Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Combat Cets With Diagnosis Of Ptsd No Longer Have To File Stressor Letter

Rate this question


jessejames

Question

http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2008/02/...dproof_080218w/

PTSD victims no longer need to prove trauma

By Kelly Kennedy - Staff writer

Posted : Monday Feb 18, 2008 16:45:50 EST

The Veterans Affairs Department has dumped a policy requiring combat vets to verify in writing that they have witnessed or experienced a traumatic event before filing a claim for post-traumatic stress disorder, said the chairman of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee.

“This change provides a fairer process for veterans with service-connected PTSD,” Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, said in a written statement. It “leaves claim adjudicators more time to devote to reducing the staggering backlog of veterans’ claims.”

In the past, a veteran has had to provide written verification — a statement from a commander or doctor, or testimony from co-workers — that he or she was involved in a traumatic situation in order to receive disability compensation for PTSD from VA. The Defense Department uses the same rules in evaluating PTSD for disability retirement pay.

In Iraq, troops joke about keeping a pen and paper on hand in case they witness a shooting or explosion or are injured themselves. That way, they can run around and have all their buddies sign a quick statement saying it really happened. The joke loses steam when a Marine has to prove he was involved in a traumatizing event when he had a hand blown off in that event, or when a soldier has to prove he watched his friends die to qualify for benefits.

The rule also slows the process as veterans wait for yet more documentation before their claims may be processed.

Akaka said he asked VA Secretary James Peake if the rule was necessary, and asked that it be removed. Peake agreed.

“I am pleased that the secretary took quick action to reverse this requirement after it was brought to his attention,” Akaka said.

In the future, veterans will be diagnosed with PTSD through a medical examination with no further proof necessary, Akaka said, adding that he’s been told that Peake has already informed VA regional offices of the decision.

VA officials were not immediately available for comment Monday, a federal holiday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

So for all the vets who start to have PTSD symptoms years after discharge this will not mean a thing? Most Vietnam vets did not start to have symptoms until months or years after discharge. What good does this ruling do them if it only applies to an in-service diagnosis of PTSD? Is this just goobly gook. For the guy who was not awarded a CIB but who drove into an ambush in Afghanistan or even Vietnam as a truck driver how does this help unless he has immediate symptoms of PTSD. Do you still have to prove the event happened and document it all? This would just be the same standard others with mental disorders who were treated in service get now. The vet is still liable to get a PD diagnosis and booted out of service. When I was in Vietnam I actually say a shrink and he talked to me for ten minutes and said I was a personality disorder and should be discharged. This was after ten minutes. Unless things have changed a great deal no soldier is going to ask for that kind of deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

VA Announces New Guidelines For PTSD Claims

Terri

February 19th, 2008

In The News, Life, Military, PTSD, Traumatic Brain Injury, Military Medical Issues

In the past when a Servicemember filed a claim for PTSD, they had to also provide written verification that they witnessed or experienced a traumatic event. That written verification had to be a statement from a commander, doctor or fellow servicemembers, stating that he or she was involved in a traumatic situation leading to PTSD, before the could receive disability compensation for PTSD from the VA. Today, the Veterans Affairs Department announced that combat veterans will no longer have to verify in writing that they have experienced a traumatic event, according to the chairman of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee.

“This change provides a fairer process for veterans with service-connected PTSD,” said Senator Daniel Akaka, in a written statement. “It leaves claim adjudicators more time to devote to reducing the staggering backlog of veterans claims.”

Troops in Iraq and Afghanistan have joked about keeping a pen and paper handy to document when they witness a shooting or explosion, or perhaps are injured themselves. That joke isn’t such a joke when they have to prove that that they were involved in a traumatic event, even when they are injured from the event. Or when a servicemember has to prove that they witnessed a friend be injured or die, in order to qualify for benefits. That requirement has slowed the process, as veterans wait for the required documentation before their claims can be processed. Akaka said he spoke with VA Secretary James Peake about this and the delay the rule caused in processing claims. Peake agreed that the rule could be removed.

“I am pleased that the secretary took quick action to reverse this requirement after it was brought to his attendion,” Akaka said.

With the changes in the rule, veterans will be diagnosed with PTSD through a medical examination and won’t have to provide any further proof. According to Akaka, he was told that Peake has already informed VA regional offices of the new rule.

Hopefully, this will help to speed up the process of the diagnosis of PTSD and the compensation to the Servicemember. I’m interested to see if this indeed will help to speed the process up and help to eliminate some of the backlog for VA claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am seeing this info misinterpreted in the electrontic vets community-

here is the Press Release from Senator Akaka:

http://veterans.house.gov/hearings/

"Veterans Diagnosed with PTSD on Active Duty No Longer Required to Provide Further Evidence of PTSD

Responding to Akaka's inquiry, new VA Secretary takes quick action

February 15, 2008

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senator Daniel K. Akaka (D-HI), Chairman of the Veterans' Affairs Committee, commended Veterans Affairs Secretary Peake for agreeing that veterans who are diagnosed with PTSD while on active duty should be recognized as having PTSD for VA purposes. This decision will end VA's requirement that veterans diagnosed with PTSD while on active duty provide additional evidence of exposure to specific stressors during their service in order to establish their diagnosis of PTSD. Responding to an inquiry from Chairman Akaka, Secretary Peake has directed the VA regional offices to no longer require such evidence but instead to immediately schedule examinations for such veterans in order to determine the severity of their PTSD for VA compensation purposes.

"I am pleased that the Secretary took quick action to reverse this requirement, after it was brought to his attention," said Senator Akaka. "This change provides a fairer process for veterans with service-connected PTSD, and leaves claims adjudicators more time to devote to reducing the staggering backlog of veterans' claims."

Secretary Peake notified Senator Akaka about the change this week, in response to a January 2008 inquiry from Akaka. In his inquiry, Senator Akaka pointed out that VA was requiring veterans already diagnosed with PTSD during active duty to otherwise prove they had PTSD. Senator Akaka requested that VA quickly end this practice. "

___________________________

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Well looks like they rushed to make this the same as it was. If you were diagnosed with PTSD in Service there would be no problem in first place. Like John999 says most PTSD surfaces after Vet has left the Military. Or even the cruelest of all the Vet hides it while they serve

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am a peacetime vet who has a clear diagnosis of ptsd on AD. Now I am SC for mdd, sure wish I could get my claim corrected to EED. My mind boggles with so much. Hoping for current VA diagnosis of PTSD (sounds strange I know, no one should hope for ptsd). Next step to correct ptsd issue claim denial if possible. AH, the paperwork.

*Found interesting PTSD reading material,

PTSD Compensation and Military Service Progress and Promise 2007

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11870&page=1

VA Should Institute Better Claims Process For PTSD, Study Finds

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/70429.php

well looks like they rushed to make this the same as it was. If you were diagnosed with PTSD in Service there would be no problem in first place. Like John999 says most PTSD surfaces after Vet has left the Military. Or even the cruelest of all the Vet hides it while they serve
Edited by cowgirl

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use