Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
- 0
Blue Water Veterans To Be Rejected
Rate this question
Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
Rate this question
Question
Stretch
Akaka, seems to be a puppet of Larry Craig's or maybe they are both on the same strings. We had hopes that Akaka would be sympathetic to Blue-Water Veterans after Veterans 30+ years of research and suffering. This legislation is not just against Blue-Water Vets, although it has the appearance of such.
It appears that Senator Akaka, under the shadows of the Ferres Doctrine, would disallow Veterans compensation for suffering caused by Chemical Companies who greatly profited from their Senate bought puppets.
This legislation would protect Chemical Companies from digging in to their coffers to compensate their genocidal treatment, of exposed Veterans Victims, as a setup with a time limit for presumptions. This suggest Chemical Companies admissions of crime, but trying to cut their losses through Lobbied legislation without considering facts of Veterans illnesses related to exposure to AO and other chemicals.
This is Senators Akaka's sole un co-sponsored attempt to reject decisions, authority, and assume power of the CAVC (Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims) in an attempt to back-up a pre conceived and forced decision of the Circuit Court.
This excerpt is from PDF linked at Watchdog.org.
http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/nf07/nfSEP07/nf090907-7.htm
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE S11213 September 6, 2007
By Mr. AKAKA (by request):
S. 2026. A bill to amend title 38, United
States Code, chapter 11, to clarify that an
award of benefits based on a regulatory presumption
established pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
section 1116 after September 30, 2002, cannot
be made effective earlier than the date the
regulatory presumption was established; and
to clarify that the presumption of herbicide
exposure provided by 38 U.S.C. section 1116(f)
applies only to veterans who served in Vietnam
on land or on Vietnam’s inland waterways
and not to those who served only in waters
offshore or in airspace above; to the
Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
2
1
Popular Days
Sep 10
3
Sep 9
1
Sep 11
1
Top Posters For This Question
Stretch 2 posts
rthomass 2 posts
Berta 1 post
Popular Days
Sep 10 2007
3 posts
Sep 9 2007
1 post
Sep 11 2007
1 post
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts