Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Additional Vcaa Notice Letter Related To Recent Cavc Decision

Rate this question


Question

Posted

Greetings all:

Current Status: NOD filed 9/07, DRO review occurring, Waiting on decision/SOC

4/29/08 I received an additional letter from VA outlining all the rating criteria for my back injury increase that is under DRO review right now. The letter explained that this additional information was provided due to a recent court decision.... enclosed was an election notice (almost twin of VCAA) asking if I wanted 30 days before VA decides my claim or whether to go ahead immediately. It also said return of the notice was not required. Mailed it out the following Monday received my return receipt indicating VA received it on the 9th of May.

I called 1-800 number to check on status of claim, person looked it up asked about letter, I indicted they should have it back, individual checks system says its not logged yet and proceeds to tell me they are about 60 days behind in just logging this information into the system.

They send a letter saying should we wait 30 days or do you want us to act without waiting? It is implied if you don’t respond they will wait 30 days. You return the letter promptly but then find out the system can't process the response to this YES/NO question in under sixty days (due to volume).

So riddle me this Batman... will my returning the form letter saying please proceed immediately lock my file for 60 days while they work on entering the response? Or will they proceed after 30 days, but still spend the resources to log the answer even after it becomes a moot point.

It’s a miracle anything gets done in VBA.

Best regards,

Tyler

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Posted

It must be about the Vasquez Flores CAVC decision

what gets me is that I never got the VCAA election notice and my POA acted like it was no big deal so I responded with what I had-then

the VA decided I had not sent any addiional evidence because I did not response to the election notice- which I never got-because they didnt send it to me- as clearly documented on the illegal VCAA letter I did get-that it was not enclosed.

I think Vasquez Flores is one more hurry up and wait deal-

A real VCAA notice looks like they will decide the claim after 60 days- this new CAVC decision makes it look like they can do that after waiting 30 days-

when the reality is that is usually takes years if the VCAA letter doesnt tell a vet exactly what they need or if they fail to send the Election Notice.

And of course the claim stands a good chance of going to the BVA only to be remanded for a proper VCAA letter to be prepared if they didnt send a correct one the first time.

Ridiculous

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

But I think you did good by telling the VA not to wait but to go ahead and rate you.

If all your evidence is in you want them to not find excuses to put your file back in the pile and forget about it. They may anyway but at least you are not helping them to delay you. If you don't get an election form I think the VA just does nothing.

Posted

"If you don't get an election form I think the VA just does nothing."

Thst is the main reason my claim has been at the Buffalo VARO for over 5 years.

And the reason I got a remand in weeks and not years from the BVA.

It is prejudicial error to fail to send the VCAA Election form as well as a generic VCAA letter.

Since my POA inisisted at the time that my VCAA letter was legal, and even the director of NYSDVA did too-

that was one of my charges against them in my OGC complaint.He (former director) insisted in writing that my VCAA letter was legal but the BVA knew it wasnt.

It seems that nothing triggers the VA to really work on a claim but for the signed and returned VCAA Election Notice.

I called Ron Abrams NVLSP about this and he said I sure took the right steps to get that remand fast-

but I pointed out that this is what vet reps should be doing to prevent the backlog at the BVA due to remands over the VCAA and my POA refused to help me get it.

How many vets think they did get a legal VCAA letter only to find that the VA will not read their evidence and send them to the BVA-where afer over a year or more the BVA will remand the claim back to the RO-

Vets have died waiting for claims that were set up for VCAA remands-all because the VARO did not take the time to send them a legal VCAA letter in the first place.

In 2000 the VCAA was enacted-and was supposed to be our most important Duty to Assist Right.

The VA turned it into a scam and caused the backlog by failing to be compliant with the VCAA in thousands of veterans cases-

and their vet reps just stood by and allowed it to occur.

The reason my POA illegally revoked their POA with me is that after trying to get me to believe my VCAA letter was legal-for over 4 years at that point-

a NYSDVA rep actually looked at what I got as a VCAA letter-in their file on me- and immediatly agreed with me.

When I raised that point in response to VA on a legal VCAA letter I got on a different claim-

some dope at NYSDVA saw my response and immediatly revoked my POA.

There will be a status soon from the OGC on all that.

OGC already told me that revocation was illegal.

As long as POAs can fail to question an illegal VCAA notice (and NVLSP says they should right away)

claims will be in endless limbo and th backlog will continue to grow.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use