Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Filing Nod For Retro Benefits On Ptsd

Rate this question


Ruffcreek

Question

I was recently awarded 100% for PTSD (HAPPY).

I was paid retro to 2/27/08, the date I submitted the claim for an increase from 50%. My original claim in which I was awarded 50% was submitted July 2006.

38 CFR 4.7 says "where there is a question as to which of two evaluations shall be applied, the higher evaluation will be assigned if the disability picture more nearly approximates the criteria required for that rating. Otherwise, the lower rating will be assigned."

Dosen't this give me grounds for filing a NOD requesting the higher evaluation of 100% back to July 2006?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
I was recently awarded 100% for PTSD (HAPPY).

I was paid retro to 2/27/08, the date I submitted the claim for an increase from 50%. My original claim in which I was awarded 50% was submitted July 2006.

38 CFR 4.7 says "where there is a question as to which of two evaluations shall be applied, the higher evaluation will be assigned if the disability picture more nearly approximates the criteria required for that rating. Otherwise, the lower rating will be assigned."

Dosen't this give me grounds for filing a NOD requesting the higher evaluation of 100% back to July 2006?

If you failed to NOD the original decision, within one year of your award notification date, it's a moot issue. You should have appealed that decision, not requested an increase, later. The only way I can see you having a chance is that you can try a CUE, based on the two C&P exam reports, quoting the rule you posted. Don't know that you'd win, but ya never know w/the VA. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Right, if your original decision became final the only way to get an EED is to file a CUE. I don't think there is any downside to filing a CUE. That would be a question for the members here to discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ruff the way i read it,you submitted a claim for a increase 2/27/08,if so, thats the reason VA retro you back to that date,and your higher evaluation is 100%.Like Phillp said,if you did't do a NOD with than the one year period, it becomes a moot issue.If you decide to do a cue for the EED,remember it have to be base on the evidence that was in front of the rater when you was awarded 50% ptsd,in other words, there was enough evidence in front of the rater, at the time you was awarded 50% to be awarded 100% without submitting any new evidence.

mobie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was the July 2006 claim final? I dont see how it could be-unless you did not NOD it in a year.One year after the denial letter-

Does the recent 100% decision refer back to the 50% decision?

Can you shape your NOD to call their attention to any evidence you submitted for 2006 decision that they disregraded -but it would have led to a better EED?

Do you get SSA for exactly the same SC disability?

If so did they consider that award in the narrative of the decision?

If not- best to apply ASAP for SSA and use the VA 100% award to support the SSA claim.

If the appeal period ran out on the initial claim, then you could file a CUE claim on it. CUE is only for legal errors-

did they give you the wrong diagnostic code in the 50% decision? Based on the evidence?

Is so that would be a CUE.

Also if an SSA award for same claimed disability preceeds a VA 100% award- the VA often uses one more year added to the date of filing the TDIU claim as the "date entitlement arose" -but they had to have knowledge of the SSA award.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for everyone's help.

Berta. Her are answers to your questions.

I failed to NOD the 2006 claim within a year so I've lost this option. Also I would not be able to present any evidence submitted in 2006 that they disregarded.

The 100% decision does not refer to the 50% decision.

I may consider filing a CUE.

Note: The reason I received 100% and not P & T is the C & P examiner made the statement that "he is still early in treatment so is not possible at this time to make a realistic assessment in our treatment might diminish the present high level of PTSD symptoms." (I had been receiving treatment at the VA for only 2 months at the time of the C & P exam)

My plans are to get a letter from the director of the PTSD clinic and have her write a letter stating that my disability is permanent and total. (if possible) Any other strategy on this or what I should or shouldn't do please let me know as I'm kind of in the clouds on this.

I will be applying for SSDI today.

Ruffcreek

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use