Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Four Soldiers Killed On Dmz, Korea 1969

Rate this question


qrdgv2tebc

Question

Hi

I believe some ask about the the names of the four soldiers killed on the DMZ in Korea 1969, they all had bulletts hole in the headthey were ambushed by the north korans, here are the names.

1. S.Sgt James r. Grissinger

2. Spec/4 Charles E. Taylor

3. Spec/4 Jack L. Morris

4. PFC William E. Morris

I was with the CAv at the time we were sent to the Z. there was a firefight with four north korean , but nobody was killed, they made it back to the north. we stayed on the Z for fourteen days, patrolling the American sector of the Z

Hope the name help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Just curious: What Cav, in 1969?? The 1st Cav colors were reassigned to Ft Benning, GA, on 7/1/65 and the 2nd Division colors reassigned to Korea. The 1st Cav departed GA, shipping from Savannah, enroute to Viet Nam and arriving in VN in September, 1965, and remained there until 1971, when the final brigade returned to CONUS.

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this vet means the 2nd ID-in Korea ????

The 2nd ID -many units in their infantry divisions- Brigades 1,2,3,4

and also many in support =Field Atillery, Singal and engineers- etc-

were exposed to AO along the northside of the civilian control line of the DMZ-southedge- from April to Aug 1968 and May to July of 1969.

VA has awarded AO comp to some of those veterans.

I recently met a lawyer representing vets who was unaware of these regs-

Also 7th ID ,3rd brigade , some Mechanized and some armor-

and by now maybe even more units-I will check-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious: What Cav, in 1969?? The 1st Cav colors were reassigned to Ft Benning, GA, on 7/1/65 and the 2nd Division colors reassigned to Korea. The 1st Cav departed GA, shipping from Savannah, enroute to Viet Nam and arriving in VN in September, 1965, and remained there until 1971, when the final brigade returned to CONUS.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious: What Cav, in 1969?? The 1st Cav colors were reassigned to Ft Benning, GA, on 7/1/65 and the 2nd Division colors reassigned to Korea. The 1st Cav departed GA, shipping from Savannah, enroute to Viet Nam and arriving in VN in September, 1965, and remained there until 1971, when the final brigade returned to CONUS.

pr

Hi

I was with 2/10 Cav,Camp Kaiser Korea 1969-71

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this vet means the 2nd ID-in Korea ????

The 2nd ID -many units in their infantry divisions- Brigades 1,2,3,4

and also many in support =Field Atillery, Singal and engineers- etc-

were exposed to AO along the northside of the civilian control line of the DMZ-southedge- from April to Aug 1968 and May to July of 1969.

VA has awarded AO comp to some of those veterans.

I recently met a lawyer representing vets who was unaware of these regs-

Also 7th ID ,3rd brigade , some Mechanized and some armor-

and by now maybe even more units-I will check-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious: What Cav, in 1969?? The 1st Cav colors were reassigned to Ft Benning, GA, on 7/1/65 and the 2nd Division colors reassigned to Korea. The 1st Cav departed GA, shipping from Savannah, enroute to Viet Nam and arriving in VN in September, 1965, and remained there until 1971, when the final brigade returned to CONUS.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use