Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
Wings
[Federal Register: January 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 4)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1075-1076]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07ja08-8]
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900-AM72
Dependents' Educational Assistance
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
regulation regarding dependents' educational assistance. A recent
statutory change provides eligibility for dependents' educational
assistance for dependents of servicepersons who meet certain criteria.
This final rule is necessary to incorporate statutory amendments into
VA regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective January 7, 2008.
Applicability Date: In accordance with statutory provisions, the
amendment in this final rule will be applied retroactively. The
amendment to 38 CFR 3.807 is applicable for a course of education
pursued after December 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maya Ferrandino, Regulations Staff
(211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-7210. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Section 301 of the Veterans Benefits, Health
Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006, Public Law 109-461,
amended the basic eligibility criteria for dependents' educational
assistance (DEA) in 38 U.S.C. 3501(a).
Under prior law, spouses and
children of servicemembers missing in action, captured in the line of
duty by a hostile force, or forcibly detained or interned in the line
of duty by a foreign government or power had eligibility for DEA.
The amendments expand eligibility, for pursuit of a course of education
that occurs after December 22, 2006, to include spouses and children of
servicemembers receiving treatment for permanent and total disability
incurred in the line of duty and likely to result in discharge or
release from service.
VA's DEA regulations, specifically 38 CFR 3.807(a)(5), restate the
statutory basic eligibility criteria for spouses and children of
servicemembers. Accordingly, we are amending that provision, consistent
with the amendments to section 3501(a), to clarify that spouses and
children of certain permanently and totally disabled servicemembers are
eligible for DEA for pursuit of a course of education that occurs after
December 22, 2006.
Administrative Procedures Act
Substantive changes made by this final rule merely reflect
statutory requirements. Accordingly, there is a basis for dispensing
with prior notice and comment and a delayed effective date under the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553. Use of those procedures would be
impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions constituting a new collection
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501-3521).
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) assigns a control number
for each collection of information it approves. VA may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
In Sec. 3.807 (concerning certification of basic eligibility for
dependents' educational assistance), the final rule amends provisions
concerning information collection requirements that are currently
approved by OMB under the following control numbers: 2900-0049 (VA Form
21-674, Request for Approval of School Attendance), 2900-0098 (VA Form
22-5490, Application for Survivors' and Dependents' Educational
Assistance), 2900-0099 (VA Form 22-5495, Request for Change of Program
or Place of Training Survivors' and Dependents' Educational
Assistance).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements
of sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601-612, are not applicable to this rule because a notice of proposed
rulemaking is not required for this rule. Even so, the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This final rule
would not affect any small entities. Only individual VA beneficiaries
would be directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
this final rule is also exempt from the regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review
by OMB unless OMB waives such review, as any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been examined and it has been
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, codified at 2 U.S.C.
1532, requires agencies to prepare an assessment of anticipated costs
and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure
by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any year. This final rule would have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers and Titles
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program number and title
for this rule is 64.117, Survivors and Dependents Educational
Assistance.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
Approved: November 16, 2007.
Gordon H. Mansfield,
Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR part 3 as set forth below:
PART 3--ADJUDICATION
Subpart A--Pension, Compensation, and Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation
1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart A continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless otherwise noted.
2. Revise Sec. 3.807(a)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 3.807 Dependents' educational assistance; certification.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(5) Is on active duty as a member of the Armed Forces and
(i) Now is, and, for a period of more than 90 days, has been listed
by the Secretary concerned as missing in action, captured in line of
duty by a hostile force, or forcibly detained or interned in line of
duty by a foreign Government or power; or
(ii) Has been determined by VA to have a total disability permanent
in nature incurred or aggravated in the line of duty during active
military, naval, or air service; is hospitalized or receiving
outpatient medical care, services, or treatment for such disability; is
likely to be discharged or released from such service for such
disability; and the pursuit of a course of education by such
individual's spouse or child for which benefits under 38 U.S.C. chapter
35 are sought occurred after December 22, 2006.
* * * * *8
[FR Doc. E7-25657 Filed 1-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
Jan 15
1
Top Posters For This Question
Wings 1 post
Popular Days
Jan 15 2008
1 post
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now