Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

This And That

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

This and That

If you have not seen the Blue Water Navy Posting at:

http://bluewaternavy.org/brownpaper.htm

Please do so. This is a must read for all Veterans but especially for Vietnam Veterans.

Just some of that below:

…Veterans Affairs erroneously notes that the National Academy of Science (NAS) has been successful in the process of "incorporating science into difficult and contentious veteran compensation policy decisions.” I believe it has been clearly pointed out how very far from truth this statement is. (See Part I and Part II ). In fact, it is Brown himself that states there is no scientific basis for the very important underlying foundation to "presumptive exposure" and the exclusion of off-shore military personnel from that presumption. Generally and overall, the NAS has been blind to and evasive of viable, formal research that supports medical and scientific studies of off-shore personnel that prove their disabilities, which look exactly like those disabilities of in-country vets, are far more likely than not to have been caused by the same dioxin poisoning as the in-country veterans experience.

It appears that those specific elements which the VA requests from the NAS and the Institute of Medicine (IOM), which eliminate legitimate medical research supporting the claims of off-shore personnel, is exactly what is delivered to the VA in the bi-annual updates to the Agent Orange Review.

In a word, NAS/IOM have utterly and completely failed their mission as originally given them by the Agent Orange Act of 1991. Additionally, the VA seems to have control over what medical and scientific information appears in their reports, and they continuously delete existing evidence that would prove them wrong.

Given the admissions of Mr. Brown, the VA has been caught up in a two-faced lie.

This also goes back to my contention that NAS/IOM uses apple comparisons for negative recommendations when they should be only comparing orange comparisons, which actually reflect the Veterans Legacy. Although the challenge above indicates NAS/IOM, maybe more controlled by Veterans Affairs than we or I have contemplated. The deletion of scientific data by Veterans Affairs should not surprise anyone in our elected congress or the President or any Veterans and widows of Veterans. Ranch Hand scientists faced the same issues with not only deletion of data but also the changing of concluding medical statements already cleared for publication. By the way, congressional members were presented those very facts by the scientists under oath in 2000. Still nothing was done by congress to stop that known fraudulent activity. And we can assume unless we elect someone besides those in office now, the IOM accusations above will go unchallenged by those we elected to protect us against what must be considered as “government collusion.”

I had already contended that the new definitions by IOM of what is significant sounded like Veterans Affairs mandate, not the use of scientific common sense. As the evidence grows stronger in many areas, the only thing they can do in order to deny is make the association requirements more stringent and IOM is doing that as we speak.

It is simply mind boggling and despicable that our congress can go on and on about 8 District Attorneys that were replaced, meet an entire weekend to resolve the Terri Schiavo debacle, spend all this time on baseball players taking drugs trying to kill themselves for fame and continually let the Veterans of this Nation face what is described in the http://bluewaternavy.org/brownpaper.htm on the Blue Water Navy site, much less what I have pointed out and will continue to do so.

Even more outrageous is this congress, both parties; still will want the Veterans and widows vote to keep them doing nothing.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Had a lot of e-mail replies on the Veterans Union. I have no idea how to but I am thinking. I believe at first it can be run out of folks home in the different states. Nevertheless, without money to support the activities is seems it would be a long hard road.

Although even at $2.50 a head per year, we are possibly talking in the millions and that certainly eventually would have a big impact not only in DC but also at the congressional district levels and senate races.

Anyway, a state plan as well as national plan is needed and I am not sure I am the one to do that.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

E-mail from Berta Simmons

My special guest for Wednesday January 16th at SVR Radio (6:30 EST) will be Robert P. Walsh, the highly regarded and well-known veteran's attorney from Battle Creek Michigan.

Mr Walsh also teaches at the University of Detroit Law School and his law practice involves VA claims as well as Social Security Disability claims.

As a veteran, Mr. Walsh was in the US Army Reserves and the National Guard-and is a Vietnam veteran who was with the 101st Airborne in-country.

He is presently representing Keith A. Roberts who has been incarcerated, in a case that got attention all over the veteran's electronic community, due to alleged VA fraud.

Also he handled the FTCA case, Brown V. Veterans Administration regarding Leishmaniasis.

He has experience in all facets of VA case law and we will be discussing CUE claims as well as other matters of importance to veterans.

Call in toll free at 1-877-213-4329

http://www.stardustent.com/ just click on SVR on the left or download the plug in to get to our chat room.

Berta Simmons Volunteer Veteran's Advocate

Might be a good chance to call in and ask legal questions as to how in the world we can fix this system since our own congress refuses to act.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you know of any Vietnam Veteran with Parkinson’s or Parkinson’s like symptoms if they have not done so please have them contact:

Steve at swfiscus@msn.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gary Henton passed away on Monday

I sent out the following to my Battalion.

2/94th Member Lost

Gary Lee Henton an original member of our 2/94th C Battery passed away on January 14, 2007 at 10:25 in Fitzgerald, Georgia. As most of you know, Gary had been battling lung cancer he developed from Agent Orange for the past 6 months.

Visitation will be tomorrow night at Paulks Funeral home in Fitzgerald, Georgia from 7-9 PM. A service will be held Thursday morning at the chapel in the funeral home at 10 AM and gravesite services will be at Andersonville National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia at 2 PM.

Funeral home link: http://www.paulkfuneralhome.com/

There is an online registry to sign-in or view after clicking on Gary’s Obituary.

In the fall of 1966, the Vietnam War intensified along the Demilitarized Zone. Fearing an all out crossing in force by the North Vietnamese Army a call went out from the 3rd Marines for heavy long-range artillery. Gary’s Army 175 mm Gun Battalion rerouted in route from the United States to Vietnam was given that task. Specialist Henton and the Battalion completed all fire missions assigned to them with professionalism, honor, and valor with Specialist Henton being wounded in action on 9 May 1967.

Gary was a joy at our Battalion reunions by many that served in the Battalion after Gary and he will be missed. Gary was someone that any of us would have been proud to serve with.

The Battalion sends its deepest sympathy at Specialist Henton’s loss.

We thank Specialist Henton and the entire Henton family for Gary’s service to the 2/94th Battalion, The United States Army, and this Nation.

Specialist Gary Lee Henton C Battery 2nd Battalion 94th Artillery Vietnam 1966-1967 “Rest in Peace”.

For Karen Henton and myself I again want to thank those that helped to get Gary’s claim through the system. I am quite sure without that help another Vietnam Veteran would have gone to his dirt nap with no service connection and certainly no financial support while he was still alive. This would have been just another feather in the Veteran’s Affairs cap.

Congress would rather investigate and have special investigators for baseball players rather than investigate what has gone on forever against this Nations Finest.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have been asked to list some Veterans Political Issues for 2008 and am in the process of doing that.

Best to all,

Kelley

http://www.2ndbattalion94thartillery.com:8...hisandThat3.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use