Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dependents' Educational Assistance

Rate this question


Wings

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

[Federal Register: January 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 4)]

[Rules and Regulations]

[Page 1075-1076]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr07ja08-8]

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 3

RIN 2900-AM72

Dependents' Educational Assistance

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)

regulation regarding dependents' educational assistance. A recent

statutory change provides eligibility for dependents' educational

assistance for dependents of servicepersons who meet certain criteria.

This final rule is necessary to incorporate statutory amendments into

VA regulations.

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective January 7, 2008.

Applicability Date: In accordance with statutory provisions, the

amendment in this final rule will be applied retroactively. The

amendment to 38 CFR 3.807 is applicable for a course of education

pursued after December 22, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maya Ferrandino, Regulations Staff

(211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits

Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue,

NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-7210. (This is not a toll-free

number.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 301 of the Veterans Benefits, Health

Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006, Public Law 109-461,

amended the basic eligibility criteria for dependents' educational

assistance (DEA) in 38 U.S.C. 3501(a).

Under prior law, spouses and

children of servicemembers missing in action, captured in the line of

duty by a hostile force, or forcibly detained or interned in the line

of duty by a foreign government or power had eligibility for DEA.

The amendments expand eligibility, for pursuit of a course of education

that occurs after December 22, 2006, to include spouses and children of

servicemembers receiving treatment for permanent and total disability

incurred in the line of duty and likely to result in discharge or

release from service.

VA's DEA regulations, specifically 38 CFR 3.807(a)(5), restate the

statutory basic eligibility criteria for spouses and children of

servicemembers. Accordingly, we are amending that provision, consistent

with the amendments to section 3501(a), to clarify that spouses and

children of certain permanently and totally disabled servicemembers are

eligible for DEA for pursuit of a course of education that occurs after

December 22, 2006.

Administrative Procedures Act

Substantive changes made by this final rule merely reflect

statutory requirements. Accordingly, there is a basis for dispensing

with prior notice and comment and a delayed effective date under the

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553. Use of those procedures would be

impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This document contains no provisions constituting a new collection

of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.

3501-3521).

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) assigns a control number

for each collection of information it approves. VA may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of

information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

In Sec. 3.807 (concerning certification of basic eligibility for

dependents' educational assistance), the final rule amends provisions

concerning information collection requirements that are currently

approved by OMB under the following control numbers: 2900-0049 (VA Form

21-674, Request for Approval of School Attendance), 2900-0098 (VA Form

22-5490, Application for Survivors' and Dependents' Educational

Assistance), 2900-0099 (VA Form 22-5495, Request for Change of Program

or Place of Training Survivors' and Dependents' Educational

Assistance).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements

of sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.

601-612, are not applicable to this rule because a notice of proposed

rulemaking is not required for this rule. Even so, the Secretary of

Veterans Affairs hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities

as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This final rule

would not affect any small entities. Only individual VA beneficiaries

would be directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),

this final rule is also exempt from the regulatory flexibility analysis

requirements of sections 603 and 604.

Executive Order 12866

Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and

benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is

necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits

(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,

and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive

Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review

by OMB unless OMB waives such review, as any regulatory action that is

likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the

economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way

the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,

the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal

governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or

otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;

(3) materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user

fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients

thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive

Order.

The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy

implications of this final rule have been examined and it has been

determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive

Order 12866.

Unfunded Mandates

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, codified at 2 U.S.C.

1532, requires agencies to prepare an assessment of anticipated costs

and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure

by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the

private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for

inflation) in any year. This final rule would have no such effect on

State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers and Titles

The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program number and title

for this rule is 64.117, Survivors and Dependents Educational

Assistance.

List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3

Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,

Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam.

Approved: November 16, 2007.

Gordon H. Mansfield,

Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans

Affairs amends 38 CFR part 3 as set forth below:

PART 3--ADJUDICATION

Subpart A--Pension, Compensation, and Dependency and Indemnity

Compensation

1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart A continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless otherwise noted.

2. Revise Sec. 3.807(a)(5) to read as follows:

Sec. 3.807 Dependents' educational assistance; certification.

* * * * *

(a) * * *

(5) Is on active duty as a member of the Armed Forces and

(i) Now is, and, for a period of more than 90 days, has been listed

by the Secretary concerned as missing in action, captured in line of

duty by a hostile force, or forcibly detained or interned in line of

duty by a foreign Government or power; or

(ii) Has been determined by VA to have a total disability permanent

in nature incurred or aggravated in the line of duty during active

military, naval, or air service; is hospitalized or receiving

outpatient medical care, services, or treatment for such disability; is

likely to be discharged or released from such service for such

disability; and the pursuit of a course of education by such

individual's spouse or child for which benefits under 38 U.S.C. chapter

35 are sought occurred after December 22, 2006.

* * * * *8

[FR Doc. E7-25657 Filed 1-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use