Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
ammawa

Appeals Management Center

Question

The BVA awarded me 20% for my back problem back to 1992. making my back a total of 60% I'm already 100% IU effective Jan 2004 But I put my claim in for IU in 1992. So I'm still fighting for 10 years of retro. Well along with an appeal for my back injury the BVA awarded me the 20% on my back... the BVA sent my case to the AMC for consideration on the other issues...like determining if i should be awarded 100% back to 1992.

I understand that they have to take their time an consider whether or not I'm entitled to 100% paid back to 1992...but I don't understand why I am still waiting on retro for the 20% for my back effective feb 1992. That decision was made in March 2007. I should have been had that payment. it's been 7 months and the Appeals Managemnt Center keeps saying that it is in the final phase of the paper work.

Is this normal to be awarded a claim and take this long to get your retro payment? I got a letter from DAV in Washington, DC in June of this year saying that the DAV has reviewed the most recent decision and i should get a conformation letter soon from the VA> Well... I'm still waiting. I have been waiting 7 months on my retro payment.

Anyone have this problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

They usually send the retro as soon as they award-

I always got the check before I even got the award letter itself-

Hang on veteran- that retro might be higher than you thought-

I know how miserable it can be to know they owe you some money but not get it-

but I think they are making sure- if they resolve the others issues and it would provide a higher award-

they want it to get into that retro check.my opinion-

If that is not the case-hopefully at least DAV said you would hear something soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hope I understood you correctly-

I am glad I read this post again because -

Do I understand that they did award 100% TDIU in 2004 but the retro you want is because they had the TDIU claim in 1992?

They are surely determining if the medical evidence warranted retro back to 1992 as long as you continuously NOdded their denials and full prosecuted this claim.

One of my vet friends kept at them for over 20 years and he finally succeeded -mega bucks in retro- he just simply would not give up and I commend you because you wont give up either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your exacly right Berta... I have vigously appealed all denials that I have ever gotten when it comes to my back, and knees I kept appealing every percentage for my back and knee...starting with the 10% the VA awarded me in 1992 from there it went to 30% to 40% to (60% effective March 2007)

And I have had the TDIU in since Aug 1992 becasue my claim is that my singe back injury kept me from maintaing gainful emplyoment then... not 2004 which they said was the dated of the examination showed proof on IU

And the TDIU has been rmanded 3 times from BVA back to the VARO.

Now that the BVA granted me 20% to my already 40% makes 60% (which is also the max you can get for your a back injury. in the CFR Regulations it stated that if you have ONE service connected disability rated at 60% you shal be rated 100%IU. So that ruling makes it hard for them to deny my IU back to 1992

I still think as long as it has been I would have thought they would have payed me buy now.

But, you're right i have held their feet to the fire since day one and will not give up until I get every penny.

10 years of IU is a good little bit But 7 months counting since i got my BVA decision.

hope I understood you correctly-

I am glad I read this post again because -

Do I understand that they did award 100% TDIU in 2004 but the retro you want is because they had the TDIU claim in 1992?

They are surely determining if the medical evidence warranted retro back to 1992 as long as you continuously NOdded their denials and full prosecuted this claim.

One of my vet friends kept at them for over 20 years and he finally succeeded -mega bucks in retro- he just simply would not give up and I commend you because you wont give up either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The BVA awarded me 20% for my back problem back to 1992. making my back a total of 60% I'm already 100% IU effective Jan 2004 But I put my claim in for IU in 1992. So I'm still fighting for 10 years of retro. Well along with an appeal for my back injury the BVA awarded me the 20% on my back... the BVA sent my case to the AMC for consideration on the other issues...like determining if i should be awarded 100% back to 1992.

I understand that they have to take their time an consider whether or not I'm entitled to 100% paid back to 1992...but I don't understand why I am still waiting on retro for the 20% for my back effective feb 1992. That decision was made in March 2007. I should have been had that payment. it's been 7 months and the Appeals Managemnt Center keeps saying that it is in the final phase of the paper work.

Is this normal to be awarded a claim and take this long to get your retro payment? I got a letter from DAV in Washington, DC in June of this year saying that the DAV has reviewed the most recent decision and i should get a conformation letter soon from the VA> Well... I'm still waiting. I have been waiting 7 months on my retro payment.

Anyone have this problem?

Someone who is familar with the situation, please answer this question, if possible. If a vet receives a denial on secondary conditions to a claim with instruction to submit a form 9 for appeal if wanted and in that same legal documents of denial the decision states that you service-connected condition on _____ wil be addressed in a separte issue. What if the vet appeals before they get the decision letter or the money on the SC that is to be decided in the separte issue. Would the VA consider the vet to be appealing all contained in the ruling? Not a question that I know the answer to and would like to know it, because I have the same situation where secondary conditions have been denied and hinted at a least, if not a proclaimation made on being granted SC in another area in the same document. If the vet appeals to the Regional within the sixty day time frame, are they appealing everything contained in the document, including the granted part not yet received. Someone without a lawyer would have trouble wording the appeal in a legal fashion to prevent appealing also the possible granted SC before it was decided and awarded on the separate issue. Since the condition or percentage would be decided in a separate issue and the vet had not received the ruling in the mail it, could be considered to be appealed. I am awaiting a letter as we speak on a SC stating a separate issue would be addressed in a separate issue. I may be wrong, but I feel it would dangerous to appeal anything until I receive the SC and the ruling on the separate issue. Are they dragging their feet until my sixty days has expired and I would be forced to appeal to Washington within a the 1 year time limit or possible expecting me to appeal so they can consider all the conditions again and yet another waiting period? Comments please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Someone who is familiar with the situation, please answer this question, if possible. If a vet receives a denial on secondary conditions to a claim with instruction to submit a form 9 for appeal if wanted and in that same legal documents of denial the decision states that you service-connected condition on _____ Will be addressed in a separate issue. What if the vet appeals before they get the decision letter or the money on the SC that is to be decided in the separate issue. Would the VA consider the vet to be appealing all contained in the ruling? Not a question that I know the answer to and would like to know it, because I have the same situation where secondary conditions have been denied and hinted at a least, if not a proclamation made on being granted SC in another area in the same document. If the vet appeals to the Regional within the sixty day time frame, are they appealing everything contained in the document, including the granted part not yet received. Someone without a lawyer would have trouble wording the appeal in a legal fashion to prevent appealing also the possible granted SC before it was decided and awarded on the separate issue. Since the condition or percentage would be decided in a separate issue and the vet had not received the ruling in the mail it, could be considered to be appealed. I am awaiting a letter as we speak on a SC stating a separate issue would be addressed in a separate issue. I may be wrong, but I feel it would dangerous to appeal anything until I receive the SC and the ruling on the separate issue. Are they dragging their feet until my sixty days has expired and I would be forced to appeal to Washington within a the 1 year time limit or possible expecting me to appeal so they can consider all the conditions again and yet another waiting period? Comments please.

Danang_1969

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.

       

      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.

       

      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.

       

      P&T

       

      TDIU

       

       

       

      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.

       










      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.


      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.


      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law


      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual


      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures


      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation


      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

       
      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.

       

      The report is here:

      https://www.nap.edu/read/25137/chapter/2

      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.

       

       

       
      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines