Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Surgeon-dr. Jose Veizaga-mendez

Rate this question


Berta

Question

from VA Watchdog today

"TRIBUNE EXCLUSIVE

Surgeon left trail of fatal errors

Doctor in Downstate death was barred in Massachusetts

By Deborah L. Shelton

Tribune staff reporter

A surgeon barred last year from practicing in Massachusetts after he was accused of providing "grossly substandard care," resulting in deaths and life-threatening complications, was operating on veterans at the Marion VA Medical Center as recently as last month.

Dr. Jose Veizaga-Mendez resigned from the Downstate hospital on Aug. 13, three days after one of his patients there bled to death after routine gallbladder surgery. Shortly after, inpatient surgeries were suspended at the hospital because a computer analysis had uncovered a spike in its number of post-surgical deaths.

On Tuesday, the wife of Robert Shank III, the man who died last month, filed an administrative claim against the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the first step in a lawsuit.

"My husband did not get the care that he should have gotten," said Katrina Shank, who lives in Murray, Ky., about 50 miles southeast of Paducah. "We put our trust in the medical profession. Whether it be a VA or a private hospital, we put our trust and our lives in their hands. For somebody not to come out of a simple surgery, it's just not right."

The VA confirmed that Veizaga-Mendez was employed at Marion but said Wednesday it could not yet answer other questions about him, including whether he is part of an ongoing probe into deaths at the facility. Efforts to obtain comment from the doctor for this report were unsuccessful.

Four top officials, including the hospital director and chief of surgery, have been reassigned or placed on administrative leave as part of the shake-up at the medical center, which serves veterans from 52 counties in southern Illinois, southwestern Indiana and western Kentucky.

Veterans requiring inpatient surgeries are being referred to nearby VA hospitals and private hospitals during the investigation, expected to take at least several months.

In Massachusetts, the state regulatory board last year accused Veizaga-Mendez of failing to report malpractice cases in which he was a named defendant, and of providing woefully inferior care to seven patients. He agreed to surrender his Massachusetts medical license voluntarily in July 2006.

Yet the doctor continued to perform surgeries at the Marion VA, where he had been practicing since January of that year.

Veizaga-Mendez continues to hold a valid license to practice in the state of Illinois, though the state was alerted more than a year ago that he had surrendered his license in Massachusetts.

Veizaga-Mendez's license status in Massachusetts was reported to state medical boards in a national alert in July 2006 and is included in at least one national physician database used to check doctors' backgrounds. It also pops up among the top hits on a Google search of his name.

The VA said in a statement Wednesday that it completes a credentialing process of all physicians prior to granting clinical privileges, including verification with primary sources of information about physicians' education, training, license, certification and experience.

"All verifications are obtained and considered along with the results of queries to the National Practitioner Data Bank/Health Integrity and Protection Data Bank, as well as the Federation of State Medical Boards Disciplinary Alert Service prior to the granting of privileges," the statement said.

Veizaga-Mendez graduated from a medical school in Bolivia, according to the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine.

A VA spokeswoman said she did not know if officials later found out Veizaga-Mendez's license had been surrendered in Massachusetts.

According to a spokeswoman for the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, the agency launched an investigation within 30 days of the national alert. She said the agency's probe was not complete until April.

"It took this long to get all the information back," said spokeswoman Susan Hofer. "And we have to prioritize."

In June, officials scheduled a preliminary hearing to determine if Veizaga-Mendez's state license should be suspended or revoked on the basis of information obtained from Massachusetts.

Another hearing has been scheduled for mid-October. In the meantime, the doctor's state license remains valid.

Hofer said the agency typically is investigating more than 100 complaints against doctors at any given time. About 42,800 physicians and surgeons are licensed in Illinois.

A review of malpractice suits against Veizaga-Mendez and of cases investigated by Massachusetts authorities paints a disturbing picture of a surgeon who repeatedly made life-threatening errors but still was allowed to operate.

A May 2006 report by a peer reviewer spelled out in chilling detail surgical mistakes, errors in judgment, and delays in diagnosis and treatment.

Reviewing the case of a 58-year-old man who died after undergoing a procedure to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease, the report concluded "the standard of care was grossly unmet in this case."

It found that a surgical error committed by Veizaga-Mendez caused a stitch to dislodge and leak fluid from the man's esophagus, resulting in a massive blood infection and respiratory failure. The patient died six weeks later.

"This case is remarkable for multiple errors," the report said.

The family of that patient, Jeronimo Coronado, sued Veizaga-Mendez in a Massachusetts district court in 2003. A settlement was reached before the case went to trial.

"I have been doing this work for 26 years and he is among the very worst that I have ever run into," said Rhode Island malpractice attorney Bennett J. Bergman, who represented the family. "Sometimes doctors are careless and make errors, but in my opinion this went way beyond that. I felt the man was dangerous."

In a case not included in the state authorities' report, a jury awarded $652,000 to a Massachusetts man and his wife after Veizaga-Mendez placed two sutures from a hernia repair directly into his bladder. For almost four years, the man "suffered from blood in his urine, knee-buckling pain every time he moved his bowels or urinated, and couldn't work or have relations with his wife," said Byron Taylor, the Massachusetts attorney who represented him.

Other errors noted in the state report include misdiagnoses that led to the wrong surgical procedure being performed, prolonged delays in diagnosing post-surgical complications and the use of improper surgical methods.

Patients were described as requiring lengthy hospitalizations, unnecessary surgeries and prolonged pain. Some faced the possibility of future surgeries that should have been unnecessary.

In one case, Veizaga-Mendez had planned to treat and discharge a critically ill patient instead of performing surgery. After another physician intervened, Veizaga-Mendez operated, but his errors led to fever, blood infection, pneumonia and a heart attack, according to the investigator.

The report on the seven cases concluded: "I find that the most significant and repeating issue of the involved surgeon is a lack of judgment. ... Many of these complications could have been avoided by sound judgment and adherence to surgical fundamentals. ... This should be addressed to prevent injuries to future patients."

Air Force veteran Robert Shank, 50, was unaware of his surgeon's troubling past as he waited on the operating table at the VA in Marion last month. His mind, his wife said, was focused on hunting and fishing and spending time with his six children and four grandchildren.

"We told each other we loved each other. It was just like any day," a sobbing Katrina Shank recalled.

"It was supposed to be so simple."

She now wonders why Veizaga-Mendez was allowed to practice in Illinois given his past troubles.

"He's got to be stopped somehow," she said. "No other family should have to go through this."

----------------------

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

This is just heart breaking and pitiful. I feel that whether it's in the private sector or VA,

practicing medicine this way is unacceptable. Yes, mistakes are made but when it happens so often this doc needs to be stopped.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA owes the patients better protection from Doc's like this. They should know that if they have had practice problems that the VA is not a place for them to go. We deserve better.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use