Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Agent Orange Tied To Hypertension

Rate this question


Philip Rogers

Question

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

It is quite a long IOM report -I have not read it all yet-

I wonder if the VA will even pick up on the "limited" association and dig deeper into this all-

What is astonishing to me is that the VA-even with a DMII AO vet with CAD or CVA due to AO -can say their HBP is "essential" (meaning they dont know the etiology) or even worse attribute the HBP to something else but for the DMII.

Atherosclerosis clearly is an established association medically to DMII-(VMB 2006 ED NVLSP)

If a vet has atherosclerosis and also has DMII - it is more than likely the HBP is due to the secondary atherosclerosis.

My vet rep has a heck of a time getting his HBP SC to his AO DMII and CAD as secondary- the VA rationale was that since he took medication to control his HBP- he didnt have HBP. DUH! But finally he succeeded.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I believe the VA will seize on the word limited as an excuse to continue the current practice of denying SC for HBP.

From my personal experience, the issue is that there is a difference between "higher than normal" BP and diagnosed HBP. I had higher than normal blood presure after returning from Vietnam to civilian life. Proving it is another matter, since it was not high enough (with the numbers used at that time) to require treatment. Indeed I had to get a doctors statement for one employer in the middle 70's, to the effect that the ratio of rest to after excercise BP was wide enough to ignore the higher than normal rest BP. Since I also carried an FAA medical certificate appropriate for an ATR (airline transport rating) it was obvious that the definition of HBP was not very cut and dried. In addition, I believe that the numbers used to diagnose HBP may have dropped in recent years. HBP is associated with Diabetes. Unfortunately it "may" occur as a preliminary symptom of diabetes, well before any diagnosis of diabetes is made. Thus an opening exists for the VA to say that HBP is not directly related to diabetes, and is from other non SC causes.

The significance of the "limited association" is that it provides a direct tie between AO and HBP.

"I wonder if the VA will even pick up on the "limited" association " ---

It is quite a long IOM report -I have not read it all yet-

I wonder if the VA will even pick up on the "limited" association and dig deeper into this all-

What is astonishing to me is that the VA-even with a DMII AO vet with CAD or CVA due to AO -can say their HBP is "essential" (meaning they dont know the etiology) or even worse attribute the HBP to something else but for the DMII.

Atherosclerosis clearly is an established association medically to DMII-(VMB 2006 ED NVLSP)

If a vet has atherosclerosis and also has DMII - it is more than likely the HBP is due to the secondary atherosclerosis.

My vet rep has a heck of a time getting his HBP SC to his AO DMII and CAD as secondary- the VA rationale was that since he took medication to control his HBP- he didnt have HBP. DUH! But finally he succeeded.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use