Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Linking Heart Disease To Ptsd

Rate this question


TiredSgt

Question

Without an IMO/IME, is it possible to link heart disease to PTSD?

I got a letter from Dept. of Veterans Affairs,KY that says:

"1. If you have any additional evidence to submit, please submit medical evidence on your current congestive heart failure and severe cardiomyopathy as well as evidence showing a connection between these two conditions and your service connected PTSD condition. We will consider service connection for your congestive heart failure and severe cardiomyopathy as secondary to your service connected PTSD condition."

I am currently receiving percentages on: 10% Tinnitus, 20% Cervical Spine, 10% Degenerative Disc Disease and 10% PTSD. (50% is what I get).

I'm considering requesting an increase for DDD when I reply to their letter, is this a good idea? Or, should I wait to see if they service connect my heart disease (linking it to PTSD). How do I request an increase from 10% DDD to 50%? Do I just request an increase on the standard "Statement in Support of Claim" form?

My goal is 100% TDIU, any help you guy can give will be greatly appreciated. I remember a while back I asked you guys for advise on getting service connected for PTSD - I took your alls advise and was awarded 10%! Now I need help getting 100%. I have CHF and my back is stiff as a board, unable to bend over to tie my shoes - unbelieveable, constant pain in the middle and lower back. I need some help.

Thanks, Tim

Only God Can Judge Me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"Without an IMO/IME, is it possible to link heart disease to PTSD? "

I have never seen it done and I have been in the electronic disabled veterans community prior to the invention of the internet-2 decades-

If you believe your DDD meets a higher rating based on the Schedule of Ratings (available at hadit under a search) and your documented medical evidence fully warrants the higher rating-by all means file the claim-and tell them why you should get a higher comp rating.

TDIU depends on any service connected disability that is causing you to be unemployable.

A vet could be NSC or at 10% SC and still apply for and receive TDIU- but this depends on the medical evidence that shows the veterans cannot be employed solely due to service connection.

Do I understand they have separated the cervical spine from the DDD?

I am actually surprised that was not combined in VA math-but you say you get 50% . ???

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Tim:

Welcome to Hadit. The VA has pretty much accepted a link between PTSD and Heart Problems. You can find info here on Hadit to help your claim.

Good Luck and thank you for your Service to America.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Linking a physical disorder to PTSD is theory at best. It would take a research MD that is specifically looking into that connection in order to even attempt a connection in my opinion. This isn't to say that PTSD isn't the cause of heart issues (and many other physical ailments), but there is next to no scientific data that shows a causal effect of PTSD in terms of physical conditions.

Also, the fact that you're at 10% for PTSD doesn't bode well for your case....perhaps if you were 100% you could make a better connection between your severe PTSD and physical issues.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay -I sure agree with you-

PTSD vets have had their heart disease sced as secondary but they also had very strong medical opinions-

A psychiatrist -since they are MDs too- unlike psychologists could -probably provide the complete medical rationale for this type of claim.

A VA doctor inadvertently said my husbands's PTSD had caused his HBP to raise (Rod was 100% PTSD) and that emotional disorders can certainly affect the cardiac system.

This was in a DIC denial decision over my Sec 1151 claim (which I was awarded) but I filed a new claim based on this statement-forget what else it said-for direct SC death.Ironically that was a point Rod himself made when he filed a Sec 1151 claim that I re-opened after he died.

He stated that his PTSD had been malpracticed to the extent that his stress might cause death from a stroke or heart attack.He died 6 months later due to undiagnosed heart disease and malpracticed strokes-

I bring up my personal situation and Rods death alot because he didnt die in vain-there were key points to his claims and mine that caused me to learn a heck of a lot as to how the thinking of the VA goes-

The BVA in my opinion makes by far better decisions these days than they used to a decade ago-

It is easy-at the BVA web site- to see why some PTSD vets have had heart disease SCed as secondary and why many haven't.

It all boils down to what type of medical evidence they had and what medical rationale was used.

And the successful ones all had strong IMOs.

Only one VA doctor -Dr. Robert Eliot- ever made a connection between heart disease and PTSD and he wrote a whole book on it- He was the CHief of Cardiology-Gainseville VA.

I sent his book to VA in support of a PTSD to CAD claim I had.

They were mad because I swiped it out of the local VA library-

of course they didnt read it or even any of his studies of autopsies of combat vets KIA in Vietnam-but with significant atherosclerosis already- that he could only attribute -since they were all so young-

to the stress of combat.

Dr. Boscarini also has done considerable work trying to get PTSD associated to heart disease.

The VA puts no credibility on his work in most cases.

I dont know if he does IMos for vets.

Vets have sent his studies in with PTSD to heart claims but the VA says these are not specific to their own disabilities.

These claims need a strong Independent medical opinion.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't believe that there is any way that someone could have 10% PTSD. Either you have it or you don't. If you are functional enough to work than maybe 50% or 70% but 10% is horse hockey.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies, I am unable to pursuade either of my cardiologists to write an IMO? I have tons of internet printouts addressing this issue and directly linking PTSD with heart disease. I guess I'll just have to mail them what I have and hope for the best.

In their last letter to me, the VA stated "...we will consider service connection..."

:huh:

Only God Can Judge Me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use