Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

C & P Make Sure They Do It Right

Rate this question


maxwell18

Question

This may help in processing and getting your claims through the the system. After submiting claims and receiving denials I started reviewing how the C&P should have been conducted and found in a lot of cases the person did not follow the VA requirements for C&P exminations. Example, for my back problems no range of motions measurements were taken. A requirement for ratings. The guide is called "Clinician's Guide" March 2002. I found this on the internet and printed the whole guide off and put in a binder. It covers every detail and guidence for them to follow in all C&P. I think you will find if you check this out you will much better armed for your actual C&P examnations on what they should be checking and doing and give a heads

up what to reply to. As you already know when they ask how you feel your response should be your worse day because you say OK they will turn it around that you said you don't have any problems.This has happened to me severals times. Pain rating one to ten, if you feel good you say 4, they will say no problem on your C&P. Another note, on my Social Security claim, turned down three times. I went to the office that handled my claim and reviewed my claim records,about 80% of the records was blank. I appealed again asking how a determention could be made with all information missing? Came back in about three weeks approved. Botttom line..100% schedule P&T and Security Security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

good post maxwell...i printed the guide off several weeks ago and stuck it in a binder myself. When the time came for my back C&P, I took out the appropriate one and brought it to the exam with me. Since he let my wife intot he exam room also, I had her follow the step by step instructions to the dr., and take notes. It was very helpful. I already have 2 CUE's if I need them from this last exam, and I have one CUE for the one done in 2003, where they took away the 10% for my back. I went from 30% down to 20% for ROM that wasn't measured with a goniometer...go figure. It also stated in the C&P findings that I still had pain on ROM, which is an automatic 10%, but I guess they forgot that part..haha.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone wants to self educate them about the VA Rating System and Adjudication process and laws that govern the VARO, go out and get yourself from a Barnes and Noble or GSA website the full copy of the Title 38 CFR. It has all the rules, regulations, ratings percentages guidelines, etc.....best $60.00 investment I have ever made.

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Blank C & Ps are all here:

http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/Benefits/exams/index.htm

Here is the whole Book C 38 CFR Rating schedule:

http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/bookc.html

The M21-1MR guidelines that the VA uses for adjudicating claims is at:

http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/M21_1.html

I dont use 38 USC much-I prefer 38 CFR-

Also the best investment in my opinion that any veteran can make- who might have numerous issues or a complex claim (and of course ANYONE who does claims advocacy needs this book)

is the Veterans Benefits Manual pubished annually by NVLSP (National Veterans Legal Service Program)

All that a vet needs is here at hadit-too- under searches-lots of the regs and links to them-

also BVA decisions (while the VA wont accept them usually to support a similiar claim) are a wealth of claims info, and also the General Counsel Precedent Opinions at their web site and of course the CAVC on line.

You are right- a faulty C & P exam can be challenged if the vet knows what the C & P should have covered but didnt.

I commend you for bringing this up- as maybe many dont know how much info is actually here at hadit-

and also available at the VA web site itself.(an excellent source itself)

The advocates rate for the VBM is about $130.00 (maybe less if you have low state tax) and I have purchased them since 1991,I keep in contact with the NVLSP lawyers,and the NVLSP web site for anything new in the regs etc, and won not only an FTCA settlement but my other past claims due primarily to their excellent information.My vet rep at that time saw no potential at all in my claims.This was before the internet provided all we need.

My former DAV rep found out I won them all in the DAV lawyer's office.

The internet and the easy access we all now have to everything that VA uses in the claims process( as well as units for buddy statements, medical info,the wealth of veterans sites etc) is the ultimate weapon in the War of the words that a VA claim is.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
The Blank C & Ps are all here:

http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/Benefits/exams/index.htm

Here is the whole Book C 38 CFR Rating schedule:

http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/bookc.html

The M21-1MR guidelines that the VA uses for adjudicating claims is at:

http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/M21_1.html

I dont use 38 USC much-I prefer 38 CFR-

Also the best investment in my opinion that any veteran can make- who might have numerous issues or a complex claim (and of course ANYONE who does claims advocacy needs this book)

is the Veterans Benefits Manual pubished annually by NVLSP (National Veterans Legal Service Program)

All that a vet needs is here at hadit-too- under searches-lots of the regs and links to them-

also BVA decisions (while the VA wont accept them usually to support a similiar claim) are a wealth of claims info, and also the General Counsel Precedent Opinions at their web site and of course the CAVC on line.

You are right- a faulty C & P exam can be challenged if the vet knows what the C & P should have covered but didnt.

I commend you for bringing this up- as maybe many dont know how much info is actually here at hadit-

and also available at the VA web site itself.(an excellent source itself)

The advocates rate for the VBM is about $130.00 (maybe less if you have low state tax) and I have purchased them since 1991,I keep in contact with the NVLSP lawyers,and the NVLSP web site for anything new in the regs etc, and won not only an FTCA settlement but my other past claims due primarily to their excellent information.My vet rep at that time saw no potential at all in my claims.This was before the internet provided all we need.

My former DAV rep found out I won them all in the DAV lawyer's office.

The internet and the easy access we all now have to everything that VA uses in the claims process( as well as units for buddy statements, medical info,the wealth of veterans sites etc) is the ultimate weapon in the War of the words that a VA claim is.

What do you do when the examiner bases all of his conclusions on the

word, " Appears"?

Appears to have symptoms of a personality disorder.

Appears she did not acquire a chronic psychiatric disability in service.

The preponderance of the evidence suggest that the etiology of her

anxiety appears to have preceded service.

Anyone, where is this word " APPEARS" located in the regulations or

codes?

Thanks.

Betty

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you say is indeed critical when you meet the Doc for your C&P. My award letter included the C&P examiners findings and right there in quotation marks was exactly what I said when asked "How are you doing today"...I replied "not very good at all". Be honest, but be careful because what you say can and probably will be used against you.

Can We save Our Nation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Betty

"Appears is very weak language and is not up to standard of "more likely than not". "Appears" is just not a diagnosis. It leaves it open to debate and conjecture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • kidva earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use