Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Attorney For Vets Test

Rate this question


Berta

Question

At Army Times also:

http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/08/...alhelp_070823w/

My buddy Ron Abrams (NVLSP) is quoted as to how ludicrous the test is- and this is why my personal lawyer doesn't ewant to take the test-why should he- vet reps dpnt have to:

“It makes no practical sense to make it harder for veterans to get a free lawyer,” said Ron Abrams, joint executive director for the National Veterans Legal Services Program. “For me to tell a $300- to $500-an-hour attorney at a big law firm, ‘Thanks for donating your time, but now you got to go over to the VA and take a test,’ is beyond ludicrous."

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

they should make all of the VSOs take the same damn test then maybe we would get better representation

yet the way they change the rules a test is about useless for alwyers and VSOs

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

VA Decision Officers should have to take the damn test also.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about the letter from the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs? Could not we (vets) ask NVLSP to file a suit contending that the rules promulgated are in direct conflict with the intent as determined by the letter, clearly is contrary to the responses to the posting in the Federal Register and should be struck. I need to speak with you also.

At Army Times also:

http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/08/...alhelp_070823w/

My buddy Ron Abrams (NVLSP) is quoted as to how ludicrous the test is- and this is why my personal lawyer doesn't ewant to take the test-why should he- vet reps dpnt have to:

"It makes no practical sense to make it harder for veterans to get a free lawyer," said Ron Abrams, joint executive director for the National Veterans Legal Services Program. "For me to tell a $300- to $500-an-hour attorney at a big law firm, 'Thanks for donating your time, but now you got to go over to the VA and take a test,' is beyond ludicrous."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I griped to Bradley Mayes about the whole 9 yards on this new reg--in DC- and posted his address here at hadit-he is the guy that published the final reg (which is so unfair)

The VBA said about 2 months I would receive a response but I am still waiting for it-

I am sure NVLSP will take action on this.

It is just ridiculous-

I think if vet reps had to pass the test -the vet orgs who pay them could get rid of some dead weight there-on the ones with the lousiest scores- and then give out smart or dumb buttons to those who passed it- depending on how well they did on the test.

That way at least we would know when we meet a vet rep for the first time we can tell from their button whether we should buy what they are selling.

Pete -I just caught what you said----- YEAH!!!!!

Make the playing field even-

I think the only people around who could pass this test are the good vet reps out there who really know what they are doing, ( and there really are some) plus all the lawyers at NVLSP and the BVA, and also all the people here at hadit.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I griped to Bradley Mayes about the whole 9 yards on this new reg--in DC- and posted his address here at hadit-he is the guy that published the final reg (which is so unfair)

The VBA said about 2 months I would receive a response but I am still waiting for it-

I am sure NVLSP will take action on this.

It is just ridiculous-

I think if vet reps had to pass the test -the vet orgs who pay them could get rid of some dead weight there-on the ones with the lousiest scores- and then give out smart or dumb buttons to those who passed it- depending on how well they did on the test.

That way at least we would know when we meet a vet rep for the first time we can tell from their button whether we should buy what they are selling.

Pete -I just caught what you said----- YEAH!!!!!

Make the playing field even-

I think the only people around who could pass this test are the good vet reps out there who really know what they are doing, ( and there really are some) plus all the lawyers at NVLSP and the BVA, and also all the people here at hadit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they ever reply or stop the run around Berta? Sees like not! My email is kpriessman@msn.com, number is 940-552-2331 Berta, really need to ask you a couple of questions.

Or I will call you or whatever...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use