Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cnn To Do Expose On

Rate this question


Berta

Question

I also saw this advertised last night and believe they said this will be a two part show this coming Saturday and Sunday night at 8 PM-on CNN-

If anyone can confirm- please do-

email from Jere Berry at ALLVETS

"CNN will be airing a blistering report on the Department of Veterans Affairs and their total failure to meet their commitment to our disabled veterans. I urge everyone to tune-in to see how CNN handles this very sensitive subject. Also, tonight at 8PM on CNN is a Special on Homeless Veterans.

Jere Beery

National Public Relations Director

Operation Firing For Effect

www.offe2008.org "

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I have not seen this posted......

Subject: Message from Ranking Member Steve Buyer on $1 Billion Cut in Veterans Benefits

Veteran’s Committee Passes a $1 Billion Cut in Wartime Elderly, Poor, Disabled Veterans’ Benefits

From: Congressmen Steve Buyer, Ranking Member, House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

This mailing was prepared, published and mailed at taxpayer expense.

November 8, 2007

Dear AMVETS member:

The House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, on a party-line vote, passed a democratic amendment in the nature of a substitute that would effectively cut nearly a billion dollars in pension benefits for wartime, elderly, poor, severely disabled or house-bound American veterans to fund new benefits for World War II Filipino veterans.

In the House of Representatives, H.R. 760, the Filipino Veterans Equity Act of 2007, as amended, would eliminate special monthly pensions for many severely disabled veterans over 65 who are also receiving pensions for wartime service. It would use nearly all of the $965 million saved by this unprecedented cut in veterans’ benefits eligibility to provide budgetary offsets to fund oversized pensions for non-citizen, non-resident World War II Filipino veterans. Similar legislation, S. 1315 as amended, is being considered in the Senate.

I am proud to report that national leaders of AMVETS have taken a forthright and principled stand for veterans in opposing H.R. 760, as amended that cuts benefits to one group of veterans to pay for another group. AMVETS clearly recognizes that this policy is wrong and is an injustice for all veterans.

Background: In 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims overturned a Department of Veterans Affairs decision that denied an 86-year-old, legally blind World War II veteran, Robert A. Hartness, a VA benefit called a “special monthly pension” (SMP). The SMP provides an additional payment of up to $2,200 per year to the most severely disabled veterans who are eligible and who apply

The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims reversed VA’s denial of benefits to Mr. Hartness and required VA to begin paying SMP. The court held that U.S. Law requires an award of SMP to a veteran eligible for VA non-service-connected disability pension if, in addition to being at least 65 years old, he or she has a minimum disability rating of 60 percent or more, or is considered permanently housebound. VA had determined Mr. Hartness to be 70 percent disabled due to loss of vision.

H.R. 760 was introduced by House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Chairman Bob Filner in January. In July he amended the bill, adding a section which restricts SMP eligibility. The amended H.R. 760 grants pensions for Filipino WWII veterans living overseas: $8,400 per year for a married veteran, $6,000 per year for a single veteran, and $3,600 per year for surviving spouses. Budgetary offsets are necessary for such spending. In restricting SMP eligibility, Chairman Filner “found” a $965 million offset.

The median annual Filipino family income is about $2,500. Adding insult to injury for those elderly, poor, disabled U.S. Veterans whose benefits would be cut, the average married Filipino WWII veteran would thus receive the U.S. Income equivalent of over $100,000, due to the income disparity between the two countries.

In July, committee Republicans offered an amendment to preserve SMP eligibility. In a nearly party-line vote, committee Democrats refused the amendment, voting to cut these veterans’ benefits by nearly $1 billion. According to VA, more than 20,000 veterans could be affected by this unprecedented cut in benefits.

The valor and courage of the Philippine Army, which fought alongside U.S. Forces to defeat Imperial Japan in World War II, has been demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt. Despite claims, no U.S. Official during or immediately after the war was authorized to promise benefits to members of this army or to so obligate the U.S. Government. When the Philippines became an independent, sovereign nation after the war, the Philippine Army became the responsibility of the new government.

It is unbelievable to me that the Democratic proposal would take benefits from elderly, poor, severely disabled or house-bound American veterans – many from WWII – to finance a new entitlement program for Filipino veterans.

We could vote on these bills in late November. Please let me know what you think of this cut of nearly $ 1 billion in benefits from veterans who most need our support by calling (202) 225-3527.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not read The amended H.R. 760 so I don't know what it says about SMP.

I do know that Steve Buyer has voted repeatedly against properly funding the VA and has no room to speak about denying veterans benifits. His concern is not about US Veterans losing bennifits, his record proves that. It is about spending additional funds by entitleing others to funds.

I would read the bill myself and draw conclusions before relying on that two faced peice of feces' idea of what is good for veterans or the country.

Time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buyer is a crook, liar and a disgrace to the military uniform. Him and all of his herotic acts during the Gulf War my butt...... He should be hung from the highest tree in his district for being a traitor. I only hope that his precious family is stricken as my family has been while he has been on this roller coaster power hunger ride he is on.

Oh! I forgot to mention the most important thig HE IS AN IDIOT!

Edited by Ricky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

CBS is doing an expose on the VA on the 6:30 news. It should be on tonight as well. Everyone should know by now the awful conditions facing American vets and soldiers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use