Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Top Va Officials Plotted To Indict Vet In Violation Of Federal Va Rules

Rate this question


Question

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

9/03/2007

National VA Director Pushed US Atty Biskupic to Indict Wisconsin Veteran

[Please credit Michael Leon at MAL Contends. Contact Michael Leon at maleon64@yahoo.com or maleon@charter.com for more information.]

Top VA Officials Plotted to Indict Vet in Violation of Federal VA Rules

http://malcontends.blogspot.com/2007/09/na...ed-us-atty.html

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Posted

I thought I was indicating by analogy ( a very important concept in Veterans Benefits) that there is a very different set of rules as to what constitutes fraud depending on the situation.

Since veterans claims are restricted to a special system with special rules, some of which are supposed to protect veterans (with some of those rules apparently being set aside in this case).

It is/was a politically Neutral statement. I did not advocate his guilt or innocence. I noted that the senate acquited, everthing in the statements are part of the records. My only political statement is can this group fix the system.

How and why the impeachment was prosecuted even has some relevance to the issue. Politics not public interest determining government action.

If I have crossed a line (as fuzzy as it may be) I apologize.

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

The fact is this "is" a political attack on us and the Justice dept.

Roberts, Ramos and Compean are still in prison and will likely remain there until after the elections in 08.

When and if anyone chooses to free those who have sworn to protect us, will not likely happen while we're focused on what a past President has said.

I have to tell you Tyler, if you think your helping your party by making such stupid remarks, your not.

I happen to know there are many dedicated "honest" republicans running for office that wish you to get off the Clinton "lies" BS.

If you choose to do nothing to clean up these lawless acts against US Veterans, some 25,000,000 us us and growing, your going to reap what you sow somewhere down the road.

Let me ask this, can we as a people create and pass laws to protect Veterans in the future from such CRIMINAL acts?

Can we pass laws to hunt those down that have commited ilegal acts against us in the past and imprison "THEM" for their crimes?

Posted

My last post should have posted under Pete's post.

it was intended to discuss/clarify why I used that reference and has been mis-understood. Because of how it was posted and my poor choice of words, not due to any individual/s capabilities of comprehension.

Any additional comment I might make on this subject will probably be over scrutinized and argued on minutia, so I will drop out of the discussion.

Allan, I do not belong to any political party and I feel that my post is being mischaracterized. I clearly choose a poor example for an analogy.

Best regards,

Tyler

Posted

Tyler, I think you were taken out of context by over thinkers, I get it. RC

GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.

"Do more than is required of you."

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Tyler:

I apologize if I misunderstood your post but as an over thinker I was worried about another dustup between the pro war and anti war Members or maybe it would be the Democrat and Republican members.

I was along with the ride when it involved a Veteran who was being persecuted and mistreated by the VA. The train turned down a dirt road when it diverted to a political catfight between people who could at least defend themselves.

I am dropping out also. Be nice to each other.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

  • In Memoriam
Posted

Biskupic, only used his own agenda driven investigation. He didn't go to the FBI or Postal Inspector for an out side investigation. This could mean that Mr. Biskupic, could be fired from his job and then given another higher paying job.

Biscuits, has sure messed up this time.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use