Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question For Berta Or Anyone?

Rate this question


chief 313

Question

dear berta, granted 100% p&t ptsd and mdd june ist 2007. filed orgional claim may 2006.granted 30%ptsd and mdd sept 06.lowed balled,more like 50%.filed for increase 28 of oct o6.quit working april 06.my pc doctor said unemployable june o6 due to ptsd and mdd. what should correct efective 100% date be?the va says oct 06. or april 06. thanks for all answers.best regards chief313.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

filed orgional claim may 2006

granted 30%ptsd and mdd sept 06.

filed for increase 28 of oct o6.

quit working april 06.my pc doctor said unemployable june o6 due

Was the original Sept 06 decision appealed - you said you filed for an increase in Oct 06. This is hard to understand for the normal course would have been to NOD the Sept 06 decision vs filing for an increase.

If you appealed the Sept 06 rating within the required time limits then it appears the effective date should have been May 06 the date of receipt of the claim.

If you did not appeal and somehow began a new claim????? then the effective date would have been Oct 06

Edited by Ricky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would he need an appeal? Wouldn't a file for increase a month after the Sept 06 decision be an NOD that he disagreed with the rating(which he had one year to file)?

They could go back to the original claim date, in that case.

But their other move would be to set the date of the 100% to the date they decide he actually became 100% disabled..

Free

filed orgional claim may 2006

granted 30%ptsd and mdd sept 06.

filed for increase 28 of oct o6.

quit working april 06.my pc doctor said unemployable june o6 due

Was the original Sept 06 decision appealed - you said you filed for an increase in Oct 06. This is hard to understand for the normal course would have been to NOD the Sept 06 decision vs filing for an increase.

If you appealed the Sept 06 rating within the required time limits then it appears the effective date should have been May 06 the date of receipt of the claim.

If you did not appeal and somehow began a new claim????? then the effective date would have been Oct 06

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"my pc doctor said unemployable june o6 due to ptsd and mdd. what should correct efective 100% date be?the va says oct 06. or april 06. "

I would think April 2006 should be the effective date of TDIU as long as the doctor supported this above statement and it is all documented-as it was your last date of employment-

Did VA give any rationale at all to support the date they gave you?

Also they often give any SSA date of employability if it is solely for the SC condition and can go back one year prior to the claim date.

Example : my husband filed for higher PTSD rating -Oct or Nov- 1992-

SSA awarded for PTSD back to Oct 1991. The posthumous award said 100% SC as of Oct 1991.

They didnt refer to the SSA award in the narrative but quoted his shrink.

Yet it was obvious that this is how they arrived at this date.

When a doc or SSA says you are unemployable -VA and SSA uses the last date of employment in many cases-as the EED.

This is an advantage if the claim date came after any medical evidence of a prior unemployment date.

But they wont go further back than a year.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This comes under a provision in 38 CFR 3.400 which states that new and material evidence received during an appeal period or prior to an appellate decision will permit assignment of a rating as though the former decision had not been rendered. What was the date of the first V.A. examination which granted the increase which was granted September 2006? I know there may be a way to do this as a CUE claim because my husband's DAV rep did this for him based in part on new and material evidence from Social Security. Look at 38 CFR 3.157 (:angry: and 38 CFR 3.400 (q).

dear berta, granted 100% p&t ptsd and mdd june ist 2007. filed orgional claim may 2006.granted 30%ptsd and mdd sept 06.lowed balled,more like 50%.filed for increase 28 of oct o6.quit working april 06.my pc doctor said unemployable june o6 due to ptsd and mdd. what should correct efective 100% date be?the va says oct 06. or april 06. thanks for all answers.best regards chief313.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

chief,If you would have filed a nod and ask that your claim be reconsider from initial date may of 1966,your effective date would have been May of 1966 but i see you filed for increase sept 6 1966, this might be your effective date.I hope that va taken in consideration that your ptsd symptom was condsider unemployable by your private doctor June 1966 and make that your effective date.Congratulation on your award and i wish you GOOD LUCK on effective date.

mobie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use