Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Pro Bono Program At Court Of Appeals For Veterans Claims

Rate this question


Mcafee

Question

New Pro Bono Program at Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

After long and careful consideration, the DAV has accepted a proposal from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, one of the nation’s leading law firms, to offer free representation at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to certain veterans referred by DAV. Click here to read entire message. I thought this may help some of you if not all of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
New Pro Bono Program at Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

After long and careful consideration, the DAV has accepted a proposal from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, one of the nation’s leading law firms, to offer free representation at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to certain veterans referred by DAV. Click here to read entire message. I thought this may help some of you if not all of us.

Could you post the link ???? Thanks !!!

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Why do you need pro bono lawyer work when the lawyers can get paid if there is any retro and there has to be if you are at the court? Pro Bono work at the very beginning of the process would be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello All Hope All Is Well. I am so sorry I thought i did post the link for this http://www.davmembersportal.org/News%20Ano...PageView=Shared

TO: National Officers

Department Commanders and Adjutants

Chapter Commanders and Adjutants

All National Service Officers

VA Regional Office Directors

State Directors of Veterans’ Affairs

DAVA National Adjutant

FROM: Arthur H. Wilson, National Adjutant

SUBJ: New Pro Bono Program at Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

DATE: July 2, 2008

After long and careful consideration, the DAV has accepted a proposal from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, one of the nation’s leading law firms, to offer free representation at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to certain veterans referred by DAV.

This new arrangement will provide even more resources to disabled veterans seeking to obtain benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs. In a number of cases, they will now be able to access the resources of Finnegan and its very talented lawyers in exercising their right to independent judicial review of benefit decisions.

Under the agreement, Finnegan will offer pro bono representation at the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to certain veterans referred by DAV. All in all, Finnegan will likely handle between 100 and 200 cases each year at the court, all of which will be selected from the thousands that DAV handles — and will continue to handle — at VA’s Board of Veterans’ Appeals.

The DAV’s foremost concern continues to be ensuring that disabled veterans have the very best representation possible as they pursue their claims for disability compensation and other earned benefits from the VA. We are very pleased that a prestigious firm such as Finnegan has volunteered to provide pro bono services to our nation’s veterans and their families, services that will complement our vast program of representation by our National Appeals Officers, National Service Officers, Transition Service Officers, Department Service Officers and Chapter Service Officers.

As you may know, the DAV was the first veterans service organization to submit an appellate brief to the veterans court after it was established in 1988 and was the first organization to present oral argument by a non-attorney practitioner. The DAV also won the first fact-based decision handed down by the court. The DAV also has long been a leader in developing programs to provide pro bono representation to veteran claimants. For example, in 1992, the DAV partnered with the Veterans Consortium to establish a pro bono program that continues to this day.

This new arrangement with Finnegan provides DAV the opportunity to create a better balance in our National Service Program. This includes allowing us to devote additional resources to our operations at the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, where the workload is increasing at a rapid pace.

ARTHUR H. WILSON

National Adjutant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

It's only for DAV vets, sounds like a very discriminatory program!

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Why do you need pro bono lawyer work when the lawyers can get paid if there is any retro and there has to be if you are at the court? Pro Bono work at the very beginning of the process would be better.

john999, I agree, somewhat, except that lawyers usually get paid anyway, at the CAVC level, thru the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). I believe the NVLSP has a program of attorneys, there, that do Pro Bono work, also. To me, this is just more DAV BS to make the DAV look good! jmo

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use