-
-
Commonly Claimed Disabilities
Tinnitus | PTS(D) | Lumbosacral Cervical Strain | Scars | Limitation of flexion, knee | Diabetes | Paralysis of Siatic Nerve | Limitation of motion, ankle | Degenerative Arthritis Spine | TBI – Traumatic Brain Injury
Please post your question as a New Topic by clicking this link and choosing which forum to post in.
For almost everything you are going to want to post in VA Claims Research.
If this is your first time posting. Take a moment and read our Guidelines. It will inform you of what is and isn't acceptable and tips on getting your questions answered.
Remember, everyone who comes here is a volunteer. At one point, they went to the forums looking for information. They liked it here and decided to stay and help other veterans. They share their personal experience, providing links to the law and reference materials and support because working on your claim can be exhausting and beyond frustrating.
This thread may still provide value to you and is worth at least skimming through the responses to see if any of them answer your question. Knowledge Is Power, and there is a lot of knowledge in older threads.
-
Ads
-
Similar Content
-
- 3 answers
- 227 views
-
- 2 replies
- 155 views
-
- 20 answers
- 818 views
-
- 4 answers
- 224 views
-
- 10 answers
- 387 views
-
-
Ads
-
Our picks
-
VA Will No Longer Drop Coverage of Veterans Being Cared for at Home
Tbird posted a topic in VA Disability Claims Articles and VA News,
NBC10’s Lucy Bustamante has details on the Department of Veterans Affairs making changes to its at-home care reevaluations.
-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Attorney Wants Diagnosis for Secondary Complication to Rated Condition; Must it be through VA?
Cat4Christ777 posted a question in IMO Independent Medical Opinion,
Originally, this secondary condition was claimed as 'migraines,' but while it may begin as a migraine with a complication, the VA can--and has, more than once--made it so much worse (pain-wise). If it does not qualify as a migraine, then my attorney and I need to come up with a different diagnosis. It's definitely a neurological issue, possibly 'occipital neuralgia,' as the condition meets the criteria of its definition, here: https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/occipital+neuralgia.-
- 24 replies
-
-
VALife insurance program coming January 2023 for Veterans with service connection
Tbird posted a topic in VA Disability Claims Articles and VA News,
In January 2023, VA will launch a new life insurance program called Veterans Affairs Life Insurance (VALife), which provides guaranteed acceptance whole life insurance coverage to Veterans age 80 and under, with any level of service-connected disability. Some Veterans age 81 and older may also be eligible.-
-
- 2 replies
-
-
I found this quiet Interesting supreme court decison
Buck52 posted a question in VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims Research Forum,
click the link to read about this.
https://usmilitary.org/supreme-court-decision-may-affect-veterans-across-the-us-wave-disability-deadline-for-thousands/
From the Article
-
-
- 33 replies
-
-
VA Math, Confusing, Right? Calculate Your Final Rating Percentage!
Tbird posted a blog entry in Tbirds Blog,
10 + 50 = 50 and other VA math mysteries explained.
VA Math It’s Not Your Mother’s Arithmetic
“VA Math” is the way that the VA computes combined impairment ratings for multiple conditions in a Veteran’s compensation benefits claim – and it requires that you unlearn real math. When a Veteran has multiple medical conditions that are service-connected and the Veterans Affairs rates each at a different percentage, it would seem that they should just add up your percentages to get to a total body impairment rating.-
- 4 replies
-
-
-
Ads
-
Popular Contributors
-
Ad
-
Latest News
Question
mobie16r 2
This for anyone filing a claim for PTSD
As to entitlement to service connection for PTSD, governing
criteria specifically requires (i) medical evidence
diagnosing PTSD in accordance with 38 C.F.R.
§ 4.125(a)(2006); (ii) medical evidence establishing a link
between current symptoms and an in-service stressor; and
(iii) credible supporting evidence that the claimed in-
service stressor occurred. 38 C.F.R. § 3.3.04(f). The
provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 4.125(a) in turn require that a
diagnosis of a mental disorder conform to the American
Psychiatric Association's DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL
OF MENTAL DISORDERS, 4th Edition (1994) (DSM IV).
If a veteran did not engage in combat with the enemy, or the
claimed stressor is not related to combat, then his lay
testimony alone will not be enough to establish the
occurrence of the alleged stressor. In such cases, the
record must contain service records or other corroborative
evidence which substantiates or verifies the veteran's
testimony or statements as to the occurrence of the claimed
stressors. See Zarycki v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 91, 98 (1993).
In adjudicating a claim for service connection for PTSD, the
Board is required to evaluate the supporting evidence in
light of the places, types, and circumstances of service, as
evidenced by the veteran's military records, and all
pertinent medical and lay evidence. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1154(:P
(West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f).
Mobie16r
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
2
1
1
Popular Days
Aug 17
2
Aug 18
1
Aug 19
1
Dec 9
1
Top Posters For This Question
carlie 1 post
mobie16r 2 posts
purple 1 post
StormWolf 1 post
Popular Days
Aug 17 2008
2 posts
Aug 18 2008
1 post
Aug 19 2008
1 post
Dec 9 2008
1 post
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts