans, In the News, Politics, VA Disability Benefits, Veterans, Veterans Law, by VetLawyers "The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) made a stunning admission at last week’s Congressional hearing about VA’s backlog inventory of 1.1 million claims. For the first time, VA revealed more than one-in-four disability compensation claims processed by VA’s beleaguered Oakland office are riddled with errors. Almost all of VA mistakes are against Veterans, forcing them to appeal. Paul Sullivan, managing director of public affairs & veterans outreach here at Bergmann & Moore, testified before the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee. Reporters from the Military Times, NextGov, and the Washington Post covered the hearing. Sullivan told Congress that when VBA speeds up claim processing, VA makes mistakes. Then Veterans must appeal, often with the assistance of a private practitioner such as Bergmann & Moore. Sullivan remains especially concerned about the impact of delays on veterans with psychological conditions. Being forced to wait months or years for healthcare and disability benefits for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injuries (TBI), and military sexual trauma (MST) can often worsen a Veteran’s health. VBA’s Director of Compensation Service Tom Murphy confirmed VBA leaders had met with Veterans advocates, including Sullivan, and were willing to grant attorneys and agents access to their clients’ computer and paper VA files. Murphy also pledged to lawmakers that staff at Oakland’s VBA Regional Office would receive additional training in coming months to improve productivity and quality. U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-Texas), a member of the Committee, admonished VA during his opening remarks: “VA should remember that ‘VA’ should stand for ‘Veteran Advocate’ and not ‘Veteran Adversary.’” Wednesday’s hearing was titled, “From the Inside Out: A Look at Claims Representatives’ Role in the Disability Claims Process.” Bergmann & Moore testified on behalf of the National Organization of Veterans’ Advocates. The hearing was held as investigative journalist Aaron Glantz of the Bay Citizen reported on very serious problems our Veterans face at VBA’s Oakland Regional Office: April 15: “Veterans’ Disability Claims Buried Under Paperwork: The average wait for a decision in the Bay Area is now 313 days.” April 16: “VA Pledges to Overhaul Disability Claims System: Promise comes after The Bay Citizen reveals Bay Area veterans wait an average of 313 days.” April 19: “Send Immediate Help’ to Oakland’s VA, Say Bay Area Reps: Letter to veterans secretary cites ‘extreme disappointment’ over decision not to overhaul troubled office”
  5. I have somewhere in my personal files a contemporaneous "restricted report" of some hazing against me that involved forced sodomy. I never claimed it but I do have ratings for depression and anxiety at the most appropriate percentage. Is there a point in me ever claiming MST? I don't know if this is a Pandora's Box that I want to open. Opinions would be appreciated.
  6. An Overview on DIC for Survivors of Veterans The death of a veteran spouse often brings more unique situations to the surviving spouse then a non veteran's death. Both types of deaths are as equally devastating and there is a lot to do in spite of dealing with the grief. Many veterans here have already established a Death file . We have done SVR shows on this and there is discussion here at hadit as well on that. http://www.svr-radio.com/archives.html (May 5th and May 12th , 2010) This file is a good place for copies of the DD 214/215, info on SGLI Life Insurance and other insurance policies, passwords the veteran uses that the spouse might need for paying online bills, and certainly for their hadit password, after they expire. Also the Marriage license, birth certificates of the children, any divorce decree papers etc etc, VA award letters and SSA award letters, all should be in this special file .Many vets here already have the blank 21-534 form in their death files. I have a large death file that contains my bank info, insurance policies, my will and Health Care proxy, passwords and even photos of where my septic tank lid is, where the well is, and how to turn the main power to the house and the barn off and on, photos of how the TV, and component cables are attached, and even a photo of how I set up my garden hoses to the main water line. As a widow, it also contains my VA Deed to the same plot at the VA Cemetery where my husband is buried. Also my file contains my signed statement that I am an Organ Donor. An advocate friend of mine has literally written a book for his wife when he dies, along with the important documents I mentioned above. Sometimes our spouses really don't know how to shut off water mains right away if a pipe breaks or how to change a blown fuse.The deed to the home should be in the death file too as it is one of many documents a survivor has to get changed,when their spouse has died. If your spouse is an organ donor or has mentioned that in their wishes, if not formally recorded by their PCP or on their driver's license,or in their death file , the Organ Harvest people make that call within hours of death and the survivor needs to be prepared for it. Organ harvests involve an autopsy and this autopsy could end up being the most important evidence a survivor can have, regarding many DIC claims, as it will be far more detailed than the death certificate. Of course an autopsy almost always involves cremation.These are things we all need to consider in our lifetimes. And burial in a National Cemetery,for the surviving spouse, eventually ,means they need to know that if the deceased veteran has been cremated and rests in the Cremains section of the cemetery, then the spouse will need to be cremated too, to fit on top of the veteran's grave. Also the VA as well as SSA (if the veteran receives SSA or SSDI, )should be informed ASAP of the veteran's death. Often the coroner will ask the surviving spouse for any conditions that that veteran had in their lifetime that the coroner can not list as the immediate cause of death. If a service connected disability has contributed substantially to death, that should be put onto the death certificate by the coroner.Also the coroner will ask what medications the veteran was prescribed. A list of them should be put in the death file and updated as needed. Death certificates are usually ten dollars each or maybe a little more. You might need more then you think.Also the Probate Court in your county can help with the various forms needed eventually for Probate and this is often a job you can do yourself,if the veteran died intestate (without a will). When a Funeral Director is contacted , he/she will need the veteran's DD214, and any 215 if one was issued, and since they often prepare the Obit, you will want to think about what it should contain. I wrote my husband's Obituary myself.The funeral director checked it against his 214 and 215 and had it published verbatim. If your spouse is being buried in a National Cemetery, make sure the Funeral Director and the VA knows of your wishes for a Military funeral: http://www.cem.va.gov/military_funeral_honors.asp http://www.cem.va.gov/burial_benefits/ The link to burial benefits does not include this information for surviving spouses of deceased service connected veterans as to burial expense and plot allowances here: http://www.benefits.va.gov/BENEFITS/factsheets/burials/Burial.pdf DIC: Dependents and Indemnity Compensation The DIC application VA form 21-534 is here: http://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/vba-21-534-are.pdf Although the form mentions if the veteran had ever filed a claim with the VA before,I suggest to note under Remarks, if there was a claim pending at time of death and the survivor should also fill out, sign, copy and attach (and refer to under Remarks) the Substitution form: It is explained here: You need to file the 534 and the Substitution form within one year after the veteran's death for any potential accrued benefits to be paid to you. The EZ 534 is here: http://www.veteransaidbenefit.org/forms/21-534EZ.pdf An Accrued benefits claim must be supported with evidence as well as the DIC claim and they are handled as two separate issues with the VA. Also I noticed that VA does not include the REPS application anymore along with the DIC app. REPS Restored Entitlement Program. My vet reps didnt even know what REPS was at all. It can involve a considerable amount of money. Here is the form that states which specific survivors are eligible for REPS: http://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/VBA-21-8924-ARE.pdf After receipt of a DIC application the survivor will receive a VCAA letter that must include the Hupp decision. As Military.com states: "DIC is a monthly benefit paid to eligible survivors of the following: Military service member who died while on active duty, OR Veteran whose death resulted from a service-related injury or disease, OR Veteran whose death resulted from a non service-related injury or disease, and who was receiving, or was entitled to receive, VA Compensation for service-connected disability that was rated as totally disabling for at least 10 years immediately before death, OR since the veteran's release from active duty and for at least five years immediately preceding death, OR for at least one year before death if the veteran was a former prisoner of war who died after September 30, 1999. “ http://www.military.com/benefits/survivor-benefits/dependency-and-indemnity-compensation.html DIC is also paid under a Section 1151 death, as explained below,with a more detailed description of each type of DIC here: 1.. Cause of Death “In order to establish service connection for the cause of a veteran's death, the evidence must show that a disability incurred in or aggravated by active service was the principal or contributory cause of death. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1310; 38 C.F.R. § 3.312(a). In order to constitute the principal cause of death the service-connected disability must be one of the immediate or underlying causes of death or be etiologically related to the cause of death. 38 C.F.R. § 3.312(b). In the case of contributory cause of death, it must be shown that a service- connected disability contributed substantially or materially to cause death. 38 C.F.R. § 3.312(c)(1). Service connection for the cause of a veteran's death may be demonstrated by showing that the veteran's death was caused by a disability for which service connection had been established at the time of death or for which service connection should have been established. Service connection means that the facts, shown by evidence, establish that a particular injury or disease resulting in disability was incurred in the line of duty in the active military service or, if pre-existing such service, was aggravated during service. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131; 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(a). Service connection generally requires evidence of a current disability with a relationship or connection to an injury or disease or some other manifestation of the disability during service. Boyer v. West, 210 F.3d 1351, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Mercado-Martinez v. West , 11 Vet. App. 415, 419 (1998) (citing Cuevas v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 542, 548 (1992)). Where the determinative issue involves medical causation or a medical diagnosis, there must be competent evidence to the effect that the claim is plausible. Lay evidence can be competent and sufficient to establish a diagnosis of a condition when (1) a layperson is competent to identify the medical condition, (2) the layperson is reporting a contemporaneous medical diagnosis, or (3) lay testimony describing symptoms at the time supports a later diagnosis by a medical professional. Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2007).” This means that either a primary cause of death is listed on the death certificate, as cause of death, or that a service connected condition is listed as a contributing cause of death. http://www.va.gov/vetapp10/files4/1039644.txt For example, a death certificate of a non - AO vet lists NSC heart disease as prime cause of death but with diabetes as a substantially contributing cause. If the diabetes has been service connected, the survivor should succeed with the DIC claim, although it might take an IMO if the veteran had not pursued the heart disease as secondary to the diabetes. DIC Under 38 USC 1318: Governing Laws and Regulations for 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 Claim: “Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, VA death benefits may be paid to a deceased Veteran's surviving spouse or children in the same manner as if the Veteran's death is service-connected, even though the Veteran died of non-service-connected causes, if the Veteran's death was not the result of his or her own willful misconduct and at the time of death, the Veteran was receiving, or was "entitled to receive," compensation for service-connected disability that (1) was continuously rated as totally disabling for the 10 years immediately preceding death, (2) was continuously rated as totally disabling for a period of not less than 5 years from the date of his discharge or release from active duty or (3) was continuously rated as totally disabling for a period of not less than one year immediately preceding death, and the Veteran was a former prisoner of war (POW) who died after September 30, 1999. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 (West 2002 & Supp. 2012); 38 C.F.R. § 3.22(a) (2012). The total rating may be schedular or may be a total disability rating based on unemployability (TDIU).” 38 C.F.R. § 3.22(c). “The term "entitled to receive" means that, at the time of death, the Veteran had filed a claim for disability compensation during his lifetime, and the Veteran had service-connected disability rated totally disabling by VA for the requisite time period, but was not receiving compensation due to six possible circumstances: (1) VA was paying the compensation to the Veteran's dependents; (2) VA was withholding the compensation under authority of 38 U.S.C. § 5314 to offset an indebtedness of the Veteran; (3) the Veteran had not waived retired or retirement pay in order to receive compensation; (4) VA was withholding payments under the provisions of 10 U.S.C. § 1174(h)(2); (5) VA was withholding payments because the Veteran's whereabouts was unknown, but the Veteran was otherwise entitled to continued payments based on a total service-connected disability rating; or (6) VA was withholding payments under 38 U.S.C. § 5308 but determines that benefits were payable under 38 U.S.C. § 5309.” 38 C.F.R. § 3.22(b)(3). In addition, the term "entitled to receive" can mean that the Veteran filed a claim for disability compensation during his lifetime and one of the following two circumstances is met: (1) the Veteran would have received total disability compensation at the time of death for a service-connected disability rated totally disabling for the period specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section but for clear and unmistakable error (CUE) committed by VA in a decision on a claim filed during the Veteran's lifetime concerning the issues of service connection, disability evaluation, or effective date; or (2) additional evidence submitted to VA before or after the Veteran's death, consisting solely of service department records that existed at the time of a prior VA decision but were not previously considered by VA, provides a basis for reopening a claim finally decided during the Veteran's lifetime and for awarding a total service-connected disability rating retroactively in accordance with §§ 3.156(c) and 3.400(q)(2) of this part for the relevant period specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. 38 C.F.R. § 3.22(b)(1) and (2). The Federal Circuit has ruled that § 1318 DIC claims are not subject to a "hypothetical entitlement" analysis. Rodriguez v. Peake, 511 F.3d 1147, 1156 (2008). See also Tarver v. Shinseki, 557 F.3d 1371, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2009). In essence, under Rodriguez and Tarver, the amended regulation 38 C.F.R. § 3.22 does not have an impermissible retroactive effect, and it may be applied to bar DIC claims filed by survivors under the "hypothetical entitlement" theory, no matter when the § 1318 claim was filed. Simply put, there is no longer "hypothetical entitlement" to DIC benefits under any circumstance. Therefore, the state of the law is such that claims for DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 must be adjudicated with specific regard given to decisions made during the Veteran's lifetime and without consideration of hypothetical entitlement for benefits raised for the first time after a Veteran's death. See again Rodriguez v. Peake, 511 F.3d 1147 (2008). http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/view.jsp?FV=http://www.va.gov/vetapp13/Files3/1327019.txt DIC payable under Section 1151,38 USC: Title 38 U.S.C. 1151 Claims “Title 38 U.S.C. Section 1151 allows VA to pay compensation for death or disability "as if service-connected." Don't be confused with this subtle difference. The disability is not considered service-connected. Under Section 1151, benefits may be paid for: Injuries incurred or aggravated while receiving VA-sponsored medical treatment. Injuries incurred or aggravated while pursuing a course of vocational rehabilitation under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 31 or participating in compensated work therapy under 38 U.S.C. 1718. If eligibility is established under Section 1151, the disability is considered service-connected for payment purposes ONLY. Eligibility Requirements You must be a Veteran You must have a disabling condition that is the result of or has been aggravated due to VA sponsored medical treatment or training Evidence Requirements As a result of VA hospitalization, medical or surgical treatment, examination, or training, the evidence must show you have: An additional disability or disabilities, OR An aggravation of an existing injury or disease, AND The disability was: The direct result of VA fault such as carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, or error in judgment, OR Not a reasonably expected result or complication of the VA care or treatment OR The direct result of participation in a VA Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment or compensated work therapy program. “ http://www.benefits.va.gov/COMPENSATION/claims-special-1151.asp In the case of a surviving spouse, it should clearly be indicated on the 21-534 form that this is a claim for death of the veteran due to negligence, under Section 38 USC, 1151. This type of claim for VA negligence as the cause of the veteran's death will need probative medical documentation ,almost always in the form of a strong IMO, to support this type of DIC claim ,in order to provide a full medical rationale. FTCA claims can be filed simultaneously with claims under 1151 for DIC, but any favorable FTCA award will be offset to the DIC compensation payable, until the settlement amount from FTCA is recovered by the VA. DIC monthly amounts include that which is for any children under 18. Also there is more info on that here: http://www.benefits.va.gov/compensation/resources_comp03.asp In some cases parents of deceased veterans are eligible for DIC and that info is here: http://benefits.va.gov/BENEFITS/factsheets/survivors/parentsdic.pdf Eligibility Requirements; what is a surviving spouse for VA purposes: A surviving spouse may qualify for pension, compensation or dependency and dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC), if the marriage to the Veteran occurred before or during his service, or after his service if certain requirements are met. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1541; 38 C.F.R. § 3.54. Under the regulations, a "surviving spouse" is defined, in part, as a person of the opposite sex whose marriage to the Veteran meets the requirements of 38 C.F.R. § 3.1(j) and who was the spouse of the Veteran at the time of the Veteran's death. 38 C.F.R. § 3.50. VA defines a "marriage" as a marriage valid under the law of the place where the parties resided at the time of marriage or the laws of the place where the parties resided when the right to benefits accrued. 38 U.S.C.A. § 103©; 38 C.F.R. § 3.1(j). In jurisdictions where marriages other than by ceremony are recognized, marriage is established by the affidavits or certified statements of one or both of the parties to the marriage, if living, setting forth all of the facts and circumstances concerning the alleged marriage, such as the agreement between the parties at the beginning of their cohabitation, the period of cohabitation, places and dates of residences, and whether children were born as the result of the relationship. This evidence should be supplemented by affidavits or certified statements from two or more persons who know as the result of personal observation the reputed relationship which existed between the parties to the alleged marriage including the periods of cohabitation, places of residences, whether the parties held themselves out as married, and whether they were generally accepted as such in the communities in which they lived. Marriage may also be established by any other secondary evidence which reasonably supports a belief by the adjudicating activity that a valid marriage actually occurred. 38 C.F.R. § 3.205(a). In the absence of conflicting information, proof of marriage which meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section together with the claimant's certified statement concerning the date, place and circumstances of dissolution of any prior marriage may be accepted as establishing a valid marriage, provided that such facts, if they were to be corroborated by record evidence, would warrant acceptance of the marriage as valid. 38 C.F.R. § 3.205(b) A surviving spouse should always try to find a good vet rep to help with the DIC claim. Regardless of what the rep says they have sent in to the VA, the survivor should keep copies of everything , to include their filled out DIC form, and double check that VA has received everything they send. VA will not allow us survivors to use ebenefits but the ebenefit section ( # 5 I think on the phone pad), after you call 1-800-827-1000 will give you a status from a VA rep if you can hold on the line for a while. Office of Survivors Assistance VA...http://www.va.gov/survivors/ This office is an excellent resources for survivors who have questions that do not regard their DIC claims. For example there is info at this site on bereavment counselling available to survivors through the VA.They have a direct email addy as well at the site. Hadit has had superb discussions here in our DIC forum as to all of the nuances of the DIC benefit and advice to many, as each DIC claim can be either a very simple one or can be actually quite complex. Also Tbird has put an entire Survivors packet here: http://www.hadit.com/veterans_dependent_survivor_package/veterans_dependent_survivor_package.html Surviving spouses of veterans, even if they had been very involved in the spouse's VA issues, find there is a lot to the DIC process and will also learn that our motto here, Knowledge is Power, is what can sustain them and that knowledge can hopefully reverse any DIC denial they might get. If the survivor is age 60 or older, (age 50 if disabled)they can consider receiving an early SSA survivors benefit: http://www.ssa.gov/survivorplan/ifyou2.htm I only wish that some of the above information was available to me long ago when I was widowed of a veteran. Grief can stop us in our tracks and even cause us to put off filling out the many forms and sundry paperwork that the death of a spouse involves. I even had many flashbacks as I prepared this article,because ,when I was newly widowed , I was dealing with a pre -internet VA, whose web site holds a wealth of info now, yet I did have the VBM by NVLSP and that gave me good direction for my initial DIC claim. Also I advise to file for SC death under more than one theory if possible. If one theory fails, than perhaps the next one will succeed. That is good advice for any veteran claimant as well, to raise as many logical theories of entitlement ,as possible, to gain service connection. Meghp0405 has added this important advice: “Submit a VA FM 21-534ez for DIC claims. I've also submitted this form along with a VA FM 21-526ez, FDC. The response times that I've experienced using this process is around 90 days.. The DIC claims have been directed to the Milwaukee VARO. I've always submitted the applications right to that office instead of the local VARO. Saves some time.. hope this helps”
  7. This is a potential monetary award to any survivor of a deceased veteran who was also survived by any child or children who received SSA survivors Benefits as well as some children in their own right- as explained in the REPS regulation for any direcvtly service connected death-which could include many widows/widowers claims under the new AO presumptives. The REPS application is at the back of the DIC 21-534 application. "Incurred or aggravated prior to August 13,1981" certainly covers awards for SC deaths of Vietnam vets whose survivors might now fall under the new AO regulations. Under the provisions of section 156 of Public Law 97-377 and 38 C.F.R. § 3.812 (1992), a special allowance is payable to certain surviving spouses and children of individuals who died on active duty prior to August 13, 1981, or who died as a result of a service connected disability which was incurred or aggravated prior to August 13, 1981. This allowance, known as REPS benefits, was a replacement for certain social security benefits which were either reduced or terminated by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981. Pub. L. No. 97-33, § 2205, 95 Stat. 837 (l98l). Among those who are potentially eligible for REPS benefits are unmarried children of the veteran between the ages of 18 and 22 who are attending a post-secondary school on a full- time basis. Retroactive benefits, that is, benefits for a period of time prior to the date of the claim for such benefits, may only be paid under certain circumstances which are set forth in 38 C.F.R. § 3.812(f). With respect to any claim which is received more than one year after May 23, 1984, but within six months following the month in which the claimant first became eligible for special allowance payable under Section 156 of Public Law 97-377 (REPS), benefits shall be payable for all periods beginning on or after the first day of the month that the claimant first became eligible for this special allowance. See 58 Fed Reg. 34524-5 (l993). And here is a OGC pres Op generated since the above regs were written -that clarifies the retro period: http://www.hadit.com/VA_General_Counsel_Precedent_Opinions/p2002_action/displayglossarydetails/p2002_glossaryid/89
  8. After two long years, I just received a denial and the SOC from the VARO for service connected ptsd due to MST and I am absolutely sick about it. I really need help on where to turn now because I want to continue to fight this, but it seems like no matter what evidence I submit, service connection for PTSD due to MST is almost impossible to achieve. The SOC I received stated that "You have submitted copies of emails, letters, journals entries and documents from the Army indicating evidence of military sexual trauma. Based on all the evidence received, we have conceded that you did suffer from military sexual trauma during your military service. Treatment reports from VAMC/Outpatient Clinic show you have received treatment for PTSD symptoms and for major depressive disorder. VA examination dated on February 14, 2012, states you have a diagnosis of PTSD and dysthymia disorder. The examiner provides the opinion that she cannot say with confidence that your military sexual trauma experiences meet criteria A for PTSD. The examiner also states she cannot resolve that the issue of PTSD is a result of your military experience without resort to mere speculation. Service connection for PTSD remains denied. Although we conceded that you were exposed to traumatic events during your military service, to include military sexual trauma, we have not received any medical evidence that your PTSD is the result of your military sexual trauma. We have requested 2 different VA examinations, with 2 different examiners and both have been unable to provide a medical opinion that your PTSD is the result of your military sexual trauma. The treatment reports from the Outpatient clinic show you have received treatment for PTSD symptoms associated with your history of military sexual trauma. However, these reports do not provide a medical opinion and rationale that your PTDS is due to military sexual trauma, and the result of other trauma." My MH doctor specifically told me her medical notes were more vague due to my privacy, so If I asked her to write a medical opinion and rationale that my PTSD is due to MST, would this help? Should I go to a civilian MH doctor to gain another opinion? I was sent a Form 9 and must state why I think the VA decided my case incorrectly. Is it time for a lawyer? I didn't received much help from the VFW due to the VSOs lack of experience and uncomfortableness with MST. I am trying to find records from an outpatient base clinic in Hawaii which will show pregnancy test, STD test and other sickness from the timeframe of MST. It seems the VA wants to link PTSD to me witnessing molestation of daughter almost 15 years after MST instead of all that happened during active duty. Can anyone PLEASE advise me? I feel so hurt, betrayed and now even angry, especially that the VA conceded that I was exposed to MST during my military service. My original post on Hadit was under the PTSD Disorder Claim and was called PTSD/MST Denial as well, but this seems to be a more suitable area to post now.
  9. Hey all, First off, love this page it has been extremely helpful! Background: currently at 90% / 70-ptsd, 50-migraines, 10-iritis, 10-tinnitus, and I’m in the running for 100 at the moment. Current day: Was content at 90 but after all these years I have finally come out about my MST when I was in the infantry. Still working stuff out on that end as this is still fresh... Anyway, I submitted a claim for sleep apnea because of the MST. I submitted the following: picture of CPAP machine I use in my house, nexus statement from issuing doctor, Nexus statement from other doctor stating the sleep apnea is due to trauma from MST, copy of sleep study confirming I have sleep apnea from doctor listed above and buddy statements as well as the formal submission paperwork of my MST to three levels of my chain of command, NCO, O3, O5 etc... Wrap this all up with a successful expedited hardship approval and you now have me waiting for answers. Well today (a few moments prior to writing this) I found out I am getting a C&P exam for this...I almost feel like this is a slap in the face...I mean how am I to go up to that examiner and explain all this when I literally gave it all to them... Has anyone been in my shoes before??? Thank you all.
  10. Hello everyone. I've been searching this website and yukon website for my answers and I guess I just want to ask this question again because the answers I'm seeing are from 2011 or so and I want to make sure it's still valid for 2017. I got out of the service on medical discharge for fibromyalgia, MDD, and GAD in 2008. I was unable to tell anyone about my MST that happened prior to me developing Fibro (which I found out is usually connected to PTSD). Anyrate, since then I have talked to the VA Psychs for help and tried to "fix" myself and finally I opened up and told them about my MST and received a diagnosis of PTSD in 2013. Then in 2016 my VA Primary Care told me to reapply for benefits because she said they need to service connect me for my PTSD. I submitted my application, was honest and straight forward and very forthcoming even though I cried through my Comp and Pen exam. I have used Voc Rehab to change careers from Nuclear Electronics Technician to an Ultrasound Tech, and have worked as a tech from 2012-2014. After 2014 I quit working when my daughter was born, but also my fibromyalgia was flaring up so bad that it made it impossible to work anymore. I haven't worked since. Voc Rehab screwed up my award and didn't close out my case so I still have benefits left over and I was approved with a severe work handicap to use my benefits to go back to school after the birth of my second child. So here I was waiting for my disability decision and studying for the GRE to apply to a Nurse Practitioner Program helping women only because I have PTSD attacks with men. I was hoping that wouldn't be as hard on me as my Ultrasound position was. Then I get the decision stating that I am 100% P&T for PTSD, and 60% combined for fibromyalgia and hearing issues from the Navy, all service connected, and I'm getting SMC for Homebound criteria being met. I called the VA directly to find out if that meant that I wasn't allowed to work anymore. (I didn't plan on going to school until 2019, and not trying to work again until 2022.) The VA rep said that I WAS allowed to work and they may evaluated me in the future for my PTSD, and 'could' lower my rating, but that the rating wouldn't be lowered if I still met the criteria for 100% PTSD, it wouldn't have anything to do with whether or not I was working. The American Legion rep said I was allowed to work as well. But then when I read these forums it says I'm not allowed to work. I know already that Voc Rehab wouldn't pay for me to do the Nurse Practitioner schooling anymore because I was having difficulties trying to get them to approve it when I had a 50% rating, and now that I'm higher I know without a doubt they wouldn't allow it, so I understand I'm not going to be a Nurse Practitioner for Women's Health anymore. So I guess what I'm so upset about is accepting the fact that I can't work. I will have two children that I don't want to lose the education benefits for whatsoever, and everything else that's included with the 100% rating. No way in heck I want to lose that! It will sit easier with me if I get approved for SSDI. But that terrifies me too! I'm waiting for an appointment to apply in person because I'm scared I'll mess it up doing it online. So, confirmation: I cannot work if I don't want to risk losing any benefits, correct? And what are the do's and don'ts as far as what I should do in order to keep this disability rating for the next 19 years? I think that terrifies the most, screwing up and having my rating decreased. I know we are all stressed about this, please forgive me for this long post. And thank you all for your service and your advice. Peace and Love.
  11. OK, so went to my pc and created an instruction guide for uploading documents to eBenefits. How to upload documents to eBenefits Created 18 July 2014. Requirements: Scanner, pc and Microsoft Office software. Place document to be scanned face down on your flatbed scanner or scan feeder facedown. Select scan feature on the scanner software on your pc. Select monochrome text, unless you are scanning a photo- then select color photo option. This should automatically select the 200 x 200 dpi option on your scanner. This will scan the document as a jpeg file, which is one of the acceptable file formats that eBenefits will accept. Select save on the scanner software that is on your pc. Suggest you save to your desktop or some easily accessible file folder Hold your mouse over the selected icon for the scanned document, Right click to see options, choose open with MICROSOFT OFFICE. This will open as an M/S Office picture. Go to tool bar at top and open PICTURE option Scroll down to RESIZE. Click this option. Go to right side of screen and select custom width and height, the pc will automatically select 1024 x 768 pixels. Use this if just uploading one or two documents. Select OK. If uploading many pages, select preferred width and height from the options in # 12. Select WEB Large, 640 x 480 pixels then select OK. Then go to top, open file give this new document a name and save in a folder, either your desktop or create a new folder that is easily accessible. Note: when you save, it will display the default file name, change it to whatever you want and it will also display JPEG file interchange format. Then select OK. I hope this is not too confusing, but this works for me. Sorry if you are using an Apple device as no experience with them. I use M/S 10 and also have M/S 13 on my pc, and Brother MFCJ875DW scanner with a Brother HL 5370DW laser printer. Experienced persons may load say 10-12 documents in the top feed scanner and do same thing, but make sure you check each page and give it a name and number. Always make sure that the scanned item is legible. ONE LAST WORD, DO NOT TRUST EBENEFITS, ALWAYS SEND YOUR DOCUMENTS BY CERTIFIED MAIL AS WELLJ Vern, aka Hamster ManJ
  12. This is my first post in hadit, but I've been reading for nearly a year, thank you for your wisdom! I've faced a lot of criticism for having a non combat ptsd claim on a different site, so I'll briefly qualify my circumstances in order to get help. I was stationed in Germany, 1990-1992. During a field exercise, at night, while in uniform, there was a large explosion near my AO at the training area, it was a German civilian transport truck and a small passenger car that had wrecked and caught fire on the nearby autobahn. I along with several other soldiers rushed to the scene and rescued the driver of the truck, and tried unsuccessfully to pull out his passenger before it went up in flames. The passenger didn't make it, and I can't forget the scene and the hopelessness of standing by... Within a few weeks I started experiencing nightmares, anxiety, panic attacks. I was under the naive assumption that PTSD was only for combat veterans until about a year ago, when I was at the VA clinic in my town to see the mental health. The Psch diagnosed me with PTSD non combat, and encouraged me to file a claim. To digress, I was diagnosed bipolar at the VA in 2002 also with a previous history of suicide attempts a year and a half after discharge. I was discharged (ETS) honorably in 1996. First suicide attempt was 18 months after. I have many similar diagnosis of bipolar, one of "reaction psychosis", and a depression diagnosis all through VA and inpatient for bipolar/suicidal ideation. I was awarded SSDI in 2003. Having filled you in, here are my questions- Do these many diagnosis other than PTSD, after discharge, completely negate this new diagnosis of PTSD? Second question, I have had a heck of a time gathering proof of my stressor. So far I've submitted a German newspaper article and two eyewitness buddy statements, as well as two family statements and all my post discharge medical history. I've written to the JSRRC, they claim no record of my Signal Battalion in Germany was ever turned in. My brigade and battalion were inactivated in 2007. I have ran into dead ends in finding unit reports of the incident. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to where to search for S-3 reports or Staff Duty journals, so that I can send the VA further proof of my stressor? Thank you for reading my thread and for your help!
  13. I have been reading some of these blogs on MST and PTSD. I have a C & P exam on 8 July 2015. I have read some that are helpful and I am just a little nervous about this process. For one I am a Male and I disclosed it last year in July 2014. It was the hardest thing I have ever told anyone and was not completely comfortable telling my therapist either, but I had to do something because my mental state was deteriorating fast. I actually pushed the whole incedent out of my mind for along time telling myself it was no big deal. I could not tell anyone because I am a Guy this does not happen to men, so i silently suffered since 1995. I now have an exam. I have been diagnosed with PTSD due to MST and depression. I suffer from sleep distubances and night sweats. My wife tells me I scream in my sleep. I have gone to a couple MST groups and found them to be helpful. I still don't like to talk about it because I am supposed to be strong, but I have so much shame and guilt from it. I have constant anxiey and have panic attacks. I just worry about it and any guidence would be helpful.....
  14. Hello Hadit Helpers, I feel like I am stumbling around blind. I hope someone can help me see. I was service connected in 2011 severe anxiety due to mst and a bladder condition. I have not had gainful employment since ETSing in 2004. I was re-evaluated for an increase and received an overall 70 - 40 -10 but started being payed at 80% in 2016. In June of 2019 I applied for TDIU. I hit the make a decision now button on ebenefits, which was like shooting my own foot for lack of patience, not realizing that this meant the VA could not request any further info from me. In August I was denied, and obtained an attorney. The attorney took over and ebenefits is showing the privacy act starting on October 4th and my claim is now in the evidence gathering/decision making process. Estimated end date of April 2020, the attorney says 3 years, but I know there are new systems in place to make things move a little quicker. I am looking for any information that you all would have about what is actually happening. I don't know if this is a NOD or what. My case manager acts like I am a major pain and won't give me any info and I fear she has no idea what she is actually doing. =( I assume it is not an actual appeal yet, because my case manager said they would have to wait for my c-file before they would appeal on the next denial from the VA. I am so confused, If any of you experts could find the time to help me I would greatly appreciate it. I have always dealt with the VA on my own with no previous denials, but never fully understood what I was doing. I thought hiring an attorney would change this, but I still feel just as blind as before.
  15. I met with a VSO on Feb 8th 2019 and started my MST/PTSD claim. To be totally honest I am scared to death. The incidents happened during my Navy duty 88-89. I had hid it from everyone including my wife until this past December. I had went to a VSO to talk about other claims when it slipped out and I was offered help to form a claim. We filed an intent to claim in Dec 2018. She suggested I talk with my wife and make an appointment with my doctor. After sitting and having a very emotional talk with my wife and with her support I made an appointment with my personal doctor. I am very lucky to have a great doctor who sat with me and after many tears I was able to explain in detail what had happened. He diagnosed me with extreme anxiety mostly when dealing with other Males ( Authority Figures or when confronted), and PTSD/MST and prescribed an anxiety as needed. What we submitted: A two page statement from me ( Timeline form) A statement from my wife A statement from from my 20 yr old son detailing my issues with examples of my issues with male authority figures A Nexus statement from my Doctor saying he feels that my anxiety and PTSD is definitely caused by what happened while I served. The VSO said that it was the best written Nexus statement she has ever seen in her 10 years in doing Veteran claims. My Questions: After submitting a claim to the VSO how long before it shows up on ebenefits? Mine still shows as intent to file. The VSO says it has been submitted. What can I expect at my C & P exam? How can I prepare myself for the exam? This is what I dread/fear most. Is it ok if I post my journey? I also want to thank all the men and women who have submitted to the MST forum. I now know I am not alone. Being a male and reading that similar things has happened to other males and reading their journeys has prepared me to start my journey and start the healing process.
  16. My heart goes out to all of my fellow survivors of MST ... For me, I have found I can no longer suppress and manage the daily physical and emotional affects of the sexual assault that took place on December 25, 1985 while serving on active duty. In effort to find some help, relief and hopefully someday healing I am starting the uphill journey to deal with this and try to share some of the highlights of my battle. I will be the first to admit I have no idea what I am doing and can only hope that God the father.... will guide my feet day by day. First step locating documentation of the event. A few weeks ago I was able to locate the police dept. and requested a copy of the report. I received a copy of the 15 page report this past week and it makes me emotionally and physically sick just to look at the envelope it's in. I also tried to locate medical records over the years from prior mental health therapists and physicians that would have documented my history as it related to these events, but the practices were closed or my records were no longer available due to time. April I called the VA to inquire about mental health services for MST and hesitated to start the process because the MST would not be marked in my record for all my providers to see. This was a big hurdle mentally as I have always hid this event at all costs from my providers. I am sure this did not help my physicians treat me and fully understand my ongoing medical problems especially those in which are usually brought on by some big life event which I always adamantly denied when asked. May 2nd 2017, I submitted a "intent to file". May 4th 2017, I went to a VSO rep?? to asked questions about the process to file a claim related to MST. The rep was belittling, insulting, hurtful, rude and I walked out of that office with no more information and the psychological affects were pretty devastating. At the encouragement from my daughter to go straight to the patient advocate office and file a complaint....I did just that. I found myself have a total mental breakdown just trying to give the details of what just went down and was thankfully met with support and many reassurances that I would have a team of people helping moving forward and that person would be brought in...dealt with and re-trained. I will spare you all the details. My next step is hearing from the mental health dept. to set up an appt. to do some type of baseline evaluation of my symptoms etc. as it related to MST... I guess to get an official diagnosis on record and to get me the specific therapy I need started. I will likely opt for tele-therapy once I have a few sessions onsite at the VA. That's it for now
  17. Dear HadIt.Com; My daughter graduated from University of Maryland before she knew I was eligible for Chapter 35 benefits. She finished school in 2001. I wasn't awarded my Ch. 35 benefits until 2001/2002. She still owes substantial student loans that could be paid-down with the benefits if awarded. Can anyone tell me if she has a leg to stand on if she pursues the appeal process under these circumstances; "Please offer any, and all, help!" I have come across the following BVA decision which granted a claimant benefits after her graduation: Citation Nr: 0514702 Decision Date: 05/31/05 Archive Date: 06/08/05 DOCKET NO. 04 03-295A ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Buffalo, New York THE ISSUE Entitlement to an award of Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) under Chapter 35, Title 38, of the United States Code, for a period of enrollment at Concordia University beginning in September 1999. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD S. A. Mishalanie, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service from January 1967 to August 1969. The appellant is his daughter. This case comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) from a December 2002 decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Buffalo, New York, which granted the appellant's claim for DEA benefits for the Bachelor of Fine Arts program at Concordia University and assigned an effective date of July 29, 2002. She appealed for an earlier effective date. Subsequently, in February 2003, the RO assigned an effective date of September 5, 2000. She continued to appeal, seeking DEA benefits from September 1999. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The appellant is the veteran's daughter. 2. In September 2002, the RO notified the veteran that he had been granted a permanent and total disability evaluation, retroactively effective from July 1999. 3. The RO's grant established the appellant's basic eligibility for DEA benefits, also retroactively effective from July 1999. 4. In September 2002, the appellant filed an application for DEA benefits. In December 2002, the RO received an Enrollment Certification establishing that she pursued a Bachelor of Fine Arts Degree at Concordia University in Quebec, Canada, from September 1999 to May 2002. 5. In July 2003, VA informed the veteran that the Bachelor of Fine Arts program at Concordia University had been approved for receipt of DEA benefits. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria are met for DEA benefits under the provisions of Chapter 35, Title 38, of the United States Code, for a period of enrollment at Concordia University beginning in September 1999. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 3501(a)(1), 3510, 5113 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 21.3021(a)(1) (2004). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION Veterans Claims Assistance Act (VCAA) The VCAA, codified at 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5100, 5102, 5103A, 5106, 5107, 5126 (West 2002), became effective on November 9, 2000. Implementing regulations were created, codified at 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.156(a), 3.159 and 3.326 (2004). The VCAA and implementing regulations eliminated the requirement of submitting a well-grounded claim, and provide that VA will assist a claimant in obtaining evidence necessary to substantiate a claim, but is not required to provide assistance to a claimant if there is no reasonable possibility that such assistance would aid in substantiating the claim. The VCAA and implementing regulations also require VA to notify the claimant and the claimant's representative of any information, and any medical or lay evidence, not previously provided to the Secretary that is necessary to substantiate the claim. As part of the notice, VA is to specifically inform the claimant and the claimant's representative of which portion of the evidence is to be provided by the claimant and which part, if any, VA will attempt to obtain on behalf of the claimant. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103(a) (West 2002); Charles v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 370, 373-74 (2002); Quartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 183, 186- 87 (2002). Since the Board is granting the appellant's claim, in full, there is no need to discuss whether there has been compliance with the VCAA because, even if there has not been, it is merely inconsequential. Cf. Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993). Factual Background In September 2002, the RO notified the veteran that it had granted his claim for a permanent and total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU), retroactively effective from July 1999. The letter also notified him that DEA eligibility was also established from July 1999. A few weeks later, in September 2002, the appellant filed a claim for DEA benefits for courses taken at Concordia University located in Quebec, Canada. In December 2002, she submitted an Enrollment Certificate (VA Form 21-1999), confirming her attendance in the Bachelor of Fine Arts Program at Concordia University from September 1999 through May 2002. An e-mail in the claims file from Education Services to the RO indicates the approval date for the Bachelor of Fine Arts Program at Concordia University had been changed to July 29, 2000. The email states, "the foreign approval guys weren't willing to go back further than that but this should help." A handwritten note on the email indicates that an award date of September 2000 was chosen for the appellant by the RO. The July 2003 statement of the case (SOC) indicates an approval request for the Bachelors of Fine Arts program at Concordia College was received on July 29, 2002. Therefore, the RO reasoned that DEA benefits were not payable before July 29, 2001, one year prior to the date of receipt of the approval request. See 38 C.F.R. § 21.4131(d)(iv) (2004). The RO further noted that the effective date of July 29, 2000 for course approval was erroneously assigned and, therefore, the appellant had erroneously received DEA benefits from September 2000 through May 2001. The RO stated, however, that those benefits would not have to be repaid since they were paid due to an administrative error on the part of VA. Governing Statutes and Regulations A child of a person who has a total disability permanent in nature resulting from a service-connected disability, or who died while a disability so evaluated was in existence is eligible for DEA benefits. 38 U.S.C.A. § 3501(a)(1) ( West 2002). With some limited exceptions, an eligible person is not entitled to an award of DEA benefits until she is 18 years old or completes secondary schooling, whichever occurs first. 38 U.S.C.A. 3511(a) (West 2002). Effective November 1, 2000, Congress amended the law governing, in pertinent part, effective dates for awards of DEA benefits. See Veterans Benefits and Health Care Improvement Act of 2000 (Act) Pub. L. No. 106-419, §113, 114 Stat. 1832 (2000) (codified at 38 U.S.C.A. § 5113 (West 2002)). Section 5113 applies to initial applications that are received on or after the date of enactment of the amendment, or which are pending with the Secretary of VA at that time. In this case, the appellant's application was received after the date of enactment, so this law applies to this appeal. See VAOGCPREC 7-2003 (Nov. 19, 2003). The law provides that, when determining the effective date of an award under Chapter 35 based on an original claim, the Secretary may consider the eligible individual's application as having been filed on the eligibility date of the individual if the eligibility date is more than one year before the date of the initial rating decision. 38 C.F.R. § 5113(B)(1) (West 2002). An individual is eligible if she submits to the Secretary an original application for educational assistance under Chapter 35 of this title within a year of the date that the Secretary makes the rating decision, claims such educational assistance for pursuit of an approved program of education during a period preceding the one-year period ending on the date on which the application was received, and would have been entitled to such assistance if the application had been submitted on the individual's eligibility date. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5113(:D(2) (West 2002). When, after considering all information and evidence of record, there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence as to any material issue, VA shall give the claimant the benefit of the doubt. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107( (West 2002). See also Dela Cruz v. Principi, 15 Vet. App. 143, 148-49 (2001) ("the VCAA simply restated what existed in section 5107 regarding the benefit-of-the-doubt doctrine"). Legal Analysis The appellant had already turned 18, completed her secondary schooling, and was enrolled in the Bachelor of Fine Arts program at Concordia University at the time the veteran's TDIU became effective in July 1999. So she first became eligible for receipt of DEA benefits in July 1999. 38 U.S.C.A. § 3501(a)(1)(A)(ii) (West 2002), 38 C.F.R. § 21.3041((2)(ii) (2004) (If the effective date of the permanent and total disability rating occurs after the child has reached 18, but before he or she has reached 26, the beginning date of eligibility will be the effective date of the rating or the date of notification to the veteran from who the child derives eligibility, whichever is more advantageous to the eligible child). Obviously, however, she was unaware that she was eligible for DEA benefits until the RO made its decision regarding her father's claim for a TDIU and notified him in September 2002. Within a matter of weeks after learning she was eligible, she filed her claim for DEA benefits. Before § 5113 was amended, the law only allowed an award of DEA benefits dating back one year prior to when the appellant filed her claim - which in this case would have been September 2001. This situation is one of the precise reasons Congress amended § 5113 - to correct an inherent unfairness that results when a claimant does not learn of her eligibility for DEA benefits until years later due to the administrative delay in processing the claim. Indeed, it was not her fault it took VA over 3 years to adjudicate and notify her father that he had been granted a permanent and total disability rating. So, as long as she meets all the requirements of the amended version of § 5113, she is entitled to an effective date for an award of DEA benefits that corresponds with her eligibility date. As explained further below, the Board finds that she does in fact meet all the requirements under § 5113. The appellant submitted her original application for DEA benefits within a year after the RO made its rating decision. In fact, she filed her application within a matter of weeks after her father was notified of DEA eligibility. The claim was for an approved program of education during a period preceding the one-year period ending on the date on which the application was received - meaning prior to September 2001. And finally, she would have been entitled to DEA benefits had she submitted such an application on her eligibility date (i.e., in July 1999). See 38 U.S.C.A. § 5113 (West 2002). The Board notes that the RO, in its SOC, reasoned that because the Bachelor of Fine Arts program at Concordia University was not an approved program at the time the appellant became eligible for DEA benefits, she was not entitled to an effective date any earlier than the date course approval was requested. According to a July 2003 letter from the Director of Education Service to the veteran, programs of education at Concordia University were approved on a case-by-case basis - meaning approval was sought for each student separately. Concordia University had sought approval from VA for the Bachelor of Fine Arts program on behalf of another student in July 2002 and was granted such approval. In other words, the appellant was not in pursuit of an approved program of education prior to July 2002, because the Bachelor of Fine Arts program at Concordia University had not yet been approved in accordance with 38 C.F.R. § 21.4260 (2004). But such an interpretation of § 5113 thwarts the legislative intent behind the amendments to this statute and creates a catch-22 for eligible persons. Essentially, this interpretation would require an eligible child who had attended courses at a foreign university to have the ability to travel back in time and request course approval before she even knew she was eligible to receive DEA benefits. The Board disagrees with this interpretation. While it is true that Concordia University is a foreign institution requiring VA approval under 38 C.F.R. § 21.4260 for DEA benefits, it is clear this approval has been granted by VA for the Bachelor of Fine Arts program. And presumably if the appellant had filed her application and her request for course approval on her eligibility date, this program at Concordia University would have been approved at that time. The Board finds no reason to doubt otherwise. Given the foregoing, the Board concludes that the appellant is entitled to an award of DEA benefits under the provisions of Chapter 35, Title 38, United States Code for a period of enrollment at Concordia University beginning in September 1999. ORDER The claim for an award of DEA benefits under the provisions of Chapter 35, Title 38, of the United States Code, for a period of enrollment beginning on September 7, 1999 at Concordia University, is granted, subject to statutory and regulatory provisions governing the payment of monetary benefits. ____________________________________________ Keith W. Allen Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs ______________________________________________________________________________ Thank you, in advance for anyone out there with information that can help. ***"Sonny" E. T. English - Vietnam Veteran"***
  18. Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 9:33 AM Subject: FW: Guam AO Award VA Appeals Court Agent Orange win for people who were on Guam. Pass along to anyone fighting VA for Guam benefits http://www.countyofkings.com/vetserve/Vete...0on%20Guam.html Citation Nr: 0527748 Decision Date: 10/13/05 Archive Date: 10/25/05 DOCKET NO. 02-11 819 ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Boston, Massachusetts THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus secondary to herbicide exposure. REPRESENTATION Veteran represented by: Massachusetts Department of Veterans Services WITNESSES AT HEARING ON APPEAL The veteran and his brother ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD L. J. N. Driever, Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service from December 1966 to December 1970, including in Guam from December 1966 to October 1968. This claim comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a March 2002 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Boston, Massachusetts. The veteran and his brother testified in support of this claim at a hearing held at the RO before the undersigned in May 2004. In September 2004, the Board remanded this claim to the RO via the Appeals Management Center in Washington, D.C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. VA provided the veteran adequate notice and assistance with regard to his claim. 2. Diabetes mellitus is related to the veteran's active service. CONCLUSION OF LAW Diabetes mellitus was incurred in service. 38 U.S.C.A. 1110, 5102, 5103, 5103A (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. ?? 3.159, 3.303 (2004). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION VA's Duties to Notify and Assist On November 9, 2000, the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA), codified at 38 U.S.C.A. ?? 5100, 5102, 5103, 5103A, 5106, 5107, 5126 (West 2002), became law. Regulations implementing the VCAA were published at 66 Fed. Reg. 45,620, 45,630-32 (August 29, 2001) and codified at 38 C.F.R. ?? 3.102, 3.156(a), 3.159 and 3.326 (2004). The VCAA and its implementing regulations are applicable to this appeal. The VCAA and its implementing regulations provide that VA will assist a claimant in obtaining evidence necessary to substantiate a claim but is not required to provide assistance to a claimant if there is no reasonable possibility that such assistance would aid in substantiating the claim. They also require VA to notify the claimant and the claimant's representative, if any, of the information and medical or lay evidence not previously provided to the Secretary that is necessary to substantiate the claim. As part of the notice, VA is to specifically inform the claimant and the claimant's representative, if any, of which portion of the evidence is to be provided by the claimant and which portion of the evidence VA will attempt to obtain on behalf of the claimant. The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) has mandated that VA ensure strict compliance with the provisions of the VCAA. See Quartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 183 (2002). In this case, VA has strictly complied with the VCAA by providing the veteran adequate notice and assistance with regard to his claim. Regardless, given that the decision explained below represents a full grant of the benefit being sought on appeal, the Board's decision to proceed in adjudicating this claim does not prejudice the veteran in the disposition thereof. See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384, 392-94 (1993). Analysis of Claim In multiple written statements submitted during the course of this appeal and during his personal hearing, the veteran alleged that he developed diabetes mellitus as a result of his exposure to herbicide agents while serving on active duty in Guam. His military occupational duties as an aircraft maintenance specialist allegedly required him to work in an air field, the perimeter of which was continuously brown due to herbicide spraying every three months. The veteran also alleges that he recalls seeing storage barrels at the edge of the base, which he now knows housed herbicides. Following discharge, Anderson Air Force base in Guam, where the veteran was stationed, underwent an environmental study, which showed a significant amount of dioxin contamination in the soil and prompted the federal government to order a clean up of the site. Service connection may be granted for disability resulting from disease or injury incurred in or aggravated by service. 38 U.S.C.A. ? 1110 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. ? 3.303 (2004). Service connection may also be granted for any disease diagnosed after discharge when all of the evidence, including that pertinent to service, establishes that the disease was incurred in service. 38 C.F.R. ? 3.303(d). Subsequent manifestations of a chronic disease in service, however remote, are to be service connected, unless clearly attributable to intercurrent causes. For the showing of chronic disease in service there is required a combination of manifestations sufficient to identify the disease entity, and sufficient observation to establish chronicity at the time, as distinguished from merely isolated findings or diagnosis including the word "chronic." Continuity of symptomatology is required only where the condition noted during service is not, in fact, shown to be chronic or when the diagnosis of chronicity may be legitimately questioned. When the fact of chronicity in service is not adequately supported, then a showing of continuity after discharge is required to support the claim. 38 C.F.R. ? 3.303(b). In some circumstances, a disease associated with exposure to certain herbicide agents will be presumed to have been incurred in service even though there is no evidence of that disease during the period of service at issue. 38 U.S.C.A. ? 1116(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. ?? 3.307(a)(6), 3.309(e) (2004). In this regard, a veteran who, during active military, naval, or air service, served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam era shall be presumed to have been exposed during such service to a herbicide agent, unless there is affirmative evidence to establish that the veteran was not exposed to any such agent during that service. 38 U.S.C.A. ? 1116(a)(3). Diseases associated with such exposure include: chloracne or other acneform diseases consistent with chloracne; Type 2 diabetes (also known as Type II diabetes mellitus or adult-onset diabetes); Hodgkin's disease; multiple myeloma; non- Hodgkin's lymphoma; acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy; porphyria cutanea tarda; prostate cancer; respiratory cancers (cancer of the lung, bronchus, larynx, or trachea); and soft- tissue sarcomas (other than osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, or mesothelioma). 38 C.F.R. ? 3.309(e) (2004); see also 38 U.S.C.A. ? 1116(f), as added by ? 201© of the Veterans Education and Benefits Expansion Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-103, 115 Stat. 976 (2001). These diseases shall have become manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more at any time after service, except that chloracne or other acneform disease consistent with chloracne, porphyria cutanea tarda, and acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy shall have become manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more within a year after the last date on which the veteran was exposed to an herbicide agent during active military, naval, or air service. 38 C.F.R. ? 3.307(a)(6)(ii). The last date on which such a veteran shall be presumed to have been exposed to an herbicide agent shall be the last date on which he or she served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam era. "Service in the Republic of Vietnam" includes service in the waters offshore and service in other locations if the conditions of service involved duty or visitation in the Republic of Vietnam. 38 C.F.R. ? 3.307(a)(6)(iii). The Secretary of Veterans Affairs has determined that there is no positive association between exposure to herbicides and any other condition for which the Secretary has not specifically determined that a presumption of service connection is warranted. See Notice, 59 Fed. Reg. 341, 346 (1994); see also 61 Fed. Reg. 41,442, 41,449 and 57,586, 57,589 (1996); 67 Fed. Reg. 42,600, 42,608 (2002). Notwithstanding the aforementioned provisions relating to presumptive service connection, which arose out of the Veteran's Dioxin and Radiation Exposure Compensation Standards Act, Pub. L. No. 98-542, ? 5, 98 Stat. 2,725, 2,727-29 (1984), and the Agent Orange Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-4, ? 2, 105 Stat. 11 (1991), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has determined that a claimant is not precluded from establishing service connection with proof of direct causation. Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1042 (Fed. Cir. 1994); see also 38 C.F.R. ? 3.303(d). In order to prevail with regard to the issue of service connection on the merits, "there must be medical evidence of a current disability, see Rabideau v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 141, 143 (1992); medical or, in certain circumstances, lay evidence of in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury; and medical evidence of a nexus between the claimed in-service disease or injury and the present disease or injury. See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996). Except as otherwise provided by law, a claimant has the responsibility to present and support a claim for benefits under laws administered by the Secretary. The Secretary shall consider all information and lay and medical evidence of record in a case before the Secretary with respect to benefits under laws administered by the Secretary. When there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding any issue material to the determination of a matter, the Secretary shall give the benefit of the doubt to the claimant. 38 U.S.C.A. ? 5107 (West 2002); see also Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49, 53 (1990). The veteran's service medical records reflect that, during service, the veteran did not report herbicide exposure. In addition, he did not receive treatment for and was not diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. His DD Form 214, DD Form 7 and Airmen Performance Reports dated in March 1968 and October 1968, however, confirm that he had active service from December 1966 to December 1970, including at Anderson Air Force base in Guam from December 1966 to October 1968. He has submitted copies of articles indicating that Agent Orange may have been stored and/or used on Guam from 1955 to the late 1960s, which is the time period during which the veteran served there. These articles also reflect that in the 1990s, the Environmental Protection Agency listed Anderson Air Force base as a toxic site with dioxin contaminated soil and ordered clean up of the site. Given this evidence, particularly, the articles reflecting the latter information, and the veteran's testimony, which is credible, the Board accepts that the veteran was exposed to herbicides during his active service in Guam. The veteran did not serve in Vietnam; therefore, he is not entitled to a presumption of service connection for his diabetes mellitus under the aforementioned law and regulations governing claims for service connection for disabilities resulting from herbicide exposure. As previously indicated, however, the veteran may be entitled to service connection for this disease on a direct basis if the evidence establishes that his diabetes mellitus is related to the herbicide exposure. Post-service medical evidence indicates that, since 1993, the veteran has received treatment for, and been diagnosed with, diabetes mellitus. One medical professional has addressed the question of whether this disease is related to such exposure. In June 2005, a VA examiner noted that the veteran had had the disease for 12 years, had no parental history of such a disease, and had served in Guam, primarily in an air field, which was often sprayed with chemicals. She diagnosed diabetes type 2 and opined that this disease was 50 to 100 percent more likely than not due to the veteran's exposure to herbicides between January 1968 and April 1970, when he served as a crew chief for the 99th bomb wing on the ground and tarmac. She explained that such exposure, rather than hereditary factors, better explained the cause of the disease given that the veteran's parents did not have diabetes. As the record stands, there is no competent medical evidence of record disassociating the veteran's diabetes mellitus from his in-service herbicide exposure or otherwise from his active service. Relying primarily on the VA examiner's opinion, the Board thus finds that diabetes mellitus is related to the veteran's service. Based on this finding, the Board concludes that diabetes mellitus was incurred in service. Inasmuch as the evidence supports the veteran's claim, that claim must be granted. ORDER Service connection for diabetes mellitus secondary to herbicide exposure is granted. "Keep on, Keepin' on" Dan Cedusky, Champaign IL "Colonel Dan" See my web site at: http://www.angelfire.com/il2/VeteranIssues/
  19. I recently did a new C&P for PTSD when I filed for I.U. He neglected to mark a lot of my symptoms. I am currently rated at 50% PTSD, was wondering if you think this keeps me a the same or warrants an increase. He did forget to mark my suicidal ideations and a few other symptoms though so I am worried I won't be rated correctly. Is this DBQ being completed in conjunction with a VA 21-2507, C&P Examination Request? [X] Yes [ ] No SECTION I: ---------- 1. Diagnostic Summary --------------------- Does the Veteran now have or has he/she ever been diagnosed with PTSD? [X] Yes [ ] No ICD Code: F43.10 2. Current Diagnoses -------------------- a. Mental Disorder Diagnosis #1: PTSD ICD Code: F43.10 Mental Disorder Diagnosis #2: Panic Disorder ICD Code: F41.0 Mental Disorder Diagnosis #3: Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent ICD Code: F33.1 Mental Disorder Diagnosis #4: No Axis II disorder b. Medical diagnoses relevant to the understanding or management of the Mental Health Disorder (to include TBI): No response provided. 3. Differentiation of symptoms ------------------------------ a. Does the Veteran have more than one mental disorder diagnosed? [X] Yes [ ] No b. Is it possible to differentiate what symptom(s) is/are attributable to each diagnosis? [ ] Yes [X] No [ ] Not applicable (N/A) If no, provide reason that it is not possible to differentiate what portion of each symptom is attributable to each diagnosis and discuss whether there is any clinical association between these diagnoses: The PTSD is currently the more severe and responsible for the veteran's current level of impairment; the clinical depression and the Panic Disorder are certainly significant, however. The depression and Panic Disorder are seen as more likely than not caused by the chronic PTSD symptoms. It is difficult to ferret out the contribution of the three disorders due to the overlap of symptoms and variability of degree; at times any of the three disorders may be the more severe, but the PTSD is responsible for the current level of impairment. c. Does the Veteran have a diagnosed traumatic brain injury (TBI)? [ ] Yes [ ] No [X] Not shown in records reviewed 4. Occupational and social impairment ------------------------------------- a. Which of the following best summarizes the Veteran's level of occupational and social impairment with regards to all mental diagnoses? (Check only one) [X] Occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity b. For the indicated level of occupational and social impairment, is it possible to differentiate what portion of the occupational and social impairment indicated above is caused by each mental disorder? [ ] Yes [X] No [ ] No other mental disorder has been diagnosed If no, provide reason that it is not possible to differentiate what portion of the indicated level of occupational and social impairment is attributable to each diagnosis: The PTSD is currently the more severe and responsible for the veteran's current level of impairment; the clinical depression and the Panic Disorder are certainly significant, however. The depression and Panic Disorder are seen as more likely than not caused by the chronic PTSD symptoms. It is difficult to ferret out the contribution of the three disorders due to the overlap of symptoms and variability of degree; at times any of the three disorders may be the more severe, but the PTSD is responsible for the current level of impairment. c. If a diagnosis of TBI exists, is it possible to differentiate what portion of the occupational and social impairment indicated above is caused by the TBI? [ ] Yes [ ] No [X] No diagnosis of TBI SECTION II: ----------- Clinical Findings: ------------------ 1. Evidence Review ------------------ Evidence reviewed (check all that apply): [X] VA e-folder (VBMS or Virtual VA) [X] CPRS 2. Recent History (since prior exam) ------------------------------------ a. Relevant Social/Marital/Family history: Veteran received his previous PTSD C&P on Mar 2016. At that time he was living in an aparments. He still lives in but has moved to a different aprtment. He lives with a roommate. He is not in a relationship. The veteran is not employed. His typical day consists of going to school, "I have classes five days a week but "I only go two days a week because of panic attacks. When I'm home I sometimes lay in bed and cry or think about everything." He noted he does not sleep much at all. He said he only gets out for school; is roommate will cook and get most of the groceries. b. Relevant Occupational and Educational history: The veteran has not worked since he was discharged from the Air Force in 2016. He has applied for jobs and tried to do a work study but quit because of panic attacks; at times he will scream and hit his back pack. He started there in August and is taking 12 units. He is schedule to attend classes five days a week but rarely makes all five days. "I'm close to failing a couple of classes for attendance. c. Relevant Mental Health history, to include prescribed medications and family mental health: The veteran is current being followed by a staff psychologist every two weeks; he has being seeing her since August. He is also followed by a staff psychiatrist who prescribes: prazosin and Celexa. He has taken other medications. He said they help only a little bit. d. Relevant Legal and Behavioral history: Denied by the veteran. He did say he got into an altercation about two weeks ago at the gym when he through a dumbbell at the floor; he was kicked out. e. Relevant Substance abuse history: The veteran has not drank alcohol for over one years; he denied ever abusing it. He does not use illegal substances. f. Other, if any: No response provided. 3. PTSD Diagnostic Criteria --------------------------- Please check criteria used for establishing the current PTSD diagnosis. The diagnostic criteria for PTSD, are from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5). The stressful event can be due to combat, personal trauma, other life threatening situations (non-combat related stressors). Do NOT mark symptom s below that are clearly not attributable to the Criterion A stressor/PTSD. Instead, overlapping symptoms clearly attributable to other things should be noted under #6 - "Other symptoms". Criterion A: Exposure to actual or threatened a) death, b) serious injury, c) sexual violence, in one or more of the following ways: [X] Directly experiencing the traumatic event(s) Criterion B: Presence of (one or more) of the following intrusion symptoms associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning after the traumatic event(s) occurred: [X] Recurrent, involuntary, and intrusive distressing memories of the traumatic event(s). [X] Recurrent distressing dreams in which the content and/or affect of the dream are related to the traumatic event(s). [X] Intense or prolonged psychological distress at exposure to internal or external cues that symbolize or resemble an aspect of the traumatic event(s). Criterion C: Persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning after the traumatic events(s) occurred, as evidenced by one or both of the following: [X] Avoidance of or efforts to avoid distressing memories, thoughts, or feelings about or closely associated with the traumatic event(s). [X] Avoidance of or efforts to avoid external reminders (people, places, conversations, activities, objects, situations) that arouse distressing memories, thoughts, or feelings about or closely associated with the traumatic event(s). Criterion D: Negative alterations in cognitions and mood associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning or worsening after the traumatic event(s) occurred, as evidenced by two (or more) of the following: [X] Persistent, distorted cognitions about the cause or consequences of the traumatic event(s) that lead the individual to blame himself/herself or others. [X] Markedly diminished interest or participation in significant activities. [X] Feelings of detachment or estrangement from others. Criterion E: Marked alterations in arousal and reactivity associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning or worsening after the traumatic event(s) occurred, as evidenced by two (or more) of the following: [X] Irritable behavior and angry outbursts (with little or no provocation) typically expressed as verbal or physical aggression toward people or objects. [X] Problems with concentration. [X] Sleep disturbance (e.g., difficulty falling or staying asleep or restless sleep). Criterion F: [X] The duration of the symptoms described above in Criteria B, C, and D are more than 1 month. Criterion G: [X] The PTSD symptoms described above cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. Criterion H: [X] The disturbance is not attributable to the physiological effects of a substance (e.g., medication, alcohol) or another medical condition. 4. Symptoms ----------- For VA rating purposes, check all symptoms that actively apply to the Veteran's diagnoses: [X] Depressed mood [X] Anxiety [X] Panic attacks more than once a week [X] Mild memory loss, such as forgetting names, directions or recent events [X] Disturbances of motivation and mood [X] Difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships [X] Difficulty in adapting to stressful circumstances, including work or a worklike setting [X] Neglect of personal appearance and hygiene 5. Behavioral observations -------------------------- No unusual behaviors observed. 6. Other symptoms ----------------- Does the Veteran have any other symptoms attributable to PTSD (and other mental disorders) that are not listed above? [X] Yes [ ] No If yes, describe: The veteran reports having suicidal thoughts 3-4 times a week but doesn't dwell on them. He said he would never attempt suicided because of his kids. 7. Competency ------------- Is the Veteran capable of managing his or her financial affairs? [X] Yes [ ] No 8. Remarks, (including any testing results) if any: --------------------------------------------------- No remarks provided.
  20. Looking for some guidance. I served on active duty in the Navy from 87-90 overseas on a ship. My original plans when I enrolled was to do 20 years, Back in Dec of 2018 I met with and amazing Veterans Service Officer about a tinnitus claim which was approved. While there she had handed me a bunch papers about claims and one was on PTSD and MST. She was copying and I was reading the PTSD-MST document and it triggered a bunch of emotions where I started shacking and tearing up. The VSO walked in and noticed my state and asked me if I was ok. I tried to answer her but, couldn't she went and got a male VSO and a male nurse to come in. Once the nurse helped calmed me down the male VSO noticed the document I was reading and we talked for awhile about it and I briefly explained a little. He recommend that I file a DBA for PTSD-MST and recommended the following. I document everything I can remember about the events is causing my stressors: I wrote an eight page document in details about the events. Talk to my wife about what happened and have her write a document on what she sees and how it effects our relationship: After having an very hard emotional talk with her, she wrote a two page document. My 20 year old son also wrote a two page document on things he as seen, even though he only knows a little about what happened. Talk to my doctor about what happened: Made an appointment and discussed detail what happened and he diagnosed me with severe PTSD and anxiety placed on Xanax as needed. He wrote a Nexus letter and has sent it into the VA for me Now I explain a little about what when on when arriving on ship I was assigned to a steam generator room and assigned watch with two other sailors one was a 2nd Class Petty officer and the other a 3rd class. At the time we were doing 12 hour watches 12 on 12 off. The first few watches went well. We were getting ready to pull into Subic Bay Philippines for a few days before heading back to Japan. They both stated " We want you to come out and drink with us and then we can tag team a few girls". Now a little history alcoholism runs in my family and I don'y shy away from drinking I just know my limits. When we arrived in port I hung out with a few of my buddies instead. When we headed back to sea things went down hill. On my first watch back with them they yelled to me to come to the watch booth which was big enough for 2 chairs and a small table/chair between them the whole booth was maybe 4 feet by 6 feet with a center door and windows. When I went in I noticed they both had towels over their laps which wasn't unusual do to it being over 100 degrees in there. I was told to sit down and did then one of them stated we figured out why you didn't go out with use you must be gay and not like girls. I didn't get a chance to answer when they ripped the towels off and exposed themselves to me. I tried to leave but they held the door laughing. I was finally let out and was very shaken up. This happened many time the next few day the both continually exposed themselves to me. I would ask them to stop and would be ignored. I went to my Chief Petty officer and told him what was going and and got this remark back " Why you trying to get them in trouble they are just playing with you". I went to back to my watch and was cornered by them and verbally threatened to keep my mouth shut. With out going in two many details things escalated to the point where I wold come done to watch and they would be masturbating in the open I'd try to move away and they would chase me around. One time I was working in the bilge( bottom area of ship lots of stinky water and valves) under the floor of our work space crawling around attempting to fix a valve when I felt what I thought was water coming down on me upon looking up realized they were urinating on me. A lot more worse things happened. I was very depressed and felt helpless. I tho ought about suicide many time and even cut my wrist once when things were at its worst. Got scared and told everyone I fell and sliced it still have the scar. Other than my failed attempt to tell my Chief about it I never told a soul about it. I ask myself why didn't I fight back? Lets put it this way at the time I weighed about 125 lbs soaking wet and about 5'7". They both were about 170-180 and were both over 6 feet. I was working in a space alone with them at anytime they could injury me say I got hurt working it was my word against the 2 of them. Why has it taking so long for me to open up about this? I always thought that Sexual trauma only happened to woman. I was scared and embarrassed to admit he happened to me. How has this affected me. I have nightmares weekly. I have flashbacks. Something will trigger memories and I'll have panic attacks. I have intimacy issues. I have ED issues that started at an early age. I have issues in places where there may be Male Public Nudity ( Locker rooms, even public restrooms I'll use a stall ) Just because it triggers flashback of them and what they did. I have issues with Male authority figures. I have the tendency to back down from and conflicts even though and right. Fear retaliation And the big one still fear retaliation from them. Still fear after almost 30 years that exposing them and what happened they will find away to get me. Thank you to everyone who reads this. Now my questions: Is there anything else I should include to help my case? I'm aware that after my meeting with the VSO they will set me up with a DBA with someone from the VA. What can I expect from that meeting and how should I prepare for it? What about secondary PTSD symptoms what applies? After meeting with my personal doctor he actually interned at the VA center I going to. He suggested apply for ratings secondary to the PTSD rating for the following. Erectile dysfunction, hypertension. Do you feel that these are ok? Are there others that I should consider or be aware of?
  21. I've been a lurker on here for a little bit, I have been able to find most of my questions answered on here through a quick search, but I'm having trouble finding anything related to my current question. I had a partial grant last month from the BVA; two approvals, one increase, one denial, and two remands. I'm currently waiting on my RO in Muskogee, OK to promulgate my rating. They received my file on February 28th, 2017, and so far nothing has changed in ebenefits, and iris inquiries have left me with more questions than answers. I'm also in an expedited status due to extreme financial hardship. Is a case that's been flagged for hardship treated more expeditiously than a normal BVA grant? I ask because VLJ already stated that it should be treated in an expedited matter because it's an Appeal (everyone is expedited after BVA = no one is expedited, lol). I left a complaint on IRIS to my RO about how that the BVA has the FL 10-02 going over this exact circumstance and that I'm also flagged under hardship status. What else can I do from here? Running out of time...
  22. Hi there! Long time member here but been MIA for awhile. Life has been busy and I have been dealing with health issues. Long story short, I went through a battery of tests to find out what is wrong with me. I did an ANA-TITER test, and it was positive for an auto immune disease. Was referred to the RA doctor for further testing to see if I had lupus. The RA doctor did blood tests and determined I don't have lupus. We did additionally physical exam at the VA back in May and he determined I had Fibromyalgia and diagnosed me with it. We discussed that my Fibromyalgia co-exists with PTSD/MST and IBS. We also discussed that Fibromyalgia can be secondary to my already service-connected PTSD/MST or even maybe my IBS. I discussed this with my representative and we decided to file a claim for Fibromyalgia (non-service connected disability) to an already service-connected disability. Either PTSD/MST or IBS and we asked that they evaluate either causation or aggravation. We filed in July and I had my C&P exam in September. The examiner was asked by the rater to give his medical opinion as to the Fibro being secondary to my PTSD/MST. The rater did not ask if it was possible to be secondary to my IBS like we requested. The examiner did a C&P DBQ for Fibro and that was positive. I do have Fibro, that isn't the issue. The medical opinion is what was disturbing. I was with the examiner for less than 5 minutes. He stated he physically examined me when he did not and he seemed very unknowledgeable about Fibro/PTSD-MST/IBS as co-existing and determining either causation or aggravation. Of course the medical opinion stated, "less likely than not". I was floored, so I went to work for my claim. I contacted my RA doctor and we talked with my representative on the phone as well. By the end of the call he was confident enough to link my PTSD/MST as aggravation to my Fibromyalgia. He wrote a one/two paragraph letter on my behalf. We sent that to the rater. Then I spoke to my MH provider last week and she too wrote me a very good NEXUS letter. That was sent to the rater yesterday. Both my doctor's are at the VA and both stepped out on a limb for me. I am hoping their medical opinions outweigh the negative C&P medical opinion. I am attaching the C&P exams (redacted), the two medical opinions (redacted) - I am hoping I am successful because this will make me 100% scheduler. I am currently 94% overall rated. C&P _Redacted.pdf nexus 2_Redacted.pdf redacted.pdf redacted2.pdf
  23. C&P Exam PTSD:MST Eating Disorder.pdf ^^^^^^Well the attached report indicates to me a 10% PTSD rating. I am currently 30% and I do not understand how this happened but I might be in for a reduction. I thought the exam went well. I had a PTSD and Eating Disorder C&P. Regarding the occupational/social impairment she checked the one that resembles 10% and for "b" she marks YES and goes on to say my trauma impacts my occupational/social impairment. Look at the symptoms she notes: Anxiety; Panic Attacks more than once a week; Chronic sleep impairment; difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships She even stated in the exam that I was BDD (Body Dysmorphic Disorder) but her reports indicates while I have BDD characteristics I don't warrant the BDD rating. She states for the VA established diagnosis of SPECIFIED TRAUMA AND STRESSOR RELATED DISORDER, there is NO CHANGE in the diagnosis. At this time the claimant's condition is active. Does this Exam mean I am going to be reduced or would I fall under the below??? 3.344 Stabilization of disability evaluations. (a) Examination reports indicating improvement. Rating agencies will handle cases affected by change of medical findings or diagnosis, so as to produce the greatest degree of stability of disability evaluations consistent with the laws and Department of Veterans Affairs regulations governing disability compensation and pension. It is essential that the entire record of examinations and the medical-industrial history be reviewed to ascertain whether the recent examination is full and complete, including all special examinations indicated as a result of general examination and the entire case history. This applies to treatment of intercurrent diseases and exacerbations, including hospital reports, bedside examinations, examinations by designated physicians, and examinations in the absence of, or without taking full advantage of, laboratory facilities and the cooperation of specialists in related lines. Examinations less full and complete than those on which payments were authorized or continued will not be used as a basis of reduction. Ratings on account of diseases subject to temporary or episodic improvement, e.g., manic depressive or other psychotic reaction, epilepsy, psychoneurotic reaction, arteriosclerotic heart disease, bronchial asthma, gastric or duodenal ulcer, many skin diseases, etc., will not be reduced on any one examination, except in those instances where all the evidence of record clearly warrants the conclusion that sustained improvement has been demonstrated. Ratings on account of diseases which become comparatively symptom free (findings absent) after prolonged rest, e.g. residuals of phlebitis, arteriosclerotic heart disease, etc., will not be reduced on examinations reflecting the results of bed rest. Moreover, though material improvement in the physical or mental condition is clearly reflected the rating agency will consider whether the evidence makes it reasonably certain that the improvement will be maintained under the ordinary conditions of life. When syphilis of the central nervous system or alcoholic deterioration is diagnosed following a long prior history of psychosis, psychoneurosis, epilepsy, or the like, it is rarely possible to exclude persistence, in masked form, of the preceding innocently acquired manifestations. Rating boards encountering a change of diagnosis will exercise caution in the determination as to whether a change in diagnosis represents no more than a progression of an earlier diagnosis, an error in prior diagnosis or possibly a disease entity independent of the service-connected disability. When the new diagnosis reflects mental deficiency or personality disorder only, the possibility of only temporary remission of a super-imposed psychiatric disease will be borne in mind. (b) Doubtful cases. If doubt remains, after according due consideration to all the evidence developed by the several items discussed in paragraph (a) of this section, the rating agency will continue the rating in effect, citing the former diagnosis with the new diagnosis in parentheses, and following the appropriate code there will be added the reference “Rating continued pending reexamination ___ months from this date, §3.344.” The rating agency will determine on the basis of the facts in each individual case whether 18, 24 or 30 months will be allowed to elapse before the reexamination will be made. (c) Disabilities which are likely to improve. The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section apply to ratings which have continued for long periods at the same level (5 years or more). They do not apply to disabilities which have not become stabilized and are likely to improve. Reexaminations disclosing improvement, physical or mental, in these disabilities will warrant reduction in rating.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines