Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bva And Amc

Rate this question


JoAnn

Question

Hi all again. After receiving the letter stating that I was going to be denied my claim at the BVA I wrote all of you and you had excellent advice. However, based on what you all told me and what has happened I am very confused.

I filed my claim in the Reno Nevada Regional Office. My appeal was done through the traveling board. I finally got a C&P ordered from the BVA. It was returned for further clarification and the doctor for the C&P was in my favor and then stated it again for the BVA. The next thing I knew I received a letter from the Seattle Regional Office stating that my claim was going to be denied and gave me 30 days to respond. I sent them a copy of all of my specific evidence based on their denial. Today I called the AMC and was told that a decision was made on my claim and that it had been sent to the DAV Washington office for review. I was then told that the decision would be sent back to the AMC who would forward it to Reno Regional Office for disemination. My DAV officer here in Vegas told me that that was standard protocal and that it would take another two to three months for me to know what the decission was. So here are my questions:

1. The denial came from a rating board out of Seattle. I understood that my claim could not leave Washington once it had gone there.

2. The denial overturned the judges opinion. The judge found a service connection and that is why I finally got a C&P exam. In fact it was returned just to verify that the doctor also found a connection.

3. The denial went over the top in calling me a liar and stated that I did not have anything in my files to support the claim at all. That is when I sent them all of the evidence again, hilighted so they would not need to read it all but would see that I did fit within the guidlines of service connection.

4. The DAV in Washington is reviewing the decision for errors. Is this routine?

5. Reno will be the one to issue the decission. How can one office issue a decission from another office?

6. Is this really standard protocal?

I am becoming ill with stress over my claim. I want to contact my stated Senator to show him the letter from the Seattle office and how slanderous it was. Even my therapist said that the letter went over the top and was very disrespectful of who I am. I need to know if there were any rules broken by the VA in their handling of my claim. I have read where the claim should not have left Washington and I have also read where the rating board cannot overturn the decision of the BVA. Your advise please.

Respectfully,

Jo Ann :blink:

US Army

1974-1977

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"The DAV in Washington is reviewing the decision for errors. Is this routine"

actually it is routine but I am surprised that a more local rep isnt doing this-

I am confused by all this-

Were you able to fully satisfy everything they asked for long ago-in the VCAA letter they sent to you?

If you sent them the evidence they wanted in the VCAA letter all you can do is wait it all out.

Hopefully the local rep might be able to find more out from the DAV rep in DC.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Jo Ann

Something is wrong here the AMC is used by the BVA to help expedite claims that need further development. I don't understand why Seattle would be doing anything unless this is your Regional Office?

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Jo Ann,

I am like Pete, I am going to try to understand what you are saying.

This is the route that mine took.

Went to the BVA

Remanded to AMC

Received SSOC from AMC - was called at home and advised to waiver my 60 days for new evidence. Had not received SSOC from AMC at the time. I agreed like an idiot.

Ask Judge to waiver for New Evidence

He agreed

Went to an Expert Psychiatrist in D.C

Judge at BVA - had my case completely investigated due to discrepancies in my claim.

Complete new 12 Page write up from BVA with Award of Benefits.

Back to Hungtington West Virginia to their AMC - Not the Regional Office

Awaiting check.

Now you stated BVA and then the AMC and then to the DAV to correct for errors. Is the DAV ( Disabled American Veterans Organization) or are they some one else.

Did you receive a SSOC from the AMC with a paper to turn back in to submit new evidence?

I know this will drive you crazy, but maybe I can help you, for I have traveled the complete path from R.O to BVA to AMC and back the BVA.

To this date, my Service Officer cannot see my claims file or touch it for it is not at the Regional Office.

I will be my best to help you solve the puzzle.

Always,

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my confussion. Why did I get the letter from Seattle? My RO is Reno. The letter from Seattle stated that I had 30 days to reply to their decission which was in disagreement to the BVA decission. The information about being sent to the DAV (Disabled American Veterans) for their input was given to me orally by the AMC this morning. How many different ways are there to decide a claim? I guess this is where my confussion is.

Jo Ann

US Army

1974-1977

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
This is my confussion. Why did I get the letter from Seattle? My RO is Reno. The letter from Seattle stated that I had 30 days to reply to their decission which was in disagreement to the BVA decission. The information about being sent to the DAV (Disabled American Veterans) for their input was given to me orally by the AMC this morning. How many different ways are there to decide a claim? I guess this is where my confussion is.

Jo Ann

JoAnn,

No one to my knowledge can go against the BVA Judges decision.

I am pulling out my telephone numbers for you. Call until you get the answers. These people sure helped me turn my claim around.

BVA Directors Office - Lucy or Carol will most likely answer the telephone. 1- 202- 565- 5001

AMC Director Russo - This lady can be a little on the smart talking side, but can be gotten around. Just keep talking and do not let her intimidate you. 1- 202- 565 - 4445

Director of Veterans Benefits - 1-202- 273- 6763

BVA Case Management - Ms. Moye - 1- 202- 273 - 7453

Carrie Clark, her name would be on your letter from the BVA - Private telephone number 1 - 202 565 - 6393

See where this takes you.

Hope this helps you.

Betty

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use