Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vietnam Service Verified

Rate this question


rthomass

Question

I have a document initiated by the Veterans Administration Medical Center to the Veterans Administation Regional Office. VA form 10-7131. In the remarks section it states (top of form block 6) " Vet claiming agent orange exposure. States he was stationed in Nakhon Phanom Thailand. States they sprayed Agent Orange around the perimeter of the basse, which is located 4 miles from the Ho Chi Mihn Trail".

The VARO replied back to the VAMC " Birls shows VADS verified." (BIRLS and VADS are data bases) "Records also show Veteran has Vietnam Service".

I also have via a Freedom of Information Act request have Birls Veteran Information data screen report showing Vietnam Service "Y" (for yes). This was from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration, Washington DC.

I have to the best of my knowledge never stepped foot in Vietnam; but I do have a Vietman Campaign Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. I am one confused Veteran.

Berta...Vike17 any help?

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Is your name and service number on those records?

Could they belong to someone else?

Are you sure that you have never stepped foot in Vietnam?

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josephine, Name, serial number, branch of service, dates served, and rank are mine. I guess the Government is never wrong. The question is does this confirm boots on the grond in Vietnam? I did take a med-evac flight from Nakhon Phanom Thailand to Utapao AFB Thailand. Maybe on our circle around Thailand picking up patients I landed in Vietnam....I dont remember this.

Again I still need to know if this means VA acknowleges srvice in Vietnam ?

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is always possible the plane made a pit stop on Vietnam soil---to refuel-

Do you have a copy of your SRB- at least that is what the Marines/Navy calls it-

It is a record of arrivals and destinations-regarding overseas service- then again there were many many flights that have no ducmentation behind them.

If the boots on ground factor is important to your claim- VA is saying you were there-

then again it would be great to establish that as fact so somewhere down the road it cannot come back to bite you in the rear-like if VA CUEs themselves on this-

I have an idea- I was student pilot -we always had to have flight plans-

the unit records might have some way to access that flight plan- then again this was wartime- maybe no record-

I have another idea-

I have a complete history with specifications of just about everything they put in the air during the Vietnam war.

If you can give me any details at all as to the type of plane you were on- I could measure the distance between where you said you took off from -and where the plane landed (and how long the flight was picking up patients ) because this could reveal the plane had to either stop for gas in

Vietnam or did pick up patients there-

I am saying plane but Medivac was usually choppers- was this a chopper?

Then - again this would just be a guess-I would practically have to have the tail number to see how much gas the tank of the plane or chopper held-

maybe that would all be a waste of time-

The VA seems to obviously seen something in your records that showed boots on ground-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rthomass -I got out my maps and now I think my scenario is all wrong-

The VA has conceded you had Vietnam Service-

that is great! but now I dont think it involved the Medivac stuff- there might well be something else-

Uta pao (Pattaya) is a good 400-450 miles from Nakhon Phamon-

It would have involved a very big circle and long flight plan for pick ups in Vietnam- not impossible- but still the logistics seem off-

Also this is a long round about way to reach wounded below the line of demarcation with Danang air base so much closer- still not impossible at all-

Reason I rethought my post-

Leaving Uta pao -90 miles SE of Bangkok would put the flight over Cambodia possibly and definitely over Laos- leaving from Nakhon Phamon would be closer to Vietnam- and Vietnam border after crossing over Laos would be about 100 miles from Nakhom-then still one has to add the milage to Ashau or whereever the wounded were picked up from--

So the flights could have involved extraction of wounded from Laos or even Cambodia and not gone into Vietnam at all-

I think the VA might have found proof in a different way then this that you were in Vietnam.If you were ever on the ground in Laos-you were not far from Vietnam.

The Laotian border touched I Corps ops from the DMZ (and of course the north above the DMZ ) from the 17th parrallel to the 15th north of Kontum.

Cambodia borders on Thailand's south east border to near Dak to Vietnam down to Giang Thahn.

The signs of towns etc probably all looked alike-and the actual border was not consistently marked by road signs-I bet vets in Laos or Cambodia could have found themselves on Vietnam soil at times but did not realise it.

Also the war maps contain names of vills and towns that were often hard to understand-

The Marines called Ashau AAAA shaw-

Army vets I know pronounce it as a (small 'a' sound) shaw.Another factor when trying to determine a place in SE Asia where a vet was actually at.

Even Thailand cities like Korat appear on war maps as Nakhon Ratshasima.

Also my daughter -Vietnamese Linguist-Mil-learned two separate dialects in Vietnamese so it is often hard for a vet to know where they were when- with so many linquistic factors and many unmarked borders.

Has the VARO acknowledged this information as to your being incountry- in regards to your claim?

I am so glad VA conceded your Vietnam incountry service but I dont know how it was due to the flight on Medivac-important thing is -the VA knows-

it is probably due to some other maneuver or duty you had. ???

Still it would be nice to know what is was !

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If the VA says you were in Vietnam and you have AO problems I would let that sleeping dog lie right where it is and ask no further questions. File your AO claims while you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Again I still need to know if this means VA acknowleges srvice in Vietnam ?

You were in Vietnam and didn't even know it. I agree with John, if you have Agent Orange Illnesses. Ask no more questions, as you are one of the lucky ones with the proof provided to you by the VA.

Here is your proof.

The VA does not make mistakes. Your name and service number are on those papers and they are most definitely yours.

Remember in the early days, Agent Orange was a Huge NO, No.

They probably didn't want you to know that you were exposed to it.

File the claim and use the papers.

Always,

Josephine

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use