Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Va Suicide Stat Cover Up

Rate this question


Question

Posted

from:http://www.huntingtonnews.net/columns/080424-rutherford-columnsveteransuicide.html

this is one of many provocative takes on this news story-

that continues to be discussed in news :

"Specifically, Dr. Ira Katz, the VA’s head of mental health, insisted in a CBS interview, “there is no epidemic of suicide.”

The VA and Katz provided the network showing 790 attempted suicides in 2007.

Yet two days afterwards, Katz told a media adviser in an e-mail labeled: “Shhh --- not for the CBS News Interview Request” that “our suicide prevention coordinators are identifying about 1,000 attempts per month among veterans we see in our medical facilities.

CBS reported an epidemic of 6,200 veteran suicides in 2005. Katz attacked the report, yet in an email said , “there are about 18 suicides per day among America’s 25 million veterans.” That would be 6,570 per year.

Interestingly, these stats do not include reports about suicide and suicide attempts among soldiers still on active duty. "

Men and women- when I got a copy of the VA Shh email I thought I would go ballistic-

I feel that my husband and I were truly recepients of unheard Shhhs when the VA was deliberately concealing his true medical condition from us.How many times have they done that to other veterans?

One sole VA doctor wanted to take steps to properly diagnose my husband in 1992-but the test he wanted done was never performed.

This doctor made a statement that Dr. Bash used with his permission-in one of my 2 IMOS.

Either the VA is still maintaining their Shhh position over my husband's true medical etiology of his demise (my claim filed in 2003)or my POA made sure that

VA would never see these IMos and my additional medical evidence.

I have had to get together lots of VA stuff for the CUE lawyer and it has taken weeks to do that-

I realised I had about 7 denials of my FTCA and Section 1151 claims before I succeeded.The most critical evidence had continually not been considered.

If my POA deliberately prevented the VARO from seeing my IMOs and all other medical evidence (which is possible)- the OGC will take care of that-

but if the VARO has them and continues to ignore them-I sent them to Deputy Sec Mansfield and he will have to answer to that.

I wonder what the VA is saying Shh about right this minute-

I only won my past claims by fighting a battle.

The evidence for those claims as well as the evidence I have now-clearly supported them.

I never dreamed that this additional AO claim would again become a battle but it did.

After I got tough in 1997 my claims were awarded.

I guess this is what it takes for some of us.

I could sit here for more months or years and think that the VARO will finally read my evidence.

Then again they cannot read what they dont have.

When the VA told me in 2006 that-even after my remand-the IMOs-in less then 3 months - were gone again from my C file-all I have is an email from my POA that said they checked themselves and the IMOs were still there.

The same POA rep who said he presented the initial one in 2005 to the DRO-which the SSOC states never happened at all.

I can continue to sit here thinking months down the road my IMos and other evidence will finally be addressed by the VA.

But after reliving the last battle I had via all this paperwork I had to send to a lawyer--that probably would mean I am suffering from an illusion.

I have decided instead to get tough.

If you have sent the VA medical evidence that they continue to ignore year after year-

and you also have IMOs from respected Drs like Dr. Bash (who Mansfield knows full well provides detailed medical opinions with full rationale to the VA)then I suggest that you get tough too.

There is simply no good reason for amply documented claims,supported by medical evidence, to be in the backlog year after year.

If Dr. Katz can say Shhh so easily in email-over the suicide rates of veterans , I think someone is saying shhhh over the entire claims process and the stats over the true amount of claims in the backlog-838,000 -I believe the VA stated in the testimony for the SF DC lawsuit-

and even if this amount is accurate-it is absolutely disgraceful- when you read remands from the BVA that account for a re-do.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

I believe that the VA has many secrets that if not kept secret could help thousands of Veterans and their families have a much better life if they did not remain a secret.

The VA is silent about many things that could help Veterans but chooses to keep quiet to save money. In many cases its a false economy as it could help Veterans lead a healthier life and cut down on expensive Medical consequences and for what?

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use