Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Twist

Rate this question


JayBrown1

Question

Received an IRIS today on my claim and gave me a new twist to my neverending saga at the VA. It stated "Congressional Inquiries usually require a written by the Director. Your file was ready to make the rating decision, but had to be pulled for the congressional response. The management analyst indicated that the file has been sent back to the rating team so the claim process may be continue."

Why would they pull it just before making a decision besides delaying a decision on my claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Congressional inquiries typically require immediate responses regarding the status of an individual claim and I wouldn't think that it delayed the processing of your claim any unless you receive your decision right away. My claim has been sitting with the rating board since April and I haven't heard a peep yet, and I can't say as that I am surprised since I am not a Global War on Terror veteran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congressional inquiries typically require immediate responses regarding the status of an individual claim and I wouldn't think that it delayed the processing of your claim any unless you receive your decision right away. My claim has been sitting with the rating board since April and I haven't heard a peep yet, and I can't say as that I am surprised since I am not a Global War on Terror veteran.

My claim has been with the rating board since February 2007, I contacted my senator's office in November 2006, they contacted the VA in March.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine has been in the rating board since last September.

It appears that everytime a rater does something with it- another rater checks their work.

I went through the Congressional Inquiry stuff in the 1990s-

it meant the claim was pulled from them stack and sat on some guys desk for months until he could make up something good to tell my Congressman and two state Senators.

When he did respond to them it was with a false statement.

Luckily- the response did make me realise that something was more screwed up then I thought-

I fixed it and told my congresional reps that the letter they received from the RO was BS and I told them what really happened.

When Nicholson became the Sec the first week he was there I sent him a letter re BW-AO vets.

This had nothing to do with my claim. He found out I had a claim, and he sent my letter to the RO I deal with.

I didnt hear from him so one day I called for a claim status and was told his letter was sitting on the congressional desk for a response-it had been sitting there holding up my claim for 2 months already- I withdrew his letter from my file -it was not an inquiry on my claim)

I suggest only writing for Congressional Inqueries when you have big problems-then again I only found out I had big problems in the 90s by writing them them-

Congressmen/women and Senators cannot make a decision on your claim-and they cant really make it go any faster-unless it is case of a terminal veteran or something like that-

I should talk0I just remembered -the RO has a letter from Senator Craig- he sent it days after hearing from me- January 2006. That is when they decided to transfer my claim to the BVA.

In the few weeks I was at the BVA the BVA told me that letter was still there unanswered-

I said yeah that is probably why they sent it to you-

the RO got my illegally tranferred claim back and also this letter.

It wont hold up my claim though at this point -because they probably have 'lost' it by now. B)

what a system

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My experience with Congressional Inquiries is that they are usually a waste of time unless you are fortunate enough to have a Congress Critter who is a Veteran advocate.

The VA usually sends a form letter saying that the claim is being processed and that a decision will be made in the near future.

However, I believe that when I asked for help from President Bill Clinton I actually got it and the VA finished my claim in less than 30 days.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Congressional inquiries usually give the VA an excuse to add 60 days to the claim.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Boy this happened to me time and time again. If Senator Warner wasn't sending a letter to the VA it would be Congressman Boucher.

I finally has to write them both and tell them to stop the letters as they would send one out every 3 months and all they would ever find out was that my claim was being worked on.

They were absolutely no help to me.

I did write to President Bush. I wasn't sure if he even received my letter until his name showed up in my remand from the BVA to the AMC.

He was no help either. The BVA state they received the letter in August of 2005 and my file was at the Huntington R. O until December of the same year.

It wasn't until the remand was sent to me April 18th 2006, that his name was mentioned.

I am not sure if the Appeals Mangement Center is actually doing the claims in order, as date received into the rating section, but if I live long enough, I may find out.

I am sure that the VA has already did that Life Expectancy for me.

I have had promises and promises.

Josephine

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use