Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Berta

Vets Sues Because

Question

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008...st-sparks-suit/

"Kellar was told by VA medical center doctors that the clamp shouldn't cause him trouble, Cole said. The attorney said that his client can set off metal detectors and lives in fear that he will be rear-ended while driving, dislodging the clamp."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

What numbskulls.

Keep after it!

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008...st-sparks-suit/

"Kellar was told by VA medical center doctors that the clamp shouldn't cause him trouble, Cole said. The attorney said that his client can set off metal detectors and lives in fear that he will be rear-ended while driving, dislodging the clamp."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Denver VA killed my father in 2005. They settled out of court. I stayed for 4 months at the Denver VA and hope I never end up there. It's a dirty nasty cruel place. I'm service connected for depression and sought help from the mental health department at the Denver VA when my father was dying and they told me since I went to the Cheyenne VA they would not help me.

!@#$%^ the Denver VA their doctors nurses and cna's. Its been 3 years and it seems like it was yesterday. Nobody should watch their loved one die the way he did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MY God, they are already trying to play it like, OL'well you should be hunky dory and if you feel any pain from that clamp you are a lier and if you really do feel pain, it was there before the clamp was left in there rubbing up against the raw nerves on your spine you'll be fine with it left in there. Jesus, these guy should have the regular 50 to 80 million slapped on there hind ends. Thats more than a million dollar mistake, maybe if it happened in the 70's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Otey- After years of FOIA rigamorale-I recently found out some very upsetting information-regarding my settlement-

I had charged numerous doctors with malpractice and the General COunsel attorney assured me these negligent doctors would be disciplined in some way.

The actual medical reports I got under FOIA not only proved my FTCA charges but were more horrible that I thought.

This involved numerous doctors over a 6 year period.

At settlement the OGC assured me there would be some ramifications for these quacks-

after many FOIA attempts to see what the VA actually did about them-I discovered exacty what the VA was supposed to do-

They were to make a mandatory repory to the NPDB (National Practicioners Data Bank, that becomes public knowledge in most states vua the Depat of Health and Human Services.

Not only does this all go onto the doctor's records- it is an obvious way to stop further negligence in the same way from the same doctors.

I recently went through the entire state HHS data base-not one single doctor who I named in my SF 95 was on it-

they all got away scot free-

I then did a lot of research hat showed that VA had been negligent in reporting other FTCA cases (GAO report) -in a timely report-

yet I had no idea how many other cases were never reported at all to the NPDB-meaning negligent VA doctors who caused further disability or death to a veteran got by without any discipline at all.

The lawyer for the big VCS lawsuit told me he was shocked to learn that successful 1151 awards do not have any reporting requirements at all-

they dont-

But any FTCA cash settlement MUST be accounted for through the NPDB and then via the HHS.

By failing to report these awards as moneys charges to the doctor in a disciplinary report- the VA has managed to not only allow negligent dctors to continue to practice in a negligent way-

the VA has also pulled the wool over this country by being quite able to hide the actual statistics of death or disability with malpractice so serious that it generates a FTCA award-

I have asked Congressman Filner ( Chair of H VAC ) to look into this and also I have asked the OGC to respond to an additional FOIA that I know will produce more hemming and hawing-and then I will determine what to do next with this info-

It might well take getting a lawyer to use Discovery to produce the info that I need.

If the VA fails to adhere to the mandatory NPDB reporting requirements- for any FTCA settlement regardless of the settlement amount-then the USA (that is who we settle with)has deliberately misled the public as to just how many vets the VA has killed or harmed with lousy medical care.

It is in my opinion- one more way the VA is saying "SHHH" as Dr. KAtz did when he heard the VA's suicide statistics do not reflect the true picture at all of vets in their care who have committed suicide.

I suggest to every FTCA recepient that you double check to see if the NPDB requirements were met by the VA- or if the doctors who malpracticed on you were never disciplined at all and never even knew they caused the USA to pay you off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PS-the NPDB told me to report these doctors to them myself-

so eleven years after a FTCA settlement these doctors would get a disciplinary report of negligence-

I feel however-why should I do the VA's job for them on that but then again- in the past eleven years perhaps they continued malpracticing on other vets.

Since their names are not in the data bank all I can assume is that my husband was an isolated case-

(or other vets or widows sued under FTCA and won yet the VA again failed to report them at all)

If the VA would get off their thumbs on my AO claim (another instance of malpractice I was unaware of when I filed FTCA)

I could pursue this better-

at this point-after over 5 years- I hesitate to do anything that would get my AO claim off the DRO's desk-

which a re-open of the FTCA matter would involve-

Maybe this is why my medical evidence has remained ignored by the VA so many times-they knew the doctors were never reported properly and my AO claim involves more malpractice.

I could not sue them under FTCA twice for the same death.

My only recourse was to get the IMos and prove the additional malpractice was an AO disablity that contributed to Rod's death.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.

       

      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.

       

      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.

       

      P&T

       

      TDIU

       

       

       

      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 7 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.

       










      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.


      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.


      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law


      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual


      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures


      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation


      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

       
      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.

       

      The report is here:

      https://www.nap.edu/read/25137/chapter/2

      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.

       

       

       
      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines