Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Does Compensation Date Begin At The Onset Of Condition

Rate this question


mountain tyme

Question

I am in one of those rare moods today so I have a question. If the VA doctor determines that the veterans condition is clearly caused by a service connected incident and that the condition was NOT in no way pre existing prior to entering the military and that after military service that there is no incidents that would have caused the condition (va grants s/c). How would the VA determine the date of compensation if the VA doctor states that the condition is chonic and the injury began at the time of the occurace and was not detected at time of discharge because there was no out processing physical or evaluations.

that is my question.

mt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Generally, the effective date of any compensation being paid is the date of the claim, unless the claim is filed within one year after seperation. In this case the effective date will be the date of seperation instead of the date of the claim.

Vike 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vike is correct of course-

in some cases the vet can even squeeze a little more out of them- depends on many factors-

all medical---

If a vet gets SSA for a condition and then the VA awards-sometimes they will use the SSA date as a retro-as they did in my husband's case-

The medical evidence revealed 100% SC a year prior to his date of filing the claim.

Nehmer vets- a different scenario-

I have posted this all before here-

If a Veteran gets an AO condition SCed-and had been denied in the past for the same condition-

and has the disability listed as NSC on a past rating sheet-

depending on the AO disability and date of its reg publication and other factors- the veteran could potentially be eligible for MUCH MORE retro.

When VA defied the Nehmer Court Order and Stipulation, NVLSP found they had snookered millions of dollars in retro from AO veterans and AO widows.

The VA had to cough up the cash.

Again it all depends on the award-the AO disability-other factors-

this info is here and at the NVLSP web site under the Retroactive payments Under Nehmer posts.

There is no time limit to file for addition AO retro on AO disability awards.

Example from Page 630 VBM 2006 edition (NVLSP)

Incountry Vietnam Vet files claim on Jan 1, 1986 for NHL (non Hodgkins lymphoma).

VA denies a few months later.

Vet then files a second claim for NHL in 1992.

VA grants as this is an established AO disability.

The effective date for the retro award is January 1, 1986.

(Once VA makes proper AO death award to me -I have not even considered how this will play into Rods past claims-he showed evidence by medical documentation of DMII due to AO as far back as 1988 and incurred additional disabilities and death due to its complications.Since he had been misdiagnosed he could not claim what he did not know he had.

no wonder NVLSP says they never saw a claim like mine before)

Nehmer and the VCAA are the most important VA decisions in my lifetime.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use