Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Vietnam Service Verified

Rate this question


rthomass

Question

I have a document initiated by the Veterans Administration Medical Center to the Veterans Administation Regional Office. VA form 10-7131. In the remarks section it states (top of form block 6) " Vet claiming agent orange exposure. States he was stationed in Nakhon Phanom Thailand. States they sprayed Agent Orange around the perimeter of the basse, which is located 4 miles from the Ho Chi Mihn Trail".

The VARO replied back to the VAMC " Birls shows VADS verified." (BIRLS and VADS are data bases) "Records also show Veteran has Vietnam Service".

I also have via a Freedom of Information Act request have Birls Veteran Information data screen report showing Vietnam Service "Y" (for yes). This was from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration, Washington DC.

I have to the best of my knowledge never stepped foot in Vietnam; but I do have a Vietman Campaign Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. I am one confused Veteran.

Berta...Vike17 any help?

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Is your name and service number on those records?

Could they belong to someone else?

Are you sure that you have never stepped foot in Vietnam?

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josephine, Name, serial number, branch of service, dates served, and rank are mine. I guess the Government is never wrong. The question is does this confirm boots on the grond in Vietnam? I did take a med-evac flight from Nakhon Phanom Thailand to Utapao AFB Thailand. Maybe on our circle around Thailand picking up patients I landed in Vietnam....I dont remember this.

Again I still need to know if this means VA acknowleges srvice in Vietnam ?

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is always possible the plane made a pit stop on Vietnam soil---to refuel-

Do you have a copy of your SRB- at least that is what the Marines/Navy calls it-

It is a record of arrivals and destinations-regarding overseas service- then again there were many many flights that have no ducmentation behind them.

If the boots on ground factor is important to your claim- VA is saying you were there-

then again it would be great to establish that as fact so somewhere down the road it cannot come back to bite you in the rear-like if VA CUEs themselves on this-

I have an idea- I was student pilot -we always had to have flight plans-

the unit records might have some way to access that flight plan- then again this was wartime- maybe no record-

I have another idea-

I have a complete history with specifications of just about everything they put in the air during the Vietnam war.

If you can give me any details at all as to the type of plane you were on- I could measure the distance between where you said you took off from -and where the plane landed (and how long the flight was picking up patients ) because this could reveal the plane had to either stop for gas in

Vietnam or did pick up patients there-

I am saying plane but Medivac was usually choppers- was this a chopper?

Then - again this would just be a guess-I would practically have to have the tail number to see how much gas the tank of the plane or chopper held-

maybe that would all be a waste of time-

The VA seems to obviously seen something in your records that showed boots on ground-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rthomass -I got out my maps and now I think my scenario is all wrong-

The VA has conceded you had Vietnam Service-

that is great! but now I dont think it involved the Medivac stuff- there might well be something else-

Uta pao (Pattaya) is a good 400-450 miles from Nakhon Phamon-

It would have involved a very big circle and long flight plan for pick ups in Vietnam- not impossible- but still the logistics seem off-

Also this is a long round about way to reach wounded below the line of demarcation with Danang air base so much closer- still not impossible at all-

Reason I rethought my post-

Leaving Uta pao -90 miles SE of Bangkok would put the flight over Cambodia possibly and definitely over Laos- leaving from Nakhon Phamon would be closer to Vietnam- and Vietnam border after crossing over Laos would be about 100 miles from Nakhom-then still one has to add the milage to Ashau or whereever the wounded were picked up from--

So the flights could have involved extraction of wounded from Laos or even Cambodia and not gone into Vietnam at all-

I think the VA might have found proof in a different way then this that you were in Vietnam.If you were ever on the ground in Laos-you were not far from Vietnam.

The Laotian border touched I Corps ops from the DMZ (and of course the north above the DMZ ) from the 17th parrallel to the 15th north of Kontum.

Cambodia borders on Thailand's south east border to near Dak to Vietnam down to Giang Thahn.

The signs of towns etc probably all looked alike-and the actual border was not consistently marked by road signs-I bet vets in Laos or Cambodia could have found themselves on Vietnam soil at times but did not realise it.

Also the war maps contain names of vills and towns that were often hard to understand-

The Marines called Ashau AAAA shaw-

Army vets I know pronounce it as a (small 'a' sound) shaw.Another factor when trying to determine a place in SE Asia where a vet was actually at.

Even Thailand cities like Korat appear on war maps as Nakhon Ratshasima.

Also my daughter -Vietnamese Linguist-Mil-learned two separate dialects in Vietnamese so it is often hard for a vet to know where they were when- with so many linquistic factors and many unmarked borders.

Has the VARO acknowledged this information as to your being incountry- in regards to your claim?

I am so glad VA conceded your Vietnam incountry service but I dont know how it was due to the flight on Medivac-important thing is -the VA knows-

it is probably due to some other maneuver or duty you had. ???

Still it would be nice to know what is was !

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If the VA says you were in Vietnam and you have AO problems I would let that sleeping dog lie right where it is and ask no further questions. File your AO claims while you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Again I still need to know if this means VA acknowleges srvice in Vietnam ?

You were in Vietnam and didn't even know it. I agree with John, if you have Agent Orange Illnesses. Ask no more questions, as you are one of the lucky ones with the proof provided to you by the VA.

Here is your proof.

The VA does not make mistakes. Your name and service number are on those papers and they are most definitely yours.

Remember in the early days, Agent Orange was a Huge NO, No.

They probably didn't want you to know that you were exposed to it.

File the claim and use the papers.

Always,

Josephine

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva went up a rank
      Explorer
    • JME earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • JME earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • JME earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • JME earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use