Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Claim Denied

Rate this question


ddj6969

Question

I just recieved my rating decision on my claim of athletes foot. I was given a service connection but given a 0% rating.

The only evidence used was my SMR's and a examination from my Dr., I was not given a medical exam by the VA.

The VA states "We have granted a service connection for your athlete's foot because your SMR's show you were treated for and diagnosed with athlete's foot while on active duty. We have assigned a 0 percent disability evaluation based on private medical evidence that reveals you have athletes foot on your left foot. It was noted you were prescribed topical medication for control. A noncmpensable evaluation is assigned unless there is difigurement; limitation of motion or fnction due to scarring; pain on examination of scars; frequent loss of covering of skin over scars; or dermatitis or eczema affecting at least 5 percent of exposed areas or requiring systematic therapy."

The part they left out was that my Dr. stated I have over 50% of my foot covered.

I have prepared my appeal letter but am looking for any advice on how to proceed.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"He said anytime you file a claim for SC and it is awarded but you are not satisfied with the rating decision overall, don't appeal it. He said file a new claim for a rate increase because it gets "worked" a lot faster. He also mentioned that the new claim generally ends up with a "new" etc-

This is absurd advice.

Then again what better way to save money for the VA.

If the vet doesn't appeal and then files for higher rating as a new claim-

the retro money that the appeal could have awarded - is lost.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a newbie to the board.....that sounds logical, but wouldn't that nullfy any chances of retro pay?

Yes, I'm sure that it would lower the amount of retro but you would still get the retro from the date of your claim. So, it might not be years of it but a few months. That is probably why he did say "there is a time to NOD and appeal." Every situation/claim would be different, I'm sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He said anytime you file a claim for SC and it is awarded but you are not satisfied with the rating decision overall, don't appeal it. He said file a new claim for a rate increase because it gets "worked" a lot faster. He also mentioned that the new claim generally ends up with a "new" etc-

This is absurd advice.

Then again what better way to save money for the VA.

If the vet doesn't appeal and then files for higher rating as a new claim-

the retro money that the appeal could have awarded - is lost.

Berta, it may be "absurd" advice to the veteran who doesn't mind waiting years for his/her appeal. I have a new claim being worked but my claim dated 2003 is STILL on appeal. I think it is a personal thing and really depends on the individual veteran situation. But it is just FYI/INFO not me saying someone should do this or not. Frankly, I like the idea of "fresh eyes" looking at my claim, especially when I have seen in another thread that a rating specialist stated that he "...decides a claim depending on what side of the bed he got up on."

I, personally, have been receiving SSD since 2005 and I'm not interested in a mega retro check. My life has not stopped, which means my bills still need to be paid. So, hey, it may not work for you or others. But if my new claim is favorably decided within the next 60 days, I will definitely be okay with that, big retro or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I'm a newbie to the board.....that sounds logical, but wouldn't that nullfy any chances of retro pay?"

I think you are right on the button Sidney-

Say vet gets award for 30 % PTSD in 2002 and does not appeal or NOD the award.Lets say the claim had been at the VARO for 1-2 years already.and disabilities can get worse from the time the initial claim is filed- lets say -The medical evidence warranted a higher rating then 30% but the vet didnt appeal that rating.Or the vet also got SSA award for PTSD during or after time of the 30% grant.

The vet waits until 2005 to file a "new claim" - a TDIU claim -with a 21-8940.

The vet is awarded TDIU back to the date in 2005 that he filed the TDIU claim.

The vet NODs and sends them the SSA award. The VA grants one additional year of retro due to the SSA award (back to

2004).

Yet still if the 30% should have been higher in 2002-

at 50%, 70% or even TDIU - the vet has lost all of that potential retro by not appealing the original decision and rating.

My husband was a good example:

30 % from 1983 to 1988

he got into voc reb and I already bored everyone with what happened.

One semester and the VA proposed to reduce him to 10%. 1988

I filed a NOD for him. 7-8 months later they dropped that idea and restored him to 30%. 1989.

In 1992 a VA doctor told him the 30% was way too low and he filed for higher rating.

I dont even remember him filing formally for TDIU.

In 1993 SSA awarded him SSA solely for PTSD.

In 1997- 3 years after his death

VA awarded him 100% SC P & T for PTSD back to 1991.

Say VA had denied his claim for higher rating he filed in 1992-and he never appealled it.

Then lets say he lived long enough to apply for TDIU in 2003.

Maybe the VA would have granted an additional year retro to the 2003 claim- due to his SSA award but he forfeited 9 years of retro by not pursuing the 1992 denial.

One doesnt go from 30% to 100% overnight either-he had to have been 50 and then 70 and then 100% but

the VA never accounted for that at all.

They aren't going to give staged ratings unless the vet makes a point of asking for it and NODs and continues their appeal until they get what they want-and this way they preserve their EED for the proper retro.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the great replies everyone!

I have filed my appeals and am wondering what to expect next?

I really have no clue so if someone could give me the step by step I would appreciate it.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta pretty much says it all. Filing a new claim changes the effective date and you also are required to bring new and material evidence up to get back in the door. Latley the VA has taken these refiled claims if there was exposure for many back years.

Even though it appears that nothing is happening as a claimant you can take some steps to shorten the process. I recommend that you notify the VARO that you are ready to proceed and rate your claim and that you want them to use the evidence that they have.

If you are early in the claim you can go to your VAMC and get all the progress notes and take them to your VSO to send to the VA. Don't forget to notarize any statements you send including buddy letters. See if you can get your Medical Records I ran around Dallas and got some myself.

Call them and see what status ask you VSO to call and ask how the claim is doing. Its a free call and yes they talk to each other.

My Last Claim for HB benefits was done in under 4 months and my Dro Hearing was today in under 6 months. When I took my C&P I signed a STatement that I was ready for them to rate with the evidence that they have.

Good Luck

I would never refile I think it is a mistake keep the claim working.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use