Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Whats Next Step?

Rate this question


donews

Question

Thank you in advance for reading and replying!

I have my latest Rating Decision & Statement of Case here in front of me. I am digging into it for the information I need to appeal the mistakes.

This is the Adjudicative Actions so far:

03-28-2005 Claim Received.

03-30-2006 Claim considered based on all the evidence of record.

03-31-2006 Claimant notified of decision.

03-21-2007 Notice of Disagreement received.

04-30-2007 Appeal Election Letter sent to appellant.

06-28-2007 De Novo Review election received from appelant.

12-17-2007 De Novo Review performed based on all the evidence of record.

Ok, so the querstion is:

Can I use a NOD or Request for Reconsideration to disagree with the rating and EED, or do I have to take the big step and go on to the BVA?

  • I am not appealing the actual SC, they did give me SC for all except one of the conditions requested.
  • I am appealing the fact that they gave me SC because of "Aggrivated by" instead of "Secondary to or Caused by", which I believe makes the difference between having it added to my combined rating and getting the 0% they gave me.
  • I am also appealing the % of rating they used 60% when figuring the aggrivation factor, and it should have been 100%. I meet the 100% guidelines.
  • Then lastly I am appealing the EED becaue I am also appealing the DMII EED that this is connected to.

    Donewsome

Donewsome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I have no answer for your question, but I do want to compliment you on the manner in which you presented your situation. Reminds me of SGT Joe Friday on "Dragnet" back in the 50ies--"Just the facts Ma'mam;" nothing but the facts."

It also reminds me of NCOERs and after action reports...

Edited by Manitou Sprgs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On anything they issued a new rating decision on you will have one year and must be appealed via a NOD. If it was in your original rating decision and the denial is continued in the SOC then you must appeal to the BVA via a Form 9 WITHIN 90 DAYS OF THE SOC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Can I use a NOD or Request for Reconsideration to disagree with the rating and EED, or do I have to take the big step and go on to the BVA?"

Don I thought I made some strong points here already as to filing-in your case- a Reconsideration Request-

check the older pages for the posts under your topics-

You can file eithe NOD or Recon Request- but the Recon request-if they do not resolve it within one year after the decision- in that case you still must file a formal NOD-

Did you get a VCAA letter and election notice- when you first filed this claim?

Did you get anything in whch to request a DRO review?

I suggest you get a vet rep from any of the orgs who has an office right in the RO you deal with-

give him/her printoffs of my Reconsideration posts-

if they need to contact me we can arrange that-

tell them I have expertise in Nehmer-

I dont see too many claims like yours that really should be properly done by the VARO right away-due to their errors-especially since NVLSP got on their case for proper Nehmer awards long ago-

It is my position that NO claim should ever get to the BVA-

I like the BVA_ they are lawyers and they know how to read.

BUT- high level GS fed employees at VAROs get paid good money to do this stuff right at the RO level-the first time around-

the BVA would see so many errors here at this point that your claim would-after getting a docket- etc-maybe 1-2 years down the road -only be remanded to the RO for them to sit on their thumbs with it waiting for them to do it all over again.

As the Washington Post stories told us years ago-

Knight Ridder series on VA-

a Remand is a Re-do at the expense of taxpayers and at the cost of the waiting games for disabled vets who sometimes die waiting.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if this will help you or not but this is what I did. Fill out the form 9 for the appeal. Then write a letter asking for a DRO hearing. At my DRO hearing I won 3 of the 4 claims,

Jim

Delay, Delay, Delay another thousand Vets will die today. This has been almost a 9 year trip thru the VA maze.

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Can I use a NOD or Request for Reconsideration to disagree with the rating and EED, or do I have to take the big step and go on to the BVA?"

Don I thought I made some strong points here already as to filing-in your case- a Reconsideration Request-

check the older pages for the posts under your topics-

You can file eithe NOD or Recon Request- but the Recon request-if they do not resolve it within one year after the decision- in that case you still must file a formal NOD-

Did you get a VCAA letter and election notice- when you first filed this claim?

Did you get anything in whch to request a DRO review?

I suggest you get a vet rep from any of the orgs who has an office right in the RO you deal with-

give him/her printoffs of my Reconsideration posts-

if they need to contact me we can arrange that-

tell them I have expertise in Nehmer-

I dont see too many claims like yours that really should be properly done by the VARO right away-due to their errors-especially

My apolagies Bertha you did point that out.

I have not filled out a VCAA response to this particular Rating Decision yet.

I think I will use the NOD format and ask for a meeting with the DRO, as it was a DRO that gave me this SC in the first place. I had called the RO to ask if the DRO was going to contact me about this claim and they said your decision is finished and just waiting for signature. 2 Weeks later (Jan 8th) I got the Rating Decision.

I just feel that once I can show the evidence that my DMII predates my 1st Heart Disease by at least 16 years and that I have Chronic Congestive Heart Failure instead of just Congestive Heart Failure, they will either Rate me the Difference Between 60% and 100% or they will make the SC for "Caused by" instead of "Aggrivated by". Unless I am mistaken that is the difference between having them add the SC Heart Disease into my combined rating instead of the 0% they gave me.

I will check on an Vet Rep in the RO office, but that is about 3-4 hours from my home.

Donewsome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have many reps with offices at the Buffalo VARO building who I never saw during entire process of my past claims or even during my present claims-I dealt with them via email and also with the closest POA office.

You dont really always have to meet them one to one-

I think most of the vet orgs handle the bulk of their claims by mail and phone-

One to one however is good because they can take the time to look it all over while you are there-

are you close to any vet org at all which would have a contact person in their offices at a RO?

Whichever way you feel is best- will be the best way to support this-

"I just feel that once I can show the evidence that my DMII predates my 1st Heart Disease by at least 16 years and that I have Chronic Congestive Heart Failure instead of just Congestive Heart Failure, they will either Rate me the Difference Between 60% and 100% or they will make the SC for "Caused by" instead of "Aggrivated by". Unless I am mistaken that is the difference between having them add the SC Heart Disease into my combined rating instead of the 0% they gave me."

I have seen many DMII vets who get their first DMII diagnosis at the C & P- DUH! Then the VA uses that as their EED DOuble DUH!

They might have years of private med recs for the DMII that VA doesnt have or didnt consider- and then if they have heart disease- the VA tries to say the heart disease predated the DMII--- triple duh-in some cases-

Medical evidence of a direct association of DMII to eventually causing

heart disease is what these claims need.If there is no DMII association than "aggravation of" can be the way to go-

you sound like a good service rep yourself!

Looking at this all in every way possible-

dont forget all- you can raise many reasons for service connection-

I supported three separate reasons in 3 separate claims-with medical evidence for each specific to each reason-that the VA should directly SC my husband's death.Once they properly award one of them-the other claims will be moot issues.I am not wasting time from any other claimant- they are focusing on the main SC claim and if they deny that one then they have to consider the other ones.

I completely agree with your take on the CAD-heart claim- and even the SSA award is solely for heart disease right?

You and your son have done such a great job so far---

it is the VA that has messed up here.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva went up a rank
      Explorer
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use