Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Upcoming Re-evaluations And Vcaa (berta!)

Rate this question


cowgirl

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Two things, I have upcoming recheck/evaluations on my #1increase request and #2tdiu application. Hope thats in the right order, I will have to double check the paperwork. I am concerned that for insured claim success I may have a need for a IMO beyond the clear diagnosis's the VA has given me. Can anyone tell me about rechecks and what the implications are for a generic VCAA that doesnt 'specify' exactly whats needed, beside 'any other information I want to submit'. thanks so much, cg

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Two things, I have upcoming recheck/evaluations on my #1 increase request and #2 tdiu application. Hope thats in the right order, I will have to double check the paperwork. I am concerned that for insured claim success I may have a need for a IMO beyond the clear diagnosis's the VA has given me. Can anyone tell me about rechecks and what the implications are for a generic VCAA that doesnt 'specify' exactly whats needed, beside 'any other information I want to submit'. thanks so much, cg

Cowgirl, Do not understand "recheck"; do you mean re-evaluation and/or C&P Exam?

TDIU does not require a medical exam; it is an administrative decision based upon the evidence of record showing your occupational unemployability - due to the severity of your service-connected disability.

Your Re-exam for #1 SC disability needs to show or opine a chronic or progressive or acute worsening of the disability at issue. ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Generally, VA examiners agree w/the previous examiner. Anytime a claimant requests an increase, on an existing s/c disability, the VA is required to do another or current C&P exam. The diagnosis is a done deal and is not the problem but rather how the VA rater "rates" you. If you are having specific problems be sure the comp examiner addresses those in his/her exam report.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Can anyone tell me about rechecks and what the implications are for a generic VCAA that doesnt 'specify' exactly whats needed, beside 'any other information I want to submit'. thanks so much, cg "

The implications of receiving a generic VCAA letter with and without a VCAA election form can be found in thousands and thousands of claims at the BVA website-

on remand after at least a year or more at the BVA due to prejudicial error-

A generic VCAA letter (meaning a letter that does Not contain a specific highlighted (in bold type) or underlined statement telling a veteran or widow exactly what evidence the VA needs-

and if there is no VCAA election is most often considered a prejudicial error in violation of our DTA rights per the BVA-

and in most cases the BVA will remand the claim back to the same RO for a re-do of what they were paid to do in the first place.

As you know I have asked Congressman Filner ( CHairman House VAC) and Congressman Hall (NY) to propose my amendment to the VCAA.

ROs have turned our ultimate VCAA regulation into one big scam-

somehow they decide who will and who will not get a legal VCAA letter and election notice-

those who dont (like me) are in the claims system for years ( 5 years in my case until I got a legal VCAA letter and election notice a few months ago)

I responded with my medical evidence again to the legal VCAA and election form I got (most of which they had for years without reading it at all)

and suddenly they began to work aggressively on my claims.

If you have a vet rep make sure they are aware that the VCAA was generic- they can determine if it is prejudicial.

My amendment puts the onus onto reps (and us claimants too) to ask VAROs for legal VCAA letters within 60 days of their recipt of this request.

This was all recently discussed in the H VAC Backlog committee hearing on Feb 14th- the gov is fully aware of this problem-Vet orgs know of it, VA knows of it, the public vuia Knight Ridder knows of it,

our Duty to Assist rights are being crapped on- these are the most important and fundamental rights we have as claimants.

I am doing all I can to get the VCAA amended and maybe somehow reps could be penalized if they allow an illegal VCAA letter to cause a claim to be denied.

Within weeks I will have prepared a complaint that I am seeking a lawyer to handle-

regarding all veterans and widows adversely affected by illegal VCAA letters whose POA (new York State Division of Veterans Affairs) sat by and allowed the violations to occur- as a class action complaint-

if I cannot get class action status (dont see why not-many of these vets and widows are at the BVA web site repped by NYSDVA and remanded due to VCAA prejudicial errors) I will just go ahead and sue on my own behalf.

Unless I can get this amendment through-

I cannot stress enough that a VCAA letter

1. MUST be specific to the claim and define the evidence they still need

2. Must have a VCAA election notice enclosed, whereby the vet checks Box one or Box two, signs, copies it, and mails it with Proof of mailing back to the VARO.

Only when they see this election notice will they again begin to work aggressively on the claim.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greetings all:

Just a quick comment. We all seem to keep buying into this line the VA is selling us on a C&P exam is required. It is only required if there is not sufficient medical evidence of record to make the decision. I was talking with Detroit VARO about my Hypertension claim yesterday and the staffer indicated I was an "OPPS" when I inquired about not having recieved a notice on the C&P exam they said the were scheduling(letter dated 12/4/07). I asked what an "OOPS" was and she said they forgot to schedule me. She indicated they would schedule one and let me know about it. I indicated to her they really didn't need a C&P since I have an inservice diagnosis and extensive history in my service medical records and I have a current diagnosis and treatment from VA. She indicated they have to do one. I told her the regulations indicate it is only necessary if the medical evidence is incomplete. I then clearly stated I would go to any physical they want to schedule. Through out this I kept my most relaxed tone and even parsing as I spoke.

It seems they could save some money and time if they would just read the claim and evidence at the front end of this process. Furthermore, they just might be able to write a proper VCAA letter also (for Berta :) ).

Best regards,

Tyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use